Kertész Vilmos wrote on 19/04/2008 at 23:26:50 +1100
subject Memory leak, 2. (WAS Video Issue?) :
Ok, I found the cause of the HUGE VM size and I think the slowdowns:
- start TB. It is like 50 MB VM at me.
- open the Mail Editor to write a mail
The size of the VM shoots up to 125
Ok, I found the cause of the HUGE VM size and I think the slowdowns:
- start TB. It is like 50 MB VM at me.
- open the Mail Editor to write a mail
The size of the VM shoots up to 125 MB... It is not lowered when I
send the mail or close the mail editor.
Isnt it a little too much
[Reply to: »Jan Rifkinson« · 2008-03-14 · 21:14 h (CET)]
Moin, Jan!
Has anyone noted a memory leak in the current betas? Trying to track
something down.
Quite the contrary – v4.0.x is much better than the v3.99.x in this
point.
At the moment (running some hours) 15MB RAM/61MB virtual Memory,
On Friday, March 14, 2008, 20:46:35, Volker Ahrendt wrote:
At the moment (running some hours) 15MB RAM/61MB virtual Memory,
minimized 3MB/61MB.
Hint: when a program is minimised it doesn't use any less memory,
Windows only swaps most of it's working set out to swap file.
--
Jernej Simončič
Hello Ethan,
Sunday, November 25, 2007, 3:47:23 PM, you wrote:
EJM Can anyone verify this problem?
I can't look for the reason, I can only confirm that this .25 version also
uses more memory than (seems) necessary and predecessors did.
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
using
Hello Ethan,
Sunday, November 25, 2007, 8:47:23 AM, you scribbled:
EJM Sunday, November 25, 2007
EJM I continue to experience some sort of memory leak with the current
EJM official version of The Bat. After about half of a day of use, it
EJM moves from 57, 232 K to just under 180, 000K. Even
I continue to experience some sort of memory leak with the current
official version of The Bat. After about half of a day of use, it
moves from 57, 232 K to just under 180, 000K. Even when I minimize the
program, it still continues to escalate.
Can anyone verify this problem? By the way, I
WH One more thing that I noticed on this topic: Open The Bat! and
WH close it without doing anything else. Do this several times.
WH Notice how the memory footprint increases significantly each
WH time!! I am now up to 67 MB after about 8 or 10 times!
I substantially reduced the number of
Hello Vili,
On Thursday, July 21, 2005, at 6:57:46 AM, you wrote
re: Memory leak?:
V As I learnt it, it came with new GUI, and Robo is working on it to fix
V it.
I am fairly new to the list, I'm not sure what you mean. Is Robo one
of the developers? In other words, if this issue is being looked
Hello Wayne!
On Thursday, July 21, 2005, 12:25 PM, you wrote:
V As I learnt it, it came with new GUI, and Robo is working on it to fix
V it.
I am fairly new to the list, I'm not sure what you mean. Is Robo one
of the developers? In other words, if this issue is being looked into,
then I am
Hello Clive,
On Sunday, July 17, 2005, at 7:37:06 AM, you wrote
re: Memory leak?:
When I start TB!, it takes 38 MB RAM. After reading some mail and
sending one out, it takes 46 MB. Sometimes it goes up to 57 MB and
it becomes slow to CLOSE the mails and CLOSE TB! itself. Now I didnt
use IMAP
Inreplytomid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
VHellotbbeta,
VWhenIstartTB!,ittakes38MBRAM.Afterreadingsomemailand
Vsendingoneout,ittakes46MB.Sometimesitgoesupto57MBandit
VbecomesslowtoCLOSEthemailsandCLOSETB!itself.NowI
Vdidntuse
VIMAP(removedtemporarly),whileItried.
When I start TB!, it takes 38 MB RAM. After reading some mail and
sending one out, it takes 46 MB. Sometimes it goes up to 57 MB and
it becomes slow to CLOSE the mails and CLOSE TB! itself. Now I didnt
use IMAP (removed temporarly), while I tried.
This is an old problem that's been discussed
Hello Vili,
On Saturday, July 16, 2005, at 3:21:26 PM, you wrote
re: Memory leak?:
V When I start TB!, it takes 38 MB RAM. After reading some mail and
V sending one out, it takes 46 MB. Sometimes it goes up to 57 MB and it
V becomes slow to CLOSE the mails and CLOSE TB! itself. Now I
V
Saturday, July 16, 2005, 2:27:26 PM, (Internet Time - @852) you wrote:
Hello Vili,
V Hello tbbeta,
V Ok, I found the cause of the memory leak. I know, that there must be
V a leak, I felt it :) ...:
V 1. Check the mem. need of TB! in task manager. Lets say it is X MB.
V 2. Ctrl+N, new mail.
On Saturday, July 16, 2005 at 2:27:26 PM [GMT -0500], Vili wrote:
1. Check the mem. need of TB! in task manager. Lets say it is X MB.
2. Ctrl+N, new mail. And just close it, dont do anything. Repeat it,
for example 10 times.
3. Check the mem. need of TB! in task manager. It will be ca.
Saturday, July 16, 2005, 2:27:26 PM, (Internet Time - @852) you wrote:
Hello Vili,
V Hello tbbeta,
V Ok, I found the cause of the memory leak. I know, that there must be
V a leak, I felt it :) ...:
V 1. Check the mem. need of TB! in task manager. Lets say it is X MB.
V 2. Ctrl+N, new mail.
Hello Roelof,
On Saturday, July 16, 2005, at 4:28:46 PM, you wrote
re: Memory leak in the last version, I found it! :))):
RO Well, I was using the AVG plug-in and BayesIt.
Not here. Memory leak is occurring without it. Just checked, TB is
using 63 MB. That's almost twice MS Access with a huge
Hello Vili everyone else,
on 16-Jul-2005 at 21:27 you (Vili) wrote:
Ok, I found the cause of the memory leak. I know, that there must be
a leak, I felt it :) ...:
[...]
Please confirm it.
I can confirm this, too - however, when I minimize TB to the system tray
and then open it again,
On Wednesday, May 26, 2004, 10:49, Marcus Ohlström wrote:
When opening MidroEd, regardless if I'm creating a new mail or answering
an old, TB! leaks memory. At least 3KB of memory is allocated and not
returned when closing the editor (it doesn't matter if I close it by
sending the email or
On Thursday, October 14, 2004, 16:01, Marcus Ohlström wrote:
This is even worse now, according to my Task Manager, TB!'s memory
usage goes up between 5-7MB each time I open the MicroEd. In addition,
5-7MB of virtual memory is reported as lost too.
When trying after sending the mail, I could
Hello Dierk,
On 6 Dec 2001 at 10:47:57 you wrote (at least in part):
I use it all the time (for testing!!! I don't need true type fonts
*g*)
DH You surely do mean variable pitch fonts? If you really don't need
DH TrueType (which, BTW, is a trademark) you are either not on Windows or
DH use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Peter!
On 6 Dec 2001 at 09:15:13 you wrote:
No, but this may be due to the fact I'm running W2K with it's much
improved memory handling.
You are right, from the last discussion on memory leakage (concerning
the new RTV) I remember that
Hello Ali,
Wednesday, December 08, 1999, 4:34:33 PM GMT+0800, Ali Martin wrote:
AM You know, I was thinking of a questionnaire along those lines. You are
AM indeed a worthy member and we will accept you graciously. :) But
AM remember, we seek no remedy for our apparent infirmity.
AM Do you
Hi Ali,
Wednesday, December 08, 1999, 8:34:33 AM, you wrote:
AM Do you feel depressed or restless when your e-mail volume gets low and
AM furthermore, do you fiddle with your e-mail program when
AM disappointingly no mail is awaiting you when you check for it?
ROFL
If you are really
25 matches
Mail list logo
