Wrong attachment name conversion, was Re[2]: Part.ATT???

2005-08-06 Thread Vili
Hello Manuel, > Thanks for your analysis. TB! shouldn't edit the message, TB! should > simply decode the filenames given in standard iso-8859-1. > Nevertheless, perhaps you might add a note about your results to BT. What is the link for that BT? Manuel: the mail you sent out was

Re[2]: Part.ATT???

2005-08-04 Thread Vili
>> Yep, problem. Use English alphabet until fix :) > So all TB! users, who don't write in English, should tell their customers not > to name their documents with "special characters"? I see... I am Hungarian, so we have special characters, also... So this error hurts me, too. I tried to joke :))

Re[2]: Part.ATT???

2005-08-04 Thread Vili
Hello Manuel, > Attached are three documents - all show some uninteresting content. > The original names are: > - À propos publicité.doc > - grüße.doc > - resumé.png > So, let's see how TB! works... ;) Ok, here is the deal and the source of the problem: If you see the source of your sent email,

Re[2]: Part.ATT???

2005-08-04 Thread Vili
Hello Manuel, > Attached are three documents - all show some uninteresting content. > The original names are: > - À propos publicité.doc > - grüße.doc > - resumé.png > So, let's see how TB! works... ;) It does not even show that it has attachments... -- Vili __

Re[2]: Part.ATT???

2005-08-04 Thread Vili
Hello Manuel, >> Could you just send me the part of the mail source that shows the >> first some line attachments? > I hope this one will behave like described and show some "Part" things. ;) > I didn't test before, but I'm quite sure, that TB! won't decode it right - > unless the list-daemon modi

Re[2]: Part.ATT???

2005-08-04 Thread Vili
Hello Mary, > On Thursday, August 04, 2005, 1:25 PM, you wrote: >>> I don't know how to do that Unix mailbox thing though. Otherwise, I >>> would not mind sharing... >> Select the message from the message list in the main window, then >> Tools | Export message to | UNIX mailbox and enter file na

Re[2]: Part.ATT???

2005-08-04 Thread Vili
Hello Matt, > On Thursday, August 4, 2005 @ 8:48:40 AM [-0700], Vili wrote: >> :))) Ok. >> Could you just send me the part of the mail source that shows the >> first some line attachments? >> I saw part.att as attach ONLY, when part.att was attached to the >> mail... > I get them all the time but

Re: Re[2]: Part.ATT???

2005-08-04 Thread Jay Walker
On 8/4/05, Vili wrote: > Could you export and send me in private the mail that has this > part.att problem? Not this time, Vili. I don't share personal email on principle. Think of it as a Catholic priest sort of thing. But if I get something less sensitive, I'll pass it on. -- jaywalker Windows

Re[2]: Part.ATT???

2005-08-04 Thread Vili
Hello Jay, > On 8/4/05, Manuel Breitfeld wrote: >> I'm sorry, this was just a duplicate entry. The entry, which is currently >> open >> for opinions, is the following: ;) >> >> Filenames of attachments are not correctly decoded (RFC 2231): >> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4197 > Yes, th