DEAD HORSE (was Re: 1.44)

2000-05-29 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
Hi MaXxX, On 28 May 2000 at 22:30:07 GMT +0200 (which was 21:30 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject of "1.44": M Hello phil and all you Batters out there. p Yeah the add-on program should have been written by "microsoft" but p they call all these exploits

Re: Address book.

2000-05-29 Thread Tony Boom
29/05/2000 13:19 GMT. Hello TBBETA, In an attempt to recover some of my email addresses I decided to restore the OE5 .wab from the backup I made. Along with this in the Windows/Application/Microsoft/Address Book directory was an ABD file. So,

Re: 1.44

2000-05-29 Thread Jast
Morning Stefan Tanurkov, The problem is that a single "stupid" user on a single machine (i.e. without administrator) should not have easy access to this feature. Okay, but what about the average "knows what he is doing" user (like me) I'm educated enough to know what attachments I can open

Re[8]: 1.44

2000-05-29 Thread tracer
Hello Stefan Tanurkov, On Mon, 29 May 2000 08:08:38 +0300 GMT your local time, which was Monday, May 29, 2000, 12:08:38 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Stefan Tanurkov wrote: Hello tracer, t But I donot agree having to go into the registry to change it. t There IS an administrators menu

Re[8]: 1.44

2000-05-29 Thread Thomas Speer
Hallo Stefan, Am 29.05.2000 um 07:08 Uhr, schriebst Du: ST Hello tracer, t But I donot agree having to go into the registry to change it. t There IS an administrators menu somewhere anyway, why not add this to t it? ST The problem is that a single "stupid" user on a single machine (i.e.

Re: 1.44

2000-05-29 Thread Christopher J. Trybowski
Hello tracer, On Monday, May 29, 2000 you wrote: t You would if you are an administrator and have more then one system... And you'd like to click thousands of checkboxes? Hmm, interesting, I usually do it once, export the registry and import it other systems... t imagine the fun if someone

Re: 1.44

2000-05-29 Thread Christopher J. Trybowski
Hello tracer, On Monday, May 29, 2000 you wrote: t But I donot agree having to go into the registry to change it. t There IS an administrators menu somewhere anyway, why not add this t to it? I don't know guys what's the problem. Is there any? You edit such properties once and then

Re: 1.44

2000-05-29 Thread Christopher J. Trybowski
Hello Thomas, On Monday, May 29, 2000 you wrote: TS Hallo Stefan, TS Am 29.05.2000 um 07:08 Uhr, schriebst Du: ST Hello tracer, t But I donot agree having to go into the registry to change it. t There IS an administrators menu somewhere anyway, why not add this to t it? ST The problem is

Stef, Max: address book and templates

2000-05-29 Thread Andreas Schwartmann
Salve to you Bat folks, I forward a message from Florian Effenberger: -- Thanks to Andreas Schwartmann for posting this to TBUDL. I have not much time at the moment to read mailing lists and so I have asked him to post it for me as he reads TBUDL regularly. This posting is originated from

Re[2]: 1.44

2000-05-29 Thread MaXxX
Hello Christopher and all you Batters out there. TS I have no Problem with editing the registry, but I know a lot of TS users that are using windows quite a lot and haven't even seen the TS registry on their system. CJT Which means that they green. And such inexperienced users shouldn't CJT

Re: Stef, Max: address book and templates

2000-05-29 Thread Dieter Hummel
Hello List Members, on 29.05.2000 at 17:49, Andreas Schwartmann wrote: recently I have developed a little annoying behaviour in The Bat! 1.44. I have three groups in my address book for three types of Why /did/ he develop such behavior when he's going to complain about that afterwards?