Hello Mse,
Sunday, April 26, 2009, 13:38:12, you wrote:
1. Another typo is in Temlate macro. The p is missing.
Thank you, we have just fixed it, but the last beta came out before this.
2. What exactly is the macro for a message delay? The user interface
here says '%DELAY=...' in QT it is
Hello Netvicious,
Sunday, April 26, 2009, 0:17:45, you wrote:
But when we are defining a custom delay for a message I think the more
button should not be applied here. I suggest you to place the text
with the real date-time of the sending without pressing any button,
because it's a good
Hello Volker,
Monday, April 27, 2009, 0:00:35, you wrote:
The arrows of the Time box do not work (see attachment), but you can
type a different time in the corresponding field.
This is a behaviour of a standard windows calendar control. Do you know other
software when it works not the same as
Hello Jens,
Tuesday, April 28, 2009, 14:49:07, you wrote:
And i still do not understand why to compare to a date?
Maybe, the wording was too perplexing Now we have rephrased it and it is
now easier to understand without sacrifice in functionality.
For me it would be enough if the Dialog
Hello Jens,
Tuesday, April 28, 2009, 15:06:53, you wrote:
That is enough (until i understand why to have more than that):
http://www.de2all.de/thebat/screen78.png
You were right, while remaking the dialog we've lost some links that turn off
some checkboxes when the user clicks the other... It
Hello Roger,
Tuesday, April 28, 2009, 15:13:48, you wrote:
OK, you are perhaps correct about there not being any other way to test, but
I'm still not sure exactly what is meant by an 'arbitrary' date and time, as
distinct from a required time that is set in the 'postponed' programme.
You were
Hello Volker,
Wednesday, April 29, 2009, 12:25:10, you wrote:
A few more thoughts brought me to this real flexible solution (see
attachment).
Thank you for some nice thoughts!
The postponed sending dialog is the graphical editor for the small textual
argument of the %POSTPONE macro, e.g.
Hello Volker,
Wednesday, April 29, 2009, 18:42:22, you wrote:
Did you see my latest draft for the dialog?
Yes, this dialog have made a valuable contribution to further design of the
dialog that you may see in the .19 beta.
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin
Ritlabs SRL
Hello Volker,
Wednesday, April 29, 2009, 18:50:01, you wrote:
And that has nearly nothing to do with the [More]-Button. So please
think about my dialog draft. :-)
We will probably remove the more button when it is not needed and/or replace
it with another control, like in the attached image.
Hello Volker,
Tuesday, April 28, 2009, 12:52:32 PM, you wrote:
Okay, leave the info, that the postponed message will be sent on …
But the test section – even for messages that are automatically
created by sorting office filters or by mass mailing quick templates –
is IMHO of no real need.
Hello Mau,
Monday, April 27, 2009, 2:03:40, you wrote:
Hold for...
( ) Hours ( ) Minutes ( ) Seconds
... and then send.
Your idea to use the tail ...and then send is excellent! But it gives another
complication. The user can combine hold over (2) days and use specific time
8:00 for,
Hello Mau,
Monday, April 27, 2009, 2:03:40, you wrote:
So, my suggestion would be to make the
title be 'Postponed/Scheduled Sending'.
This is a nice idea. At least The Bat! uses it's scheduler and creates events
to send the messages.
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin
Hello Volker,
Tuesday, April 28, 2009, 12:20:14, you wrote:
Either you want to send a message in x days/hours/minutes or at a
specific time. But please do not mix it up and confuse the user.
No, the idea is to combine both of the options.
Instead of the mentioned above, one can say: Send
Hello Volker,
Monday, April 27, 2009, 23:36:02, you wrote:
I would suggest to remove most of the More part at the bottom of the
dialog. = See attachments.
Why do you suggest to remove it?
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin
Ritlabs SRL
http://www.ritlabs.com/
Hello Roger,
Monday, April 27, 2009, 7:40:48, you wrote:
It is not clear to me just what is the need for Test against an arbitrary
date and time in the future.
This can be useful, for example, for messages that are automatically created by
sorting office filters or by mass mailing quick
Hello Jens,
Monday, April 27, 2009, 22:52:00, you wrote:
Yes, exept of the lower part with the compare against date..
How do you suggest to improve it?
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin
Ritlabs SRL
http://www.ritlabs.com/
16 matches
Mail list logo
