February 9, 2010
There appears to be some relationship between the scheduler
component and delayed sending problem.
I just cleaned out a lot of very old scheduled and sent notes in the
scheduler. Now the program runs much quicker.
Just waiting to see the delay mailing test
February 8, 2010
A group of e-mail scheduled at various times this morning did not go
out at all.
Some red faces here in the office.
This is the first time I've run into this problem.
Any one else?
Running Beta 4.2.33.7 on Windows 7, 32 Bit.
Jerry
--
Ethan J Mings
February 8, 2010
A group of e-mail scheduled at various times this morning did not go
out at all.
Some red faces here in the office.
This is the first time I've run into this problem.
Any one else?
It been flakey for a long time. It will stop for no reason although I am
A group of e-mail scheduled at various times this morning did not
go out at all. Some red faces here in the office.
Solution/to learn: dont use beta version for important things.
Current beta is 4.2.33.7 | 'Using TBBETA'
[Reply to: »Rick« · 2009-06-15 · 19:18 h (CET)]
Moin, Rick!
[Trouble with delayed sending]
I am getting so frustrated with this. In some beta releases it has
worked perfectly, and the next release of an EXE will totally break
it (form me at least) and I have no idea of why.
Tonight I did
Hello all,
Tuesday, June 16, 2009, Volker Ahrendt wrote:
- Creation date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:12:05 +0200
- Delay time:plus 1 hour
= Message should have been sent 23:12:05 +0200. – Now (23:27) the
message is still in the outbox, i.e. TEST FAILED.
I have set +5min and message was sent
Hello all,
Tuesday, June 16, 2009, Volker Ahrendt wrote:
- Creation date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:12:05 +0200
- Delay time:plus 1 hour
= Message should have been sent 23:12:05 +0200. – Now (23:27) the
message is still in the outbox, i.e. TEST FAILED.
check Scheduller if there is a task
On dinsdag 16 juni 2009, 11:41:31 PM Marek Mikus wrote,
= Message should have been sent 23:12:05 +0200. – Now (23:27) the
message is still in the outbox, i.e. TEST FAILED.
I have set +5min and message was sent correctly
Strange. Volker put = in his message, but your quote made = of
it,
on startup
Execute actions for missed event is checked
The delayed sending is completely broken for me
--
Rick
Never deprive someone of hope; it might be all they have. - H. Jackson Brown Jr.
v4.2.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 3
I am having trouble with delayed sending too; it has apparently
stopped working in the last couple of builds. However 3 out of 5
scheduled went out a half hour late yesterday, the other 2 having to be sent
manually. Go figure.
I set batches of 5 emails to go out tomorrow at 9 am and 2 pm
Hello Rick,
I am having trouble with delayed sending too; it has apparently
stopped working in the last couple of builds. However 3 out of 5
scheduled went out a half hour late yesterday, the other 2 having to be sent
manually. Go figure.
I set batches of 5 emails to go out tomorrow at 9
Hello Rick,
I am having trouble with delayed sending too; it has apparently
stopped working in the last couple of builds. However 3 out of 5
scheduled went out a half hour late yesterday, the other 2 having to be sent
manually. Go figure.
I set batches of 5 emails to go out tomorrow at 9
Every message was sent no one was lost.
I had 5 messages timed to go out at 2 pm. 2 went out at 2:11. The other 3 are
still in the outbox.
Anyone have any ideas? There is a user on TBUDL with another same problem of
setting a message to go out at a future time and in doesn't go.
What might
between creating the
mails and sending them? Has the computer been in standby or in
hibernation mode and has been restarted before the mails ought to be
sent? Has Windows been restarted? Has the screen saver been activated?
I have no idea how any of these actions might influence delayed
sending
the program between creating the
mails and sending them? Has the computer been in standby or in
hibernation mode and has been restarted before the mails ought to be
sent? Has Windows been restarted? Has the screen saver been activated?
I have no idea how any of these actions might influence delayed
On Monday, June 15, 2009, 2:39:50 PM, mse wrote:
Did you or the other user close the program between creating the
mails and sending them?
I know that I have to close the program often, because that is the
only to get counts updated, new mail colleccted, and messages which
have been
On Monday, June 15, 2009, 2:39:50 PM, mse wrote:
Did you or the other user close the program between creating the
mails and sending them? Has the computer been in standby or in
hibernation mode and has been restarted before the mails ought to be
sent? Has Windows been restarted? Has the
I am having trouble with delayed sending; it has apparently stopped working in
the last couple of builds.
I set batches of 5 emails to go out tomorrow at 9 am and 2 pm respectively.
They won't go unless I UNPARK them, then they will go immediately irregardless
of the delay time.
Anyone else
First of all, my sent mail is wierd, because it always shows the
received time an hour later than the created date, including when it's
not during daylight savings time.
Yesterday at 9:14 am, I sent myself a message, to be dispatched at 8
am tomorrow (today). The message was sent today,
, which was composed at the same time, and
set to be sent in 24 hours, by the custom setting. This message is
still sitting in the outbox, (it is currently about 11:35 am
Thursday).
I am having trouble with delayed sending too; it has apparently stopped working
in the last couple
On Thursday, June 11, 2009, 11:34:47 AM, Dwight Corrin wrote:
There is a second message, which was composed at the same time, and
set to be sent in 24 hours, by the custom setting. This message is
still sitting in the outbox, (it is currently about 11:35 am
Thursday).
it
Hi Rick
On Monday, May 25, 2009 11:39:58 PM you wrote:
Has anyone else noticed that delayed sending seems totally broken in this
release? (4.1.14.1)
Can't confirm. I'll send this message with 15min delay.
--
Best regards,
Martin
dagob...@yahoo.com
TheBat! 4.1.14.1 (RC1) Pro (no OTFE
On Monday, May 25, 2009, 4:39:58 PM, Rick wrote:
Has anyone else noticed that delayed sending seems totally broken in
this release? (4.1.14.1)
Seems like a fair statement to me. See 1514908674.20090521173...@fastmail.fm
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin
Hi Rick
On Monday, May 25, 2009 11:39:58 PM you wrote:
Has anyone else noticed that delayed sending seems totally broken in this
release? (4.1.14.1)
Can't confirm. I'll send this message with 15min delay.
I sent one with a 15 minute delay yesterday and it didn't go out on time
I set 5
Hello Rick,
Tuesday, May 26, 2009, 5:03:41 PM, among other things, you wrote:
R Has anyone else noticed that delayed sending seems totally broken in this
release? (4.1.14.1)
Cannot confirm, a delayed message sent to myself went out as programmed.
--
Best regards,
Roger
Has anyone else noticed that delayed sending seems totally broken in this
release? (4.1.14.1)
--
Rick
Love is the delightful interval between meeting a beautiful girl and
discovering that she looks like a haddock. - John Barrymore
v4.1.14.1 (RC1) on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 3
Volker Ahrendt schrieb:
Moin, folks!
I do not know exactly, when this occured the first time, but today I
noticed, that sending an e-mail takes some seconds (15-20s) before the
transfer actually starts. Normally the transfer used to start
immediately. See the log:
snip
27.08.2008,
Moin, folks!
I do not know exactly, when this occured the first time, but today I
noticed, that sending an e-mail takes some seconds (15-20s) before the
transfer actually starts. Normally the transfer used to start
immediately. See the log:
snip
27.08.2008, 15:42:10: SEND - sending mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Monday, May 14, 2001, 7:09:52 PM, David Elliott wrote:
Why don't they replace the OS whilst they are at it ? vbg
Hahaha, good call !! I too think they should :) :P
- --
PGP Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=send_PGP_key
If Bill Gates
29 matches
Mail list logo
