Re: Periodical checking stopped checking !?!

2003-09-12 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Leif, on Thu, 11 Sep 2003 09:23:53 -0600GMT (11.09.03, 17:23 +0200GMT here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : LG Please trim replies to context. A sure fire indicator that LG insufficient trimming has been done is that the original signature LG and list footer remain in the quoted text.

Re: Periodical checking stopped checking !?!

2003-09-12 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Peter, Friday, September 12, 2003, 11:54:29 AM, you wrote: PM I agree that it is insufficient quote trimming when there are 22 PM lines of quotes and one line of response. But I didn't see a sig PM or list footer quoted. How about fine-tuning your templates...? PM tongue in cheek Thppt!

Re: Periodical checking stopped checking !?!

2003-09-11 Thread Daniel Rail
Hello Thomas, Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 10:53:11 PM, you wrote: Periodical works fine here. At least every time I return I have new mail without any intervention from me. Are you using Win2000? I'm using Windows 2000 and everything works fine. This information was gathered using

Re: Periodical checking stopped checking !?!

2003-09-11 Thread Daniel Rail
Hello Melvyn, Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 9:31:31 PM, you wrote: Strange, The Bat! is reporting Windows NT 4.0 SP5 when I am actually on Win 2000 SP3hhhmm Is it possible that you substituted a Win2000 system file with a WinNT 4 file? -- Best regards, Daniel Rail Senior System

Re[2]: Periodical checking stopped checking !?!

2003-09-11 Thread Melvyn Kouri
Thursday, September 11, 2003, 8:55:37 AM, Daniel Rail wrote: DR Hello Melvyn, DR Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 9:31:31 PM, you wrote: Strange, The Bat! is reporting Windows NT 4.0 SP5 when I am actually on Win 2000 SP3hhhmm DR Is it possible that you substituted a Win2000 system

Re: Periodical checking stopped checking !?!

2003-09-11 Thread Daniel Rail
Hello Melvyn, Thursday, September 11, 2003, 10:29:42 AM, you wrote: DR Is it possible that you substituted a Win2000 system file with a WinNT DR 4 file? If so, it wasn't intentional. How do I verify this ? What file are you talking about ? Your guess is as good as mine at the moment. When