Re: S/MIME signing

2003-10-29 Thread Kevin Coates
Hi Martin, On Oct 28, 2003, 19:47 + ( 2:47 PM here), Martin Webster [MW] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: MW I can no longer send using S/MIME. The password for my private key MW is no longer accepted. Can anyone confirm? I don't use S/MIME much but when I installed my Thawte certificate

Re[2]: S/MIME signing

2003-10-29 Thread Paul Cartwright
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Kevin, KC I don't use S/MIME much but when I installed my Thawte certificate KC they tested fine using The Bat's Internal Implementation. With this KC beta version my experience is the same as yours. Password not KC accepted. KC I changed the

Re: S/MIME signing

2003-10-29 Thread Martin Webster
Hello Kevin, On 29 October 2003, 12:42 -0500 ( 17:42 local time) Kevin Coates [KC] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MW I can no longer send using S/MIME. The password for my private key MW is no longer accepted. Can anyone confirm? KC I don't use S/MIME much but when I installed my Thawte

Re: S/MIME signing

2003-10-28 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Martin, @28-Oct-2003, 19:47 Martin Webster [MW] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: MW I can no longer send using S/MIME. The password for my private MW key is no longer accepted. Can anyone confirm? Seems fine here. Which API are you using? Internal or MSCrypto? (I'm using Internal). -- Cheers

Re: S/MIME signing

2003-10-28 Thread Martin Webster
Hello Marck, On 28 October 2003, 21:28 Marck D Pearlstone [MDP] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MDP mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: MW I can no longer send using S/MIME. The password for my private MW key is no longer accepted. Can anyone confirm? MDP Seems fine here. Which API are you using?

Re: S/MIME signing

2003-10-28 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Martin, @28-Oct-2003, 19:47 Martin Webster [MW] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: MW I can no longer send using S/MIME. The password for my private MW key is no longer accepted. Can anyone confirm? Trying again - that last one seems to have reverted to PGP/MIME :-/ -- Cheers -- .\\arck D

Re[2]: S/MIME signing

2003-10-28 Thread Alexander Leschinsky
Hello Marck, On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 01:41:29 + (29.10.2003 06:41 my local time) you wrote about S/MIME signing, at least in part: MDP Trying again Bur with SB! v2.01.12 :-) -- Best regards, Alexander Leschinsky Powered by The Bat! 2.01.7 Weakened by Windows 98 4.10. A - MOTD

Re: S/MIME signing

2003-10-28 Thread Alexander Leschinsky
Hello Martin, On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 19:47:26 + (29.10.2003 00:47 my local time) you wrote about S/MIME signing, at least in part: MW Can anyone confirm? Yes, with internal S/MIME Anybody will bugtrack it?! -- Best regards, Alexander Leschinsky Powered by The Bat! 2.01.7 Weakened

Re: S/MIME signing

2003-10-28 Thread Frank Weidmann
Hello Martin, hello tbbeta, I can no longer send using S/MIME. The password for my private key is no longer accepted. Can anyone confirm? no, work's fine here. IMO TB use PGP S/MIME only if you attach a file, otherwise it will be encoded to Standart PGP. CMIIW -- Regards Frank The

Re: S/MIME signing

2003-10-28 Thread Kevin Coates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Martin, On Oct 28, 2003, 19:47 + ( 2:47 PM here), Martin Webster [MW] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: MW I can no longer send using S/MIME. The password for my private key MW is no longer accepted. Can anyone confirm? I haven't tried it with