Re: Possible bug

2006-09-03 Thread Perry Nelson
Hi Thomas and fellow beta testers, Sunday, September 3, 2006, 11:41:07 AM, you wrote: PN>> http://www.flock.com Get Flocked! ;-) TF> Thanks, but I don't think I have a need for this. No problem. I'm not proselytizing, just answering your question. -- Regards, Perry Using The Bat! v3

Re: Possible bug

2006-09-03 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Perry, On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 11:09:41 -0400 GMT (03/09/2006, 22:09 +0700 GMT), Perry Nelson wrote: TF>> Flock? PN> http://www.flock.com Get Flocked! ;-) Thanks, but I don't think I have a need for this. -- Cheers, Thomas. If the cops arrest a mime, do they tell him he has the right to

Re: Possible bug

2006-09-03 Thread Perry Nelson
Hi Thomas and fellow beta testers, Sunday, September 3, 2006, 11:01:17 AM, you wrote: PN>> Cannot confirm with Flock 0.4.7.1. TF> Flock? http://www.flock.com Get Flocked! ;-) -- Regards, Perry Using The Bat! v3.81.18 RC2 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 _

Re: Possible bug

2006-09-03 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Perry, On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 13:33:35 -0400 GMT (01/09/2006, 00:33 +0700 GMT), Perry Nelson wrote: PN> Cannot confirm with Flock 0.4.7.1. Flock? -- Cheers, Thomas. If life deals you lemons, make lemonade; if it deals you tomatoes, make Bloody Marys. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine

Re: Possible bug

2006-09-01 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Roger Phillips & everyone else, on 01-Sep-2006 at 10:57 you (Roger Phillips) wrote: >>> http://xn--ovg.com/watermark ASK>> Isn't "xn--" the introducer used for encoding international addresses? > In Opera 8.54 the "xn--" is replaced by a right-pointing solid arrow > head. Does this tell y

Re[2]: Possible bug

2006-09-01 Thread Roger Phillips
Hello Alexander, Friday, September 1, 2006, 7:10:41 AM, among other things, you wrote: >> http://xn--ovg.com/watermark ASK> Isn't "xn--" the introducer used for encoding international addresses? In Opera 8.54 the "xn--" is replaced by a right-pointing solid arrow head. Does this tell you an

Re: Possible bug

2006-08-31 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Leif Gregory & everyone else, on 31-Aug-2006 at 17:35 you (Leif Gregory) wrote: > http://xn--ovg.com/watermark Isn't "xn--" the introducer used for encoding international addresses? -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de) "It occurred to me by intuition, and music was the

Re: Possible bug

2006-08-31 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Leif, On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 you wrote in LG> Anyway, I cc'd this to TBOT so we can discuss more since it's not a TB LG> problem. Oh dear, I gave up on TBOT ages ago as there's just too much waffle there for my liking, but I'll rejoin if you think it'll help. -- Regards, Richard | The Bat

Re: Possible bug

2006-08-31 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Richard, Thursday, August 31, 2006, 3:22:38 PM, you wrote: > Fairynuf but why should I have the problem whereas Daniel, with the > same version of Opera as me, can open the page perfectly when > clicking on the link in the email? I also believed that the '--' in the URL was what was throwin

Re: Possible bug

2006-08-31 Thread NetVicious
jueves, 31 ago 2006 at 17:35, it seems you wrote: > Can some of you with FF and with other browsers set as your default > test this for me? Not confirmed here. Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; es-ES; rv:1.8.0.6) Gecko/20060728 Firefox/1.5.0.6 -- /\/ Using Th

Re: Possible bug

2006-08-31 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Simon, On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 you wrote in S> I suspect it's the somewhat unusual use of the ' -- ' [dash dash] in S> the address, I've never seen that before! Fairynuf but why should I have the problem whereas Daniel, with the same version of Opera as me, can open the page perfectly when cl

Re: Possible bug

2006-08-31 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Richard! On Thursday, August 31, 2006, 2:40 PM, you wrote: MB>> I hope you and Leif can get the anomaly figured out. There's always a MB>> reason. > Yes, it's funny that only he and I have that problem, particularly when > other Opera users don't. Like Leif, the link works fine when copied

Re: Possible bug

2006-08-31 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Mary, On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 you wrote in MB> I hope you and Leif can get the anomaly figured out. There's always a MB> reason. Yes, it's funny that only he and I have that problem, particularly when other Opera users don't. Like Leif, the link works fine when copied across and pasted but di

Re: Possible bug

2006-08-31 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Richard! On Thursday, August 31, 2006, 2:19 PM, you wrote: MB>> Perhaps the version number is the difference? > Unfortunately not because Daniel is running the same version of Opera as > me. I have block unwanted pop ups set and no sound allowed. Apart from > that it's bog standard. I hop

Re: Possible bug

2006-08-31 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Mary, On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 you wrote in MB> Perhaps the version number is the difference? Unfortunately not because Daniel is running the same version of Opera as me. I have block unwanted pop ups set and no sound allowed. Apart from that it's bog standard. -- Regards, Richard | The Bat

Re: Possible bug

2006-08-31 Thread Roger Phillips
Hello Leif, On Thursday, August 31, 2006, 5:35:01 PM, among other things, you wrote: LG> http://xn--ovg.com/watermark LG> If you open the above URL in a browser (at least FF and IE) directly, LG> it works fine. However, if you click on it from an e-mail from within LG> TB, I always get an inva

Re: Possible bug

2006-08-31 Thread Roger Phillips
Hello Leif, On Thursday, August 31, 2006, 5:35:01 PM, among other things, you wrote: LG> Hello, http://xn--ovg.com/watermark LG> If you open the above URL in a browser (at least FF and IE) directly, it LG> works fine. However, if you click on it from an e-mail from within TB, I LG> always get

Re: Possible bug

2006-08-31 Thread Perry Nelson
Hi Leif and fellow beta testers, Thursday, August 31, 2006, 11:35:01 AM, you wrote: LG> http://xn--ovg.com/watermark LG> Can some of you with FF and with other browsers set as your default LG> test this for me? Cannot confirm with Flock 0.4.7.1. -- Regards, Perry Using The Bat! v3.81.1

Re[2]: Possible bug

2006-08-31 Thread Maggie Meister
Hi Richard, On Thursday, 31 August, 2006 at 11:56:39 AM you wrote: LG>> However, if you click on it from an e-mail from within LG>> TB, I always get an invalid URL error in the browser (FF). R> The same problem with Opera 9.01 as the default browser. No problem in Opera Version 9.00, Build 8212

Re: Possible bug

2006-08-31 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Leif, On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 09:35:01 -0600GMT (31-8-2006, 17:35 , where I live), you wrote: LG> It seems like somewhere along the line, TB is parsing or munging the LG> URL when it passes it to the browser. No problem with IE. -- Groetjes, Roelof Veni, Vidi, VCR - I came, I saw, I videota

Re: Possible bug

2006-08-31 Thread Maggie Meister
Hi Leif, On Thursday, 31 August, 2006 at 11:35:01 AM you wrote: L> http://xn--ovg.com/watermark L> If you open the above URL in a browser (at least FF and IE) directly, L> it works fine. However, if you click on it from an e-mail from within L> TB, I always get an invalid URL error in the browse

Re: Possible bug

2006-08-31 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Richard! On Thursday, August 31, 2006, 11:17 AM, you wrote: DŁ>> not confirmed - Opera 9.01 > Now that is strange because I get it every time with build 8552 (the > latest) No problem with Opera beta 9.1.8518.0. Perhaps the version number is the difference? (Dierk gave me the link to it

Re: Possible bug

2006-08-31 Thread Daniel Łuba
DŁ>> not confirmed - Opera 9.01 > Now that is strange because I get it every time with build 8552 (the > latest) Also have build 8522 -- Pozdrowienia, Daniel mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Nietoperek 3.81.17 RC1 pracujący w Windows XP build 2600 + () ICQ: 49156588 --

Re: Possible bug

2006-08-31 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Daniel, On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 you wrote in DŁ> not confirmed - Opera 9.01 Now that is strange because I get it every time with build 8552 (the latest) -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.81.17 RC1. POP3 account & AntispamSniper plug-in | Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1 Service Pack 2

Re: Possible bug

2006-08-31 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Leif! On Thursday, August 31, 2006, 10:35 AM, you wrote: > http://xn--ovg.com/watermark > If you open the above URL in a browser (at least FF and IE) directly, > it works fine. However, if you click on it from an e-mail from within > TB, I always get an invalid URL error in the browser (FF

Re: Possible bug

2006-08-31 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Leif, @31-Aug-2006, 09:35 -0600 (31-Aug 16:35 here) Leif Gregory [LG] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: LG> http://xn--ovg.com/watermark ... LG> Can some of you with FF and with other browsers set as your default LG> test this for me? NAK: default == FF -- Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone

Re: Possible bug

2006-08-31 Thread Daniel Łuba
> Hello, > http://xn--ovg.com/watermark > If you open the above URL in a browser (at least FF and IE) directly, > it works fine. However, if you click on it from an e-mail from within > TB, I always get an invalid URL error in the browser (FF). > Can some of you with FF and with other browsers

Re: Possible bug

2006-08-31 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Leif, On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 you wrote in LG> However, if you click on it from an e-mail from within LG> TB, I always get an invalid URL error in the browser (FF). The same problem with Opera 9.01 as the default browser. -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.81.17 RC1. POP3 account & AntispamS

Re: Possible bug

2006-08-31 Thread Zeynel Öztürk
Hello Leif, On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 at 09:35:01 -0600, (which is 31.08.2006 at 18:35:01 +2000 where I live), you wrote: > If you open the above URL in a browser (at least FF and IE) directly, > it works fine. However, if you click on it from an e-mail from within > TB, I always get an invalid URL err

Re: Possible bug

2006-08-31 Thread Nick Danger
Reply to message sent 08/31/2006, @ 09:35:01 (10:35 AM Locally) ~~~ Hello Leif, > http://xn--ovg.com/watermark > If you open the above URL in a browser (at least FF and IE) directly, > it works fine. However, if you click on it from an

Possible bug

2006-08-31 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello, http://xn--ovg.com/watermark If you open the above URL in a browser (at least FF and IE) directly, it works fine. However, if you click on it from an e-mail from within TB, I always get an invalid URL error in the browser (FF). It seems like somewhere along the line, TB is parsing or mung

Re[2]: Autoreply filter - possible bug?

2005-07-03 Thread Terry
Hi Roelof, I need to make a change to my previous answer. I never thought of looking in the Outbox since the mail had been sent. No counters ever changed and there was no indication that any mail was in that folder. I happened to check it and a copy of the sent mail is visible in the local Outbo

Re[2]: Autoreply filter - possible bug?

2005-07-03 Thread Terry
Hi Roelof, > As it says in my sig: pop3 ;-) Oops, didn't check the sig but will next time. > Does it matter whether you use in the filter options: > Send message: according to account settings/ immediately/ queue in outbox Haven't tried that one yet. > Are you using a local or a remote outbox

Re: Autoreply filter - possible bug?

2005-07-02 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Terry, On Sat, 2 Jul 2005 12:52:56 +0100GMT (2-7-2005, 13:52 +0200, where I live), you wrote: >> I tested it over here and the message got in my 'sent mail' just fine T> This is an IMAP account. Is yours IMAP or POP3? As it says in my sig: pop3 ;-) Does it matter whether you use in the fi

Re[2]: Autoreply filter - possible bug?

2005-07-02 Thread Terry
Hi Roelof, On 02 July 2005 at 09:29, Roelof wrote: > No common outgoing filters? None at all, either in common or any other account. > Are you using the %Account= macro? I've tested it with and without the %ACCOUNT macro. It doesn't make a difference. > I tested it over here and the message

Re: Autoreply filter - possible bug?

2005-07-02 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Terry, On Sat, 2 Jul 2005 09:09:49 +0100GMT (2-7-2005, 10:09 +0200, where I live), you wrote: >> My first guess would be that you've an outgoing filter that moves >> the message somewhere else. T> Brand new account with no other filters. :( Guess I'll open a bug T> report. Thanks for th

Re: Autoreply filter - possible bug?

2005-07-02 Thread Terry
Roelof penned: > My first guess would be that you've an outgoing filter that moves > the message somewhere else. Brand new account with no other filters. :( Guess I'll open a bug report. Thanks for the reply. -- Regards, Terry Using The Bat! v3.5.36 Pro on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service

Re: Autoreply filter - possible bug?

2005-06-30 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Terry, On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 13:21:18 +0100GMT (30-6-2005, 14:21 +0200, where I live), you wrote: T> I created a filter that creates and sends an automatic reply triggered T> when there is certain text in the subject. I tested it and it worked T> great however the sent message is not in my s

Autoreply filter - possible bug?

2005-06-30 Thread Terry
Don't know if this is a bug or not as I've never used an autoreply filter before. I created a filter that creates and sends an automatic reply triggered when there is certain text in the subject. I tested it and it worked great however the sent message is not in my sent folder. Is this normal be

Possible bug?

2004-11-09 Thread shemming
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've been having a few problems with the Exchange Server here; occasionally it just refuses to relay mail out of the building. When this is happening and I try and send a message I get a dialog box showing a message something like .. Message has not b

Re: possible bug?

2004-07-06 Thread Richard Anders
Hello Wallner, Tuesday, July 6, 2004, 07:51 you wrote at mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Anyone can confirm it? https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0003204 -- Richard Anders Current beta is v2.12 Beta/7 | 'Using TB

possible bug?

2004-07-05 Thread Wallner 'Waces' Tamas
Dear All, I've find the following: Account - Properties - Transport - Send Mail - Authentication. Here I like to use Special SMTP authentication. In the 'older' versions it's worked corretly. Now, I made the necesary changes, clicks on OK, close the Preferences tab. After it if I reopen the SMTP Au

Possible Bug?

2001-07-31 Thread Dean
Hello, I was trying to set up a very limited account for one of my employees. This person is highly non pc oriented, therefore I wanted to severely limit the capabilities as a user. 1) (the bug?) I made a shortcut for this person Target: "D:\THE BAT!\thebat.exe" Start in: D:\THE BAT

Re: possible bug with new taskbar setting

2001-07-04 Thread Dierk Haasis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Jason! On Wednesday, July 04, 2001 at 10:26:29 AM you wrote: > Confirm, anyone? If I am not mistaken or did misunderstand you, just "update" to 1.53d (you will only need the executable available from the beta testers page) and your problem wi

Re: possible bug with new taskbar setting

2001-07-04 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Jason, On Wednesday, July 04, 2001 at 10:26:29 AM you wrote: JJT> Hi all, JJT> I may have found a bug, but I would like a confirmation before I send JJT> in a bug report. JJT> When the "do not display program icon on task bar" option became JJT> available some version in the past, I ena

possible bug with new taskbar setting

2001-07-04 Thread Jason J Thompson
Hi all, I may have found a bug, but I would like a confirmation before I send in a bug report. When the "do not display program icon on task bar" option became available some version in the past, I enabled it. Now I want to disable it. I uncheck that option in Preferences : General, click OK, n

SOT Sticky keys - was Re: Ritlabs SecureBat! - possible bug discussion - Ctrl pressed?!

2001-06-12 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Januk, On Tue, 12 Jun 2001 at 03:58:43 [GMT -0700], you wrote: JA> JA> Does anyone know how to fix a sticky key without replacing the JA> keyboard? JA> Depends on your keyboard, but most you can gently pry (using a flat bladed screwdriver) on the underside of the sticky key. It will pop

Re: possible bug

2001-05-14 Thread Jason J Thompson
Hello Screwyluie and everyone else... S> I just now noticed that my TBBETA folder is getting kinda big, and S> sure enuff when I look at the messages in it they date back to May S> 10th... that's 3 days, 4 if you include today... either way it's more S> then the 2 days I have set in the options f

Re[2]: Help option - possible bug?

2000-12-29 Thread Chuck Smith
On Friday, December 29, 2000 at 13:44:59 GMT -0600 (which was 2:44 PM where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: Hello Dean, D> Hi Nick, D> Friday, December 29, 2000, 12:41:41 PM, you wrote: N>> Hmmm? Seems to work just fine with my install of 1.48h on Win 98SE. N>> Nick D> Well, I tried v

Re: Help option - possible bug?

2000-12-29 Thread Dean
Hi Nick, Tried h and did a reboot, everything is working just fine now. The wonders of Windows:) -- Cheers, Dean -- -- View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team

Re: Help option - possible bug?

2000-12-29 Thread Nick Andriash
On December 29, 2000, at 11:44:59 AM, Dean Wrote: D> Well, I tried version h, still am not getting any response when I D> use folder or account, properties, then using any of the actual D> tabs( contents, index, find...). I must have a setting screwed up D> somewhere. Hmmm? Do you have "The_bat

Re: Help option - possible bug?

2000-12-29 Thread Dean
Hi Nick, Friday, December 29, 2000, 12:41:41 PM, you wrote: N> Hmmm? Seems to work just fine with my install of 1.48h on Win 98SE. N> Nick Well, I tried version h, still am not getting any response when I use folder or account, properties, then using any of the actual tabs( contents, index,

Re: Help option - possible bug?

2000-12-29 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On December 29, 2000, at 4:22:08 AM, Dean Wrote: D> I was just looking around for some different features and noticed D> that when I try to access help from: (example) Tool Bar, Account, D> Properties, then press the help button. The links withi

Re: Possible Bug - Cannot "Add Sender to Address Book"

2000-08-09 Thread Jonas Koopmann
Hi Mark, MRH> If I select a message in the message-list pane and right-click to get MRH> the context-menu up, delve into the 'specials' menu and then select MRH> "Add Sender To Address Book" nothing happens. No error messages, no MRH> new addition in my address book. I can't confirm this

Re[2]: Possible Bug - Cannot "Add Sender to Address Book"

2000-08-09 Thread Mark R Harding
Leif, Regarding your message dated: 09 August 2000... LG> Most likely your default for add/deletes got changed somewhere. .. LG> Hopefully you'll see the new entry. Chance are that one of the LDAP LG> books contains all those addresses you added because it was LG> "mistakenly" identified a

Re: Possible bug ?

2000-07-07 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
Hi Dean, On 07 July 2000 at 21:54:38 GMT -0500 (which was 03:54 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject of "Possible bug ?": DM> As soon as I hit the send button the messages go flying into the DM> net. I use deferred delivery all of

Re[2]: Possible bug ?

2000-07-06 Thread Dean M
Hello Stefan, Thursday, July 06, 2000, 4:08:09 PM, you wrote: ST> Hello Dean, DM>> I have checked all my settings regarding holding mail in the DM>> outbox until I chose to connect with the Internet. This option was DM>> working just fine until I upgraded to the last Beta. Has anyone DM>> e

Re: Possible bug ?

2000-07-06 Thread Stefan Tanurkov
Hello Dean, DM> I have checked all my settings regarding holding mail in the DM> outbox until I chose to connect with the Internet. This option was DM> working just fine until I upgraded to the last Beta. Has anyone DM> else noticed this? Is it so hot down here? I just do not understand what