Hello all,
Monday, January 9, 2012, Zygmunt Wereszczynski wrote:
> I permanently observe errors when sending messages via Exchange server.
> The message is sent, but stays in Outbox with hourglass icon. In Voyager 4.x
> the messages were sent and moved to "Sent" folder (or anywhere, if filters
> a
Hello Zygmunt,
Monday, May 10, 2010, 21:02:26, you wrote:
>>Unfortunately, this version is buggy! First, I cannot install it in
>>the normal way, because the installer displays the error message:
>>"Windows cannot find voyager_setup.exe file".
Thank you! We will update the file tomorrow and will
Hello Thomas,
Saturday, January 30, 2010, 19:09:37, you wrote:
>>Does it allow plaintext as an alternative to OTFE?
Not yet. We are now focused on the new IMAP.
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutinmailto:m...@ritlabs.com
_
Hello Thomas,
Wednesday, December 23, 2009, 3:14:27, you wrote:
>>I would try it if you told me I now have a choice and can install it
>>in plain (non-OTFE) mode. Kindly advise.
We will do that in some future version.
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutinmailto:m...@ritlab
Hello Krzysztof,
Tuesday, December 22, 2009, 17:40:56, you wrote:
>>I dislike Menu Navigator, but it can easy hidden: right mouse button over
>>toolbar / customise / select navigator, then 'remove item' menu / done
The option to hide menu navigator in the title bar of a window (only works
with
Hello Nick,
> Reply to message sent 3/28/2009, @ 18:14:56 (1:14 PM Locally)
> ~~~
> Hello Hamish,
>> - There is a tokenact.dat file...
> That's exactly what I was referring to. Thanks a lot!
> But...
>> I got the following from Nick Dange
Hello Marek,
Thank you, we have renamed it to
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/voyager_install_4-1-11.exe
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutinmailto:m...@ritlabs.com
Current beta is 4.1.11 | 'Using
Hello Miroslav,
Friday, September 05, 2008, 14:03:34, you wrote:
>>the path to GnuPG Key Manager is not relative.[1]
Thank you, we will fix it in the next update of The Voyager.
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin
Ritlabs SRL
http://www.ritlabs.com/
__
V>> There is no Minimize, Resize and Maximize icons at this window.
V>> Only the X is visible.
> It's a "tool" type window, thus no additional icons.
Yes, I know that, still, there should be icons. Change it to normal
window.
--
Vili
__
Hello Peter,
Saturday, August 30, 2008, 22:02:53, you wrote:
>>www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/voyager_install_4-0-32-2.exe
Thank you very much, we did use Russian install module by mistake. We have
fixed that. Could you please download this file again and confirm that the
error is fixe
8/28/2008 5:24 PM
Hi Peter,
On 8/28/2008 Peter Meyns wrote:
PM> I'd suggest you re-install 4.0x instead of replacing the EXE.
Thanks. I suspected this but wanted to be lazy.
- --
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.4.0.32.1 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP OTFE
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008, at 12:58:59 [GMT -0500] (which was 19:58 where I
live) Nick Danger wrote:
...<*snipped*>
> I have no little arrow to the right, only to the left which is for
> adding an address to the address book.
Hello Nick,
Sorry for not reading better ;-)
I confirm that from within th
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008, at 11:54:25 [GMT -0500] (which was 18:54 where I
live) Nick Danger wrote:
> Reply to message sent 08/23/2008, @ 21:11:44 (1:11 PM Locally)
> ~~~
> Hello Maxim,
> From inside the MicroEd editor, if I click on the addr
Hello Peter,
Saturday, August 23, 2008, 23:07:07, you wrote:
>>SetValueHKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\RNG\Seed
>>CreateKey HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\User
>>Shell Folders
>>CreateKey HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters
>
Hello Bill,
Sunday, May 18, 2008, 1:12:01, you wrote:
>>Followed your advice to the letter. Unfortunately it would not work
>>for me. I have three Voyager 'activation keys' none of which was
>>acceptable to the suitably named, and file system compliant new USB
>>device.
Ritlabs technical suppor
Hello Miroslav,
Sunday, May 18, 2008, 10:25:24, you wrote:
>>Voyager does not start - I left the password field empty.
Voyager will no longer accept empty passwords. You have to use an older version
of voyager or update the message base via backup/restore.
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin
Hello Miroslav,
Sunday, May 18, 2008, 3:52:15 PM, you wrote:
MF> Did you define an empty field as password? This bug only appears if an
MF> empty field is defined as password.
===
Sorry, I hadn't realised that.
No, I did not def
You wrote
> Voyager 4.0.24.12 is available at
Voyager does not start - I left the password field empty.
There is no problem with version v4.0.18, I cannot update my existing
Voyager installation. Also a fresh installation does not start no more
without a defined password.
---
>> It was very slow with small files.
> What do you call 'small files'? Messages with/without attachments?
> In my case Voyager works longer with messages with large attachments and
> a little bit faster with msgs with small or no attachments.
> Best regards, Krzysztof Kudłacik
Copying many small
>> I once bought a "fast" one, nearly threw into the Trash because of
>> Voyager.
> why? :)
It was very slow with small files. I didnt/dont use caching.
--
Vili
Current beta is 4.0.20.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverst
> With Voyager 4.0.18.4 I have other bad experience: I have fresh
> installation on my new pendrive and Voyager works extremely slow.
> Recieving messages can take up to 20 minutes per one account; on my
> previous pendrive with older version of Voyager it worked smooth and
> fast. Now it is almost
V>> Tested at home in Manual mode (Active and Manual only was checked), it
V>> works.
V>> So, not confirmed.
V>> Try to use "lists" instead of "lists.com" and see if it works or not.
> But the account name is lists.com.
Sorry, I forgot.
So, I cannot confirm... Maybe call it differently, maybe TB
>>> has anyone tried to create a new filter in the latest Voyager?
>>> I find my new filter being processed according to the account log,
>>> but the indicated action is not performed.
V>> Specify the filter for us, please.
> It is supposed to move mails from senders who belong to a certain
> addre
V>> I will test it at home with Voyager. I tested with refiltering a
V>> folder with the newest TB, it works. I will let you know about the
V>> result tomorrow. (I just read your mail now.)
> I use the same filter with The Bat!. It works fine on WinXP and on
> Win2k.
> I just saw, that the filter w
>>> has anyone tried to create a new filter in the latest Voyager?
>>> I find my new filter being processed according to the account log,
>>> but the indicated action is not performed.
V>> Specify the filter for us, please.
> It is supposed to move mails from senders who belong to a certain
> addre
>> - if a folder contains e.g. 1000 messages, it shows the content of
>> that folder slower than before. For seconds, the mail list pane is
>> empty...
> Can't confirm. I have 5 folders with >1K messages and can flip
> between them and the last message displays almost instantly here.
It happens af
Hello Peter,
Wednesday, March 19, 2008, 2:30:41 PM, you wrote:
MM>> Voyager 4.0.18.4 is available at
MM>>
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/voyager_install_4_0_18.exe
Sorry, the correct URL is
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/voyager_install_4-0-18-4.exe
--
Bes
Hello Jens,
>>> But it still writes to the registry! Isn't there a way to do without
>>> that? See https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5515
>> We will remove the speller settings from the registry.
> This will be:
> [HKEY_USERS\S-1-5-21-1202660629-2146979555-1343024091-500\Software\RIT\Voyager\
>>> But it still writes to the registry! Isn't there a way to do without
>>> that? See https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5515
JF>> Yes, a little bit:
JF>>
[HKEY_USERS\S-1-5-21-1202660629-2146979555-1343024091-500\Software\RIT\Voyager]
JF>> etc.
> Here there are only entries for the speller, b
>> Would you try to download again and see if maybe it is a different
>> install?
> Done.
> Still flapping and have smartbat tabs on opening.
Huhh
Do this please:
- Start, Run, cmd
- navigate to Voyager's dir
- type in:
dir /on > 1.txt
- navigate to Voyager's MAIL subdir
- type in:
dir /on
>> I open SmartBat (F6) and there are no Tabs on the bottom of the
>> window to be able to select different notepads. If I switch to the
>> Scheduler and back, the tabs reappear.
>> Confirmation?
> Can't confirm. Here tabs are visible upon first opening.
Thank you...
Strange thing: I made an
Hello Peter,
Wednesday, March 12, 2008, 8:06:15 PM, you wrote:
> But it still writes to the registry! Isn't there a way to do without
> that? See https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5515
We will remove the speller settings from the registry.
--
Best regards,
Maxim
Hello Marek,
Wednesday, March 12, 2008, 3:51:09 PM, you wrote:
> in Token activation dialog, first sentence contains %THEBATPRO%, which
> returns "The Bat! Professional v3"
Thank you, we have changed it to "The Bat! Professional v3".
--
Best regards,
Maximmailto:[E
Guten Tag Marek Mikus,
am Mittwoch, 12. März 2008 um 16:54 schrieben Sie:
> Hello all,
> Wednesday, March 12, 2008, Christian Grams wrote:
>> Sorry... i know the actual process but i need the registration key. :)
>> I was lead to believe that when you have a Key for TB! that it is
>> also for Vo
>> Voyager 4 BETA URL
>> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/voyager_install_4_0_18.exe
>> Hunspell dictionaries do not work in it yet. Please test other
>> capabilities and let us know the results! Thanks!
> How do i register the installed Voyager App?!?
http://www.thebat.hu/Downl
V>> I believe, one advantage (at least for me) of Voyager is this: I am
V>> using Voyager on my laptop. If I need, just copy Voyager to my USB
V>> stick, replace the key file and ready to use. I do it, when I am on a
V>> short trip, dont want to take my laptop with me.
> Hey this is a good i
3/11/2008 5:23 PM
Hi Mark,
On 3/11/2008 Mark Partous wrote:
PVN>> One has been "washed" 3 times.
MP> If that is meant literally I dare to suppose that was not on purpose?
True.
- --
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.99.4 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP OTFE
__
3/11/2008 3:14 PM
Hi Mark,
On 3/11/2008 Mark Partous wrote:
MP> (1) I know they are trying to make you believe something else,
MP> but actually that's an acronym for Only Fools Tolerate Encryption
MP> and since I'm not a fool I'm not entitled to use it.
MP> :-)
MP> Besides that: ev
3/11/2008 3:21 PM
Hi Rick,
RG> I am a home user and would find it handy but don't want to get
RG> involved with all the horror stories. Why don't they make encryption
RG> optional?
How many successful stories have you heard? I can give you some from
Cambodia, Egypt, Dominican Republic, Mexico a
> (1) The very first stick (128 MB) I bought is still alive and kicking, but
> almost half of all the others (price and brand doesn't seem to matter
> much) have stopped working.
I believe, one advantage (at least for me) of Voyager is this: I am
using Voyager on my laptop. If I nee
>> Are you from TX?
> As a matter of fact I am!
I guessed that from the "put the gun barrel against my temple." :))
>> Seriously: I think, we should ask for a Voyager. The slow shutdown
>> really pisses me off, and I would be grateful for the new improvements
>> also.
> What file system are
>> So, this is the headline, I would like to read
> That's just cruel. I glanced at that subject line, my eyes got wide
> and my pants started dancing around the room.
:)) That was the idea :)
> Then I opened the post and put the gun barrel against my temple.
Are you from TX? I hoped you did not
Hi Nick,
On Tuesday, March 11, 2008 at 10:12:37 AM you wrote:
ND> my pants started dancing around the room.
Wow, sentient pants.
ND> Then I opened the post
ND> and put the gun barrel against my temple.
That's DANGERous
--
Regards,
Maggie
“If we don't believe in freedo
Hello Miroslav,
Saturday, June 23, 2007, 16:11:44, you wrote:
>>I tried this, but unfortunately Voyager does not recognize the GnuPG
>>files.
Most probably if Voyager doesn't recognize GnuPG then The Bat! won't have
recognized it as well.
Did you make sure that gnupg executable is in the %PATH%
6/2/2007 9:23 AM
Hi Thomas,
On 6/2/2007 Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF> I was thinking about what Mr. D. said, and I couldn't come up with a
TF> reason why there should be two versions and not only the Voyager
TF> variety (if Voyager allowed the choice of whether to use OTFE or not).
TF> He might h
In reply to :
MDK> Hello Maxim,
MDK> On Thursday, May 31, 2007 at 7:18:52 PM, you wrote the following on the
MDK> subject of Voyager 3.99.8 and sent it to
MDK> tbbeta@thebat.dutaint.com
MDK>
>> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/voyager_install-3-99-08.exe
>> What's new in
Hello Vilius,
>> As we finally figured out, the problem was that he used Internet
>> Explorer v7, I used IE6. IE7 replaces the final = (equation) character
>> in the link that points to the secure Ritlabs site when you press the
>> Fetch key with %3D, the ascii code of the character "=".
>
> Vili wrote:
>> I think, it was not the FAT/NTFS change. It was the fact that when you
>> reformatted the drive, you inherently defragmented the drive.
> obviously, you're too busy enjoying conventional hard drives in an usb
> enclosure, so, at the moment, you simply can't figure out that not all
>> I think, it was not the FAT/NTFS change. It was the fact that when
>> you reformatted the drive, you inherently defragmented the drive.
> Well, I was about to say I didn't think so as I had defragged the
> drive before hoping that would help but it didn't. But before sending
> off that post I fi
> In my experience, every USB memory stick is different. The one I am
> using now reads and writes at 16MBits per second, and my previous one was
> only 8. There is a free utility on the web to test your speed, but
> it is on my office computer and I forget what it is called.
What is the name of
>> Both you and Doug are using a Gmail account for your subscription to the
>> list, and that explains the dilemma. That's why I use my Comcast account
>> for this list rather than my customary Gmail account.
> argh. it's that dupekilling feature of gmail. thanks for pointing out.
> it was there so
>> I totally agree with you Vili. Also, flash drives perform much faster
>> on Win2K than XP. Often a factor of 2 or 3 to 1. The difference in
>> performance of USB hard drives is much closer between the 2 OSs and I
>> am sure it is related to the performance of the hard drive as opposed
>> to the
>>> You must be a journalist to take out 1 sentence and forgot to quote
>>> all related stuff to earn some cheap popularity Let me quote those
>>> sentences you forgot to mention that I wrote in the same mail: "I did
>>> not want to trash USB sticks. They good for something. Also, they are
Hello Rick,
>> I tried a lot of things, the HDD just outperforms a stick, yet.
> Even when you have to be able to carry the data in your pocket?:))
You must be a journalist to take out 1 sentence and forgot to quote
all related stuff to earn some cheap popularity ;) Let me quote those
sentenc
5/13/2007 7:29 PM
Hi Rick,
On 5/13/2007 Rick Grunwald wrote:
RG> Even when you have to be able to carry the data in your pocket?:))
Mine fits there although heavier than I like. As Vili stated there is
value in flash drives. However, the discussion was on maintaining data
integrity which makes
sábado, 12 may 2007 at 18:25, it seems you wrote:
> typically(!), ANY 'usb-enclosed' hdd outperforms ANY usb flash stick.
> flash cards inserted in readers give a slightly different mileage, but
> that's a separate story.
There are USB flash sticks with an excelent speed. And they
outperforms som
>> I wrote a long answer. But I deleted it. Why? I dont want to argue.
>> I used stick with optimized for performance and use my HDD. Huge
>> difference. I DID try it. You didnt. End of story for me.
> completely wrong. tried both and both work okay. of course, assuming
> you don't expect the
> Vili wrote:
>>> you have the exact same reasons with your 'usb-enclosed' HDD.
>>> ...maybe even worse, given that write-back for USB flashdrives isn't
>>> quite as optimistic as with HDDs (including those 'usb-enclosed').
>> :)) I dont know this stuff, all I am seeing is that with a USB stick,
>
> Vili wrote:
>> I dont know... I dont _totally_ agree... Even in WinXP, you can
>> optimize a stick for performance, but if writing is delayed and for
>> some reason you have got a power failure... Or I just dont trust MS to
>> let them manage delayed writing :))
> you have the exact sam
5/7/2007 2:35 PM
Hi Vili,
On 5/7/2007 Vili wrote:
V> (What I observed is, that running Voyager from a USB stick is just not
V> the way to go...)
Unless you use Win2K. 8-]}
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.95.06 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP OTFE
Hello Peter,
> On 30-04-2007 13:24, you wrote in
> :
>> If not, but could you somehow be more specific? "No dick in drive A:"
> Well, if _this_ happens to someone I suggest that he keeps his pants on.
> :-)
Uh-oh...
I am so embarassed. I wrote I think disc first, and corrected to
disck and d
Hello Marek,
Sunday, April 29, 2007, 23:13:12, you wrote:
>>when I open Account properties, Access Violation at address 005A612D in
>>module voyager.exe, read of address 027C appears here.
>>Anybody can confirm?
Could you please download and install
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/th
> On 07-04-26 (16:18), you wrote:
>> Do you also get this type of blank menu window when you right click on
>> a misspelled word?
> yes.
Ok. Confirmed both
--
Vili
Current beta is 3.99.03 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silv
Hello Krzysztof,
> On 07-04-26 (13:54), you wrote:
>> English-titled screen capture, please.
> here you have
I have Voyager 3.99.3 (I use TB! with gmail, use Voyager only for
business), but dont see what you see...
--
Vili
The Bat 3.98.10 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Szervizcsomag 2
___
> On 07-04-26 (08:16), you wrote:
>> I recived messages with attachment/s but... I don't understand function of
>> windows shown - see in attached screen.
>> Any tips?
> I should be more precise - see next screen: what for are controls?
> Even if there are attachments the controls are empty - sma
Hello Rick,
>>> A bug yes, and embarrassment YES. It is the equivalent of coming to
>>> visit and not flushing the toilet :))
>> You are weird, man :) It is a totally different situation. While the
>> shit in the toalet disturbs you, 2 extra reg key amongst ten thousands
>> more... I dont think
Hello Thomas,
> "Can I use your computer? I won't change anything, my email program is
> completely on this USB stick."
Case A: you know that it will leave a key. Then it is a lie.
Case B: you dont know that it will leave a key. Then it is a unwanted
mistake.
Either way, it is NOT an embarassme
Hello Rick,
>>> a pass anyway. I will try the first version that doesn't write to
>>> the registry. Voyager is to be used on other people's computers and
>>> it is rather embarrassing that it leaves its marks there.
>> 1. How do they now about it? Check their registry all the time?
>> 2. Does
3/24/2007 2:49 PM
Hi Thomas,
On 3/24/2007 Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF> would expect Voyager to leave no traces.
Me too.
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.95.06 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP OTFE
Current beta is 3.98.07 | 'Usin
3/24/2007 1:52 PM
Hi Rick,
On 3/24/2007 Rick Grunwald wrote:
RG> A bug yes, and embarrassment YES. It is the equivalent of coming to
RG> visit and not flushing the toilet :))
Most folks can't even find this bathroom let alone the toilet. I doubt
they will recognize the contents.
However, it s
Hello Thomas,
> a pass anyway. I will try the first version that doesn't write to
> the registry. Voyager is to be used on other people's computers and
> it is rather embarrassing that it leaves its marks there.
1. How do they now about it? Check their registry all the time?
2. Does that harm
Hello Bill,
Friday, March 23, 2007, 17:54:06, you wrote:
>>Did you really have to tell us that you re-wrote the whole thing! ;)
The newest changes are in the bottom of this list.
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutinmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Hello Nick,
>> After starting Voyager, the very first time I click on an email to
>> write a new mail, it gives me a No disk in drive error.
> Can't confirm, and I regularly use Voyager on three different
> computers. (all using XP, should that matter)
Hmmm...
--
Vili
Hello Martin,
Sunday, January 14, 2007, 12:18:45 PM, you wrote:
> So this brings me to the question: Isn't it possible to set this
> plugin with a relative path? Or isn't it possible to use plugins
> with Voyager at all?
Running Agava with no problem.
--
Best regards,
Raymond Morris
TheBa
Hello Martin,
>> I use it on all flavors of Windows and have no problem like this. If
>> you start it from a shortcut instead of the executable you would
>> experience this behavior.
> I don't start it from a shortcut.
I have not seen it either.
> The only problem: If I insert the USB stick into
1/13/2007 4:33 PM
Hi Martin,
On 1/13/2007 Martin Schoch wrote:
>> You start it by double clicking voyager.exe in the file manager, don't
>> you? What does the error message state?
MS> I have to do more tests - at the moment it seems to me that the
MS> described problem occurs on Windows 2000 P
1/6/2007 8:23 AM
Hi Rick,
On 1/6/2007 Rick Grunwald wrote:
RG> Every time I upgrade the betas Zone Alarm catches the program change
RG> and asks to verify that it is ok This is a good thing as long as you
RG> are aware of the change and it is not some nefarious program changing
RG> the executab
1/6/2007 7:54 AM
Hi Nick,
On 1/5/2007 Nick Danger wrote:
ND> First thing I noticed was that this was the first ever version of TB!
ND> to cause MS firewall to pop-up and ask if I wanted to allow TB!
ND> access. Naturally I said yes. I ran it for quite awhile and never so
ND> much as a hint of a
1/4/2007 3:59 PM
Hi Nick,
On 1/4/2007 Nick Danger wrote:
ND> It's nice to finally be of use to someone after all these years of
ND> hanging around the community!
Don't worry, this is good stuff!
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.95.06 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP OTFE
_
1/2/2007 5:45 PM
Hi Maxim,
On 1/2/2007 Maxim Masiutin wrote:
MM> Thank you, we will take care of the bug
MM> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6158
Thank You Very Much!
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.95.06 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP OTFE
__
1/2/2007 5:22 PM
Hi Nick,
On 1/2/2007 Nick Danger wrote:
ND> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6158
ND> Hopefully I didn't botch protocol too awfully bad.
Just added my .02.
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.95.06 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP OTFE
1/2/2007 4:02 PM
Hi Peter,
On 1/2/2007 Peter Ouwehand wrote:
PO> Hello Paul Van Noord,
PO> on Tue, 2 Jan 2007 15:32:27 -0500 (2007-01-02 21:32:27 in .nl) in the
PO> message with reference you
PO> [PN] wrote (at least in part):
PVN>> It is available at [Other Options]. See Attached.
PO> I kn
1/2/2007 3:59 PM
Hi Nick,
On 1/2/2007 Nick Danger wrote:
ND> But are all the nested menus under there okay?
ND> For at least three of us they are out of sync with smart bat functions
ND> missing.
You are right, Character Sets dialog is missing and the others appear
one below where they belong
1/2/2007 2:51 PM
Hi Peter,
On 1/2/2007 Peter Ouwehand wrote:
PO> Hello Nick Danger,
PO> on Tue, 2 Jan 2007 11:27:02 -0600 (2007-01-02 18:27:02 in .nl) in the
PO> message with reference you
PO> [ND] wrote (at least in part):
ND>> Thanks for any confirmation or lack thereof.
PO> Confirmed, th
1/2/2007 12:35 PM
Hi Nick,
On 1/2/2007 Nick Danger wrote:
ND> Am I the only one that has the Options|Preferences menu acting wacky
ND> with everything below "Other options" are out of whack?
ND> It's been this way with this and the release previous to this for me.
ND> But fine with any version
Guten Morgen,
TF> I've never had runtime errors with Voyager.
I have - on average about one runtime error every two hours. But I'm
delighted to agree that the latest Voyager version is much better
here. I've seen errors here, too, but there are so few of them that I
can't give a similar "average
12/30/2006 10:25 AM
Hi Thomas,
On 12/30/2006 Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF> I've never had runtime errors with Voyager. I also find that the
TF> reaction speed depends on the host computer.
Neither have I had errors. I find that Win 2K is significantly faster
than XP when using USB 2 even when th
12/30/2006 10:16 AM
Hi MAU,
On 12/30/2006 MAU wrote:
M> Please do not insist. _I_ want to decide if I want to be protected or
M> not. Period.
I hear you _and_ I understand. However, you seem to miss the total
purpose of Voyager. It grew out of Secure Bat with security as a
primary purpose. If
12/30/2006 9:22 AM
Hi MAU,
On 12/29/2006 MAU wrote:
M> Aside of that I understand that, when using OTFE, folders (and file
M> names?) in disk have 'funny unrecognisable names'. If it is true, I
M> don't like that at all.
Like using Windows, you gradually get used to it.
--
Take Care,
Paul
V
12/30/2006 9:09 AM
Hi MAU,
On 12/29/2006 MAU wrote:
M> Hello Thomas,
M>>> I have never tried Vogager. Is there a possibility of doing so without
M>>> using OTFE?
>>
>> No, Voyager uses OTFE by default, and it cannot be turned off.
M> I don't know why it shouldn't be optional. I hate it when s
Hello Simon,
Thursday, December 28, 2006, 15:53:21, you wrote:
>>I've installed over previous version and all appears to be well.
Thank you for the prompt reply!
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutinmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Hello Richard,
V>> I have to click on that field first to enter the password.
V>> Confirmations?
> Not here. I'm just back from using Voyager at my Dad's house and, when
> the password box comes up, just type straight away without having to
> select it. In fact I've just done it here now to verify
Hello Roelof,
V>> Voyager with a command line parameter like:
V>> ... voyager.exe /p:masterpassword
V>> so, I should not type in my master password every time...
> In that case why don't you use an empty password, I've never tried
> that, but I heard that it worked.
1. That would be an extra hit
Hello Thomas,
>>> This will probably work (not tested).
V>> It DOES work :) I dont sent untested stuff here, to professionals :))
> I didn't doubt that! :-)
> But my point was that Voyager should do that, without the necessity of
> a batch file.
Oh, I see. Agree.
--
Vili
_
Hello Thomas,
V>> Create a .bat file, content:
V>> regedit /s voyager_key_ex.reg
V>> The .bat file should be in the same directory where your
V>> voyager_key_ex.reg . Run the .bat file.
> This will probably work (not tested).
It DOES work :) I dont sent untested stuff here, to professionals :))
Hello Nick,
>> 1. Sometimes I cannot change between tabs. I click on the name of the
>> next Tab, nothing happens...
> Yep, if you make any changes to a file you will not be able to tab
> away from it.
>> 2. I write something in it, and press Esc. "Data was not saved. Would
>> you like to abandon
hi Mary,
Sunday, July 30, 2006, 9:46:43 PM, you wrote:
> I understand. The initial reporter is given as "vitalie vrabie." I
> seem to remember that he's on the development team.
not anymore. long story. to cut it short, it's mindset-related. mine
pretends to be an industrial one in the shift to
Hello steverio,
Wednesday, January 4, 2006, 5:23:18 PM, you wrote:
>>S> For me, for some reason, TBV does not associate itself with a mailto:
>>S> by setting preferences there in the program. Even so, it does not list
>>S> itself in the registry as a recognized mail client. In order for IE6
>>TB
Maria...
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 16:35:23 +, you wrote:
>Hi steverio,
>
>On Wed, 04 Jan 2006 08:13:43 -0800GMT (04-01-2006, 16:13, where I
>live), you wrote:
>
>> I used to have GMail in TBV and it connected as well as TB, that is,
>> intermittently. I could not connect during some times such as
Hi steverio,
On Wed, 04 Jan 2006 08:13:43 -0800GMT (04-01-2006, 16:13, where I
live), you wrote:
> I used to have GMail in TBV and it connected as well as TB, that is,
> intermittently. I could not connect during some times such as peak
> Internet use. GMail was slower to connect than my ISP POP
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
