Dear Peter,
-- Donnerstag, 20. Dezember 2007, 21:27:52:
I received 21 messages on this list created after Dec 12, if that
helps...
25 after Dec. 12. and without this treat
--
best regards | Using The Bat! 3.95.6
www.EddieCastelli.com | on Windows 2000 5.0
.
So, I'm sending this test message, hoping it will be sent
back to me so that I may check to see if volume is low or
if there is some other strange issue. My email provider
is also watching to see if this (or any) message is received
from the list as well.
--
Steven Vallière | tb 3.99.29 | mailto
Hi Steven,
on Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:38:30 -0500GMT (20.12.2007, 19:38 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
SPV ... I've seen only one message here since Dec 12, 2007 and _that_
SPV was four days ago.
SPV ...
I received 21 messages on this list created after Dec 12, if that helps...
--
Cheers
Peter
The
Hello Steven,
Thursday, December 20, 2007, 20:38:30, you wrote:
Either the volume of messages on this list is approaching
zero, or something is intercepting them before they get to
my local mail server.
You can compare the volume of messages with a mailing list archive at
Hello Stuart,
A reminder of what Stuart Cuddy typed on:
Thursday, January 26, 2006 at 20:06:50 GMT -0600
SC Hello tbbeta,
SC Testing duplicates.
I think that another bad thing is happening with these duplicates.
Since these are not true duplicates in the strictest sense, (ie they
are not
Hello Stuart,
SC Testing duplicates.
I think that another bad thing is happening with these duplicates.
Since these are not true duplicates in the strictest sense, (ie they
are not on the server, just in the local folder) if you delete
one of the messages, manually or by using Delete
Hello Vili,
A reminder of what Vili typed on:
Monday, January 30, 2006 at 13:55:57 GMT -0500
V Maybe it is a strange question, but as I NEVER seen this duplication
V before: if this is a test IMAP address for you, would it be possible
V to get it as a TBK file, so I can test it at
Hello Stuart,
V Maybe it is a strange question, but as I NEVER seen this duplication
V before: if this is a test IMAP address for you, would it be possible
V to get it as a TBK file, so I can test it at home with the same
V settings, that you have at you?
It is not strictly a test
Hello Vili,
A reminder of what Vili typed on:
Monday, January 30, 2006 at 15:41:44 GMT -0500
V Stuart: could you generate me up a new IMAP fastmail account, set it in
V your TB, reproduce the problem with it, and backup the account and
V send as attach in private?
I will see what I can do.
Stuart,
On 30-01-2006 18:58, you [SC] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
SC Since these are not true duplicates in the strictest sense, (ie they
SC are not on the server, just in the local folder) if you delete one
SC of the messages, manually or by using Delete Duplicates, when you do
SC a purge it
On Monday, January 30, 2006, 3:08:52 PM, Stuart Cuddy wrote:
I am only going to try it once though. :)
If you are lucky, it will work 1st try.
Re your other question, for the brief time I had any duplicate
problems, killing duplicates never deleted any messages, but manually
deleting messages
Hello Stuart,
V Stuart: could you generate me up a new IMAP fastmail account, set it in
V your TB, reproduce the problem with it, and backup the account and
V send as attach in private?
I will see what I can do. There are 9 copies of your message plus the
original. I am only going to try it
On 30 January 2006 at 17:58, Stuart wrote:
I think that another bad thing is happening with these duplicates.
Since these are not true duplicates in the strictest sense, (ie they
are not on the server, just in the local folder) if you delete
one of the messages, manually or by using Delete
Hello Dwight,
Monday, January 30, 2006, 3:59:43 PM, you wrote:
DAC Re your other question, for the brief time I had any duplicate
DAC problems, killing duplicates never deleted any messages, but manually
DAC deleting messages was kind of hit or miss as I recall.
It is not actually a problem
Hello Peter,
Monday, January 30, 2006, 3:14:49 PM, you wrote:
PF Hmm, I am often using remove duplicates without having all versions
PF disappear.
It is only after a purge that the message on the server disappears
and then with a second purge the original message in the local cache
Hello Stuart,
A reminder of what Stuart Cuddy typed on:
Saturday, January 28, 2006 at 16:07:01 GMT -0600
9 Could you check if issue was solved in .06?
SC Sorry it is not completely fixed. I just received 3 new IMAP TB!
SC messages and one of them has a duplicate. In trying to mark them all
9Val,
On 28-01-2006 16:24, you [9] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
SC Testing duplicates.
9 Could you check if issue was solved in .06?
IMAP seems to be running faster but alas I am getting more duplicates
now than ever: usually one in the inbox and two in the folder it is
filtered to (one
Peter,
On 30-01-2006 08:20, you [PF] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
PF IMAP seems to be running faster but alas I am getting more
PF duplicates now than ever: usually one in the inbox and two in the
PF folder it is filtered to (one ghost message).
Setting flags (marking as read for instance,
Hello Stuart,
SC Testing duplicates.
Could you check if issue was solved in .06?
--
9Val
Current beta is 3.70.06 quot;Qigongquot; | 'Using TBBETA' information:
Hi 9Val,
On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 17:24:07 +0200 UTC (1/28/2006, 9:24 AM -0500 UTC my
time), 9Val wrote:
SC Testing duplicates.
9 Could you check if issue was solved in .06?
There are no dups now, working well... thanks, IMAP seems much improved
overall.
However there is still a major problem.
Hello 9Val,
A reminder of what 9Val typed on:
Saturday, January 28, 2006 at 17:24:07 GMT +0200
SC Testing duplicates.
9 Could you check if issue was solved in .06?
Sorry it is not completely fixed. I just received 3 new IMAP TB!
messages and one of them has a duplicate. In trying to mark
Stuart,
On 27-01-2006 03:24, you [SC] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
SC Can anyone using IMAP, confirm my findings.
I can. Just this morning. Reverted.
--
greeting Best regards /greeting
author Peter Fjelsten /author
thebat version 3.70.02 Qigong (Beta) Pro /thebat version
env. ~4 POP3, 7
Hello Dwight,
Thursday, January 26, 2006, 11:29:58 PM, you wrote:
DAC I marked your test message unread, making it the only unread message
DAC in my account. I then hit alt-f2, which checks mail for all accounts
DAC and did not duplicate your complaint.
DAC I don't understand why you are using
Hello Stuart,
Friday, January 27, 2006, 8:10:36 AM, you wrote:
This makes it difficult to test where color filtering is failing as
well.
Also forgot to mention that if I use remove duplicates it works, but
often keeps the duplicate and not the original, so all coloring is
useless.
On 27 January 2006 at 14:10, Stuart wrote:
I don't usually check this way, I only did it to expedite the problem.
This morning I downloaded my new mail, 9 new messages. While I was
reading some other mail an automatic refresh was done and my TB
account still shows 9 messages,
Hello tbbeta,
Testing duplicates.
--
Stuart mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v3.70.03 Qigong (Beta) on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service
Pack 4
Current beta is 3.70.03 quot;Qigongquot; | 'Using
On 26/1/2006 at 9:06:50 PM [GMT -0500], Stuart Cuddy wrote:
Testing duplicates.
Have you done any cleaning of the local cache?
I haven't seen duplicates in a long time.
--
-= Curtis =-
The Bat! v3.70.02 Qigong(Beta) / http://specs.aimlink.name
PGPKey: http://rsakey.aimlink.name
...Ok, I
Hello Stuart,
Thursday, January 26, 2006, 8:06:50 PM, you wrote:
SC Testing duplicates.
I sent the test message at which time I had 0 unread messages in my TB
folder. When the message arrived, it showed up as 1 message in my TB
folder where it was filtered upon arrival. My inbox showed
Hello Curtis,
Thursday, January 26, 2006, 8:19:30 PM, you wrote:
Testing duplicates.
C Have you done any cleaning of the local cache?
C I haven't seen duplicates in a long time.
Could you check as described in my just sent message. I can reproduce
as described in that message.
--
Stuart
On Thursday, January 26, 2006, 8:24:37 PM, Stuart Cuddy wrote:
I then pressed F2 (My Shortcut) to Check New mail for All, at
which point a duplicate appeared in my TB folder, although the
count in the folder remained as 1. The Inbox however changed to 0
(2).
I marked your test
Hello Stuart!
On Tuesday, November 16, 2004 at 1:53:22 PM you wrote:
AM Just a test. Ignore if you can. :)
Tried. Couldn't. 8-)
I could, I could. :bounce-cheshire:
--
Dierk Haasis
:Dierk: Copy 'n' Concept
The Bat 3.0.2.7 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2
Chat info for ICQ, AIM,
Hello Batlisters,
Please ignore.
--
Best regards,
David
** VirusScan: MS Windows found. Delete? (Y/y) **
[TB! 2.01.20] [Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4]
[Running on a PIV [EMAIL PROTECTED] 512 Mb RAM]
Current
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Allie,
On Saturday, March 24, 2001 at 21:02:32 -0500 GMT (9:02 PM my local
time) you wrote:
ACM Hi,
ACM This is just a test message for the list which seems to have been
ACM down.
Your test message made it through, but there doesn't seem to be any
Hallo Kevin,
Op Sunday, March 25, 2001, om 7:11:00 PM, schreef jij een en ander over 'Test message'
:
ACM This is just a test message for the list which seems to have been
ACM down.
KC Your test message made it through, but there doesn't seem to be any
KC other activity.
At least that's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Cees,
On Sunday, March 25, 2001 at 19:20:24 +0200 GMT (12:20 PM my local
time) you wrote:
CS At least that's something, since my messages never seem to make it
CS through at all. I only receive, but cannot send. ;-)
In this instance, Cees, it seems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
This is just a test message for the list which seems to have been
down.
- --
- Allie -
~~~
A. Curtis Martin | Moderator(TBUDL|TBBETA|TBTECH)
Opinions given are mine and not necessarily those
Hello Stefan Tanurkov,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 13:48:58 +0200 GMT your local time,
which was Monday, January 17, 2000, 6:48:58 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Stefan Tanurkov wrote:
Stefan Hello tracer,
that means gamma is after beta:
t In the alphabet, yes, I just never heard it being used before
37 matches
Mail list logo
