Re[2]: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-28 Thread Goncalo Farias
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Is thebat.net blocking itself? PG That's the way GMail works. You cannot send emails to yourself. I'm PG not sure why. Perhaps to avoid abuse. You already have the sent email... -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias The path to hell is paved with governm't

Re: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-10 Thread Peter Hampf
Answering a current message (Wednesday, October 10, 2007, 05:28) Hello Max, MM Any way, any mail server may store the messages, for example, for legal MM inspection by authorities. yes. It MAY. But that is not the matter of dispute. Privacy is a highly sensitive issue - and Google is known to

Re: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-10 Thread Krzysztof Trybowski
Hello Thomas, On Wednesday, October 10, 2007 Thomas Fernandez wrote: Why not? Your sent mail will be available through POP, so you'll be able to download it to voyager. Right. But when I get home, I download mymessages onto my home computer. If I have downloaded them already to Voyager, I

Re[2]: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-10 Thread Paul Van Noord
10/10/2007 4:29 AM Hi Thomas, On 10/9/2007 Thomas Fernandez wrote: Our goal is not to force a particular mail service, but to give an opportunity to easily create an account. TF The idea is not bad, but I think you chose the wrong email provider. Exactly! It makes no sense to me to beat up

Re[3]: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-10 Thread Paul Van Noord
10/10/2007 4:48 AM Hi Maxim, On 10/9/2007 Maxim Masiutin wrote: MM As I wrote a few times in TBBETA, this have to be resolved. By choosing an appropriate provider! -- Take Care, Paul Voyager v.3.99.4 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195 No IMAP OTFE

Re[3]: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-10 Thread Paul Van Noord
10/10/2007 4:39 AM Hi Maxim, On 10/9/2007 Maxim Masiutin wrote: But please take in mind, that all messages that are sent and received via this account will be stored endlessly on GOOGLE's server. (Unless the customer uses the web interface and removes them.) MM Any way, any mail server may

Re[4]: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-10 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Paul, Wednesday, October 10, 2007, 11:48:55, you wrote: MM As I wrote a few times in TBBETA, this have to be resolved. By choosing an appropriate provider! Which provider exactly can you recommend? -- Best regards, Maxim Masiutinmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re[5]: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-10 Thread Paul Van Noord
10/10/2007 6:17 AM Hi Maxim, On 10/10/2007 Maxim Masiutin wrote: By choosing an appropriate provider! MM Which provider exactly can you recommend? Good question! I would need to spend some time researching this which I am happy to do. One principle made clear to me in my 20 years as a

Re: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-10 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Krzysztof, On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:11:10 +0200 GMT (10/10/2007, 15:11 +0700 GMT), Krzysztof Trybowski wrote: Why not? Your sent mail will be available through POP, so you'll be able to download it to voyager. Right. But when I get home, I download mymessages onto my home computer. If I

Re: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-10 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Paul, On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 04:47:59 -0400 GMT (10/10/2007, 15:47 +0700 GMT), Paul Van Noord wrote: But please take in mind, that all messages that are sent and received via this account will be stored endlessly on GOOGLE's server. (Unless the customer uses the web interface and removes

Re[2]: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-10 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Thomas, Wednesday, October 10, 2007, 18:21:01, you wrote: Check the laws. In many countries, the provider is required to store the messages for a while, I believe it is 180 days in the EU right now, and at least that long in the US. For some reason, this is against terrorism. Thank you for

Re[2]: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-10 Thread Paul Van Noord
10/10/2007 6:28 PM Hi Peter, On 10/10/2007 Peter Hampf wrote: TF In many countries, the provider is required to store the messages for a TF while, I believe it is 180 days in the EU right now, PH Well, that is correct. But IMO that is not what we are talking about. The PH newly installed laws

Re[3]: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-10 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Paul, Wednesday, October 10, 2007, 1:31:44, you wrote: This is why I say TB needs a private host as opposed to a public one that makes its money off their users. Consider using mutemail.com host. -- Best regards, Maxim Masiutinmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-09 Thread Krzysztof Trybowski
Hello tombkk, On Tuesday, October 9, 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can work it around. Just prefix your username with recent: For example for account named [EMAIL PROTECTED] you'd use username recent:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Where do I set this? In the From account? No, as username in POP3

Re: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-09 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Krzysztof, On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 14:38:33 +0200 GMT (09/10/2007, 19:38 +0700 GMT), Krzysztof Trybowski wrote: You can work it around. Just prefix your username with recent: For example for account named [EMAIL PROTECTED] you'd use username recent:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Where do I set this? In

Re[4]: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-09 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Paul, Monday, October 08, 2007, 5:12:56, you wrote: It also has gmail quirks. Is the message base on their servers encrypted? Are the calendar and addresses/contacts encrypted? If so, to what depth? Encrypted transmission is worthless if the rest of it isn't encrypted, preferably at 256

Re[2]: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-09 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Thomas, Tuesday, October 09, 2007, 4:34:02, you wrote: So does GMX... Does GMX provide an opportunity to create an e-mail account solely from a mail client software? Our goal is not to force a particular mail service, but to give an opportunity to easily create an account. -- Best

Re[5]: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-09 Thread Paul Van Noord
10/9/2007 1:58 PM Hi Maxim, On 10/9/2007 Maxim Masiutin wrote: MM We do not force to use GMail, we simply offer an opportunity to MM easily create a mail account using only the email program, MM i.e. without opening a web browser. It isn't automatic when one must log into webmail and search

Re[6]: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-09 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Paul, Tuesday, October 09, 2007, 21:03:52, you wrote: It isn't automatic when one must log into webmail and search through the options to enable POP and then be asked questions they have no clue as to how to answer. As I already wrote to the list, this have to be resolved. -- Best

Re: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-09 Thread Krzysztof Trybowski
Hello Thomas, On Tuesday, October 9, 2007 Thomas Fernandez wrote: If you enable POP in Gmail, you can select either that all messages in account are available through POP, or that only messages received from that moment on are available. When I enabled POP, I set it to all messages. Yes,

Re[2]: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-09 Thread Paul Van Noord
10/9/2007 7:54 PM Hi Peter, On 10/9/2007 Peter Hampf wrote: MM Our goal is not to force a particular mail service, but to give an MM opportunity to easily create an account. PH Max, this is - in general - a reasonable good idea. PH But please take in mind, that all messages that are sent

Re: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-09 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Krzysztof, On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 00:11:24 +0200 GMT (10/10/2007, 05:11 +0700 GMT), Krzysztof Trybowski wrote: If you enable POP in Gmail, you can select either that all messages in account are available through POP, or that only messages received from that moment on are available. When

Re: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-09 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Maxim, On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 20:27:35 +0300 GMT (10/10/2007, 00:27 +0700 GMT), Maxim Masiutin wrote: So does GMX... Does GMX provide an opportunity to create an e-mail account solely from a mail client software? Probably not. However, I believe Gmail is not suitable for your purpose due

Re[2]: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-09 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Peter, Tuesday, October 09, 2007, 23:06:55, you wrote: But please take in mind, that all messages that are sent and received via this account will be stored endlessly on GOOGLE's server. (Unless the customer uses the web interface and removes them.) Any way, any mail server may store the

Re[2]: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-09 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Thomas, Wednesday, October 10, 2007, 5:29:24, you wrote: And I'd rather log into the web interface in order to create and setup an account once, than every time I need to receive messages on a second computer. The whole purpose of your project (creating from email client, no need to log

Re: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Maxim, On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 06:35:13 +0300 GMT (08/10/2007, 10:35 +0700 GMT), Maxim Masiutin wrote: MM We have adjusted the SPF for thebat.net, could you please check MM this out and let us know the results? I don't seem to receive my own message sent from thebat.net at my thebat.net

Re[2]: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-08 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Thomas, A reminder of what Thomas Fernandez typed on: Monday, October 08, 2007 at 22:37:57 GMT +0700 TF I don't seem to receive my own message sent from thebat.net at my TF thebat.net address. This is true for both PMs to myself as well as the TF messages I sent to TBBETA. TF I have

Re: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-08 Thread Peter Gannushkin
Hi Thomas, I don't seem to receive my own message sent from thebat.net at my thebat.net address. This is true for both PMs to myself as well as the messages I sent to TBBETA. Is thebat.net blocking itself? That's the way GMail works. You cannot send emails to yourself. I'm not sure why. --

Re: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Peter, On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 11:50:15 -0400 GMT (08/10/2007, 22:50 +0700 GMT), Peter Gannushkin wrote: Is thebat.net blocking itself? PG That's the way GMail works. You cannot send emails to yourself. I'm PG not sure why. Then why did Ritlabs choose Gmail? I was planning to use that

Re: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-08 Thread Costas Papadopoulos
Hello Maxim, Monday, October 8, 2007, 6:35:13 AM, you wrote (possibly edited): We have adjusted the SPF for thebat.net, could you please check this out and let us know the results? I confirm that there are no problems receving and sending messages from/to thebat.net. -- Best regards

Re: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-08 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Thomas, on Mon, 8 Oct 2007 23:00:02 +0700GMT (08.10.2007, 18:00 +0200GMT here), you wrote: TF On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 11:50:15 -0400 GMT (08/10/2007, 22:50 +0700 GMT), TF Peter Gannushkin wrote: Is thebat.net blocking itself? PG That's the way GMail works. You cannot send emails to yourself.

Re[2]: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-08 Thread Bob Riley
Hi Peter, Monday, October 8, 2007, 9:50:15 AM, you wrote: Hi Thomas, I don't seem to receive my own message sent from thebat.net at my thebat.net address. This is true for both PMs to myself as well as the messages I sent to TBBETA. Is thebat.net blocking itself? That's the way GMail

Re: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Peter, On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 18:43:43 +0200 GMT (08/10/2007, 23:43 +0700 GMT), Peter Meyns wrote: TF Then why did Ritlabs choose Gmail? I was planning to use that address TF for my five TB! mailing lists. Looks like the attempt is futile. You can work around it by filtering your sent mail

Re[2]: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-08 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Thomas, Monday, October 08, 2007, 19:00:02, you wrote: Then why did Ritlabs choose Gmail? I was planning to use that address for my five TB! mailing lists. Looks like the attempt is futile. Ritlabs is currently the best among mail providers: it offers good anti-spam, and encrypted SMTP

Re: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-08 Thread Krzysztof Trybowski
Hello Thomas, On Monday, October 8, 2007 Thomas Fernandez wrote: Hello Maxim, On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 06:35:13 +0300 GMT (08/10/2007, 10:35 +0700 GMT), Maxim Masiutin wrote: MM We have adjusted the SPF for thebat.net, could you please check MM this out and let us know the results? I don't seem

Re: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-08 Thread Thomas Martin
Hello Maxim, on Monday, 8. October 2007, at 05:35:38 [GMT +0200] you wrote regarding SPF for thebat.net: We have adjusted the SPF for thebat.net, could you please check this out and let us know the results? no problems sending and receiving. -- Ciao Thomas Using: TheBat! 3.99.24

Re: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Maxim, On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 21:24:18 +0300 GMT (09/10/2007, 01:24 +0700 GMT), Maxim Masiutin wrote: Then why did Ritlabs choose Gmail? I was planning to use that address for my five TB! mailing lists. Looks like the attempt is futile. Ritlabs is currently the best among mail providers: it

Re: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-08 Thread tombkk
Hello Krzysztof, On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 22:41:24 +0200 GMT (09/10/2007, 03:41 +0700 GMT), Krzysztof Trybowski wrote: I don't seem to receive my own message sent from thebat.net at my thebat.net address. This is true for both PMs to myself as well as the messages I sent to TBBETA. I have

Re[3]: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-08 Thread Paul Van Noord
10/8/2007 10:05 PM Hi Maxim, On 10/8/2007 Maxim Masiutin wrote: MM Ritlabs is currently the best among mail providers: it offers MM good anti-spam, and encrypted SMTP connection to the server. It also has gmail quirks. Is the message base on their servers encrypted? Are the calendar and

Re: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Peter, On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 18:43:43 +0200 GMT (08/10/2007, 23:43 +0700 GMT), Peter Meyns wrote: PM You can work around it by filtering your sent mail to the list PM folder. You won't know however, if or when your message made it to PM the list. IF (big if) I were to use a workaround by way

SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-07 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Tbbeta, We have adjusted the SPF for thebat.net, could you please check this out and let us know the results? -- Best regards, Maxim Masiutin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using

Re: SPF for thebat.net

2007-10-07 Thread Bob Riley
Hi Maxim, Sunday, October 7, 2007, 9:35:13 PM, you wrote: Hello Tbbeta, We have adjusted the SPF for thebat.net, could you please check this out and let us know the results? I had no trouble receiving mail from my thebat.net account with AOL, Yahoo, Gmail or MSN. The headers for gmail