Re: Resurrecting TB! after several days of no use

2005-10-24 Thread Curtis
On 23/10/2005 at 10:57:24 AM [GMT -0500], Martin Webster wrote: That's interesting... I was away for a few days last week and had a great deal of new messages. However, I was up and running in no time at all. I'm just now having problems with that beta. 10 new messages in the Inbox. 95 in

Resurrecting TB! after several days of no use

2005-10-23 Thread Curtis
Hi all, I was away for a few days and did no e-mail during that time. I therefore had over 1000 messages accumulated. It took about 20 minutes for TB!'s connection centre to settle down so that I could go ahead and read some mail without seeing too much of the 'no message loaded' screen.

Re: Resurrecting TB! after several days of no use

2005-10-23 Thread Tony Boom
On 23 Oct 2005, at 15:53, Curtis wrote: Hi all, Signed on Sunday, 23 October 2005 15:53:12 Europe/London You changed your key again, where can I get it please, can't find it on a server. -- Tony Boom Current beta is

Re: Resurrecting TB! after several days of no use

2005-10-23 Thread Tony Boom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 23 Oct 2005, at 16:01, Tony Boom wrote: You changed your key again, where can I get it please, can't find it on a server. Moron, next time read the signature... Sorry Allie. - -- Tony Boom -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: Resurrecting TB! after several days of no use

2005-10-23 Thread Martin Webster
Hello Curtis, On 23 October 2005, 15:53 you wrote: I was away for a few days and did no e-mail during that time. I therefore had over 1000 messages accumulated. It took about 20 minutes for TB!'s connection centre to settle down so that I could go ahead and read some mail without seeing

Re: Resurrecting TB! after several days of no use

2005-10-23 Thread Curtis
On 23/10/2005 at 10:57:24 AM [GMT -0500], Martin Webster wrote: That's interesting... I was away for a few days last week and had a great deal of new messages. However, I was up and running in no time at all. Interesting. I'm using 3.61.11 Echo because it is the best IMAP implementation to