Re[2]: OT: Very calm...

2002-05-19 Thread Alexander Leschinsky
Hello Kevin, On Sun, 19 May 2002 10:48:06 -0400 (19.05.02 20:48 my local time) you wrote about OT: Very calm..., at least in part: KC I never liked the KC s/mime concept that I had to get a cert from a 3rd party who would KC have a copy of my key. I like the fact that I can generate my

Re[2]: OT: Very calm...

2002-05-15 Thread Alexander Leschinsky
Hello Kevin, On Wed, 15 May 2002 20:08:15 -0400 (16.05.02 06:08 my local time) you wrote about OT: Very calm..., at least in part: KC It looks okay from my end. Is anyone else having problems KC with my KC cert? Everybody, who have selected internal S/MIME and nobody with MS-CryptoAPI,

Re[2]: OT: Very calm...

2002-05-15 Thread Alexander Leschinsky
Hello Jacek, On Wed, 15 May 2002 23:17:23 +0200 (16.05.02 03:17 my local time) you wrote about OT: Very calm..., at least in part: JW In TB! 1.60k I can still see: JW ,- [ S/MIME certificate information ] JW | This S/MIME certificate is invalid. The issuer of this JW | certificate