Hi Goncalo, On 15/6/2005 7:50 PM +0100, you wrote: > Well, putting out 3.5 surely didn't do any good to Ritlabs quality > image. In fact, seeing people in this list using Mulberry email client > isn't a good sign. I'm sure you'll agree on this.
There are two reasons why one would not use TB! IMAP and move to using an alternative like Mulberry. - one is that it's buggy when being used. - the other is that its limited in features that would be very useful for the environment in which its being used. Currently, I don't have much problems with TB! IMAP's current capabilities working for me. I can run it without too much buggy behaviour to make the latter too much of a problem to not use it. However, the current features are rather limited and my using TB! now is based more on blind loyalty, rather than practical considerations. I can use it, but I prefer Mulberry. I'm pretty sure the features will improve and expand, hence my continued interest and input. I still contribute either from direct testing or from testimonials about how I do IMAP and how Mulberry helps me where TB! doesn't. Hopefully, this will assist with TB!'s IMAP development. What needs to improve as well, is reliability of the current functionality across different setups and servers. It would seem that there are quite a few who would be happy with TB!'s current IMAP implementation if it would just work reliably. -- Allie Martin System specs: http://www.ac-martin.com/sysspecs.htm -=-=- Defeat isn't bitter if you don't swallow it. ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.5.26 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
