Re: Re[7]: Distributed "AS IS"

Hi Manuel, On 15/6/2005 10:32 PM +0200, you wrote: > Many would be very happy, you're right Allie! > When everything is working reliable concerning IMAP, TB! would be on > the step as Thunderbird and many other Clients are (concerning IMAP). You're right. TB! would be far better than Thunderbi

Re: Re[7]: Distributed "AS IS"

Hi Tony, --<> 15.06.2005 20:55 +0100: >> Mulberry becomes nearly unusable. This is especially true with the IMAP >> inbox. This behavior does not appear on my laptop, however. > > It doesn't happen here either, it's perhaps one of *the* most stable > programs I have on here. Have to confir

Re: Re[7]: Distributed "AS IS"

Hi Allie, --<> 15.06.2005 15:02 -0500: > What needs to improve as well, is reliability of the current > functionality across different setups and servers. It would seem that > there are quite a few who would be happy with TB!'s current IMAP > implementation if it would just work reliably. Ma

Re: Re[7]: Distributed "AS IS"

Hi Goncalo, On 15/6/2005 7:50 PM +0100, you wrote: > Well, putting out 3.5 surely didn't do any good to Ritlabs quality > image. In fact, seeing people in this list using Mulberry email client > isn't a good sign. I'm sure you'll agree on this. There are two reasons why one would not use T

Re: Re[7]: Distributed "AS IS"

Hello Gleason. --On 15 June 2005 12:46 -0700 you wrote about Re: Re[7]: Distributed "AS IS": > Mulberry becomes nearly unusable. This is especially true with the IMAP > inbox. This behavior does not appear on my laptop, however. It doesn't happen here either, it's

Re: Re[7]: Distributed "AS IS"

Goncalo, I disagree with you on this. I was a Ak-mail user and never had problems with it. I just switch from it to TB! because development was kind of dead and the English version isn't updated anymore. People here using Mulberry seem to be very happy. You may get their testimonial

Re[7]: Distributed "AS IS"

Hi Gleason, In reply to : >> But it's not the case here, is it? TB! problems are not located >> elsewhere, mainly TB! problems are, IMHO, due to radical changes >> and extreme anxiety to release a final version when major problems >> are still present. GP> Don't