Hello bats,
on Fri, 20. Feb 2004 at 03:00:50 +0100 Peter Ouwehand wrote:
P Is this just me?? using the 'autosave draft' option we dealt (...) with
P before?
This happened also to me, not with the release version, but with some
beta version where it should had been already fixed.
That was while
Hi,
z0mbie wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
sorry, i sent that by mistake, i was going to test AV plugin and mixed
up messages :]
Frankly, I don't like that. Sending out a virus/trojan by mistake (and
to an email list) is hard to tolerate. It also doesn't make it any
better that z0mbie
Hello bats,
on Fri, 20. Feb 2004 at 03:07:17 +0100 Peter Ouwehand wrote:
P Using Shift-home (pos1 ...) positions the cursor to the leftmost
P pos on the line, and that QT inserted text is not highlighted.
P After going to the end of the line again, then shift-home again, it
P seems to work fine
Hi list
Would be nice when TheBat could support also long mailto's - like
mailto:Martin Schoch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
so the name and the EMail address is inserted in the TO field of a
message.
As you can see above: As soon as a blank character is in the string,
the mailto stops to interpret
Attention!
It seems you have got a virus on your machine!
Please make sure you have the latest update of your virus scanner
and check all your files right away!
Take care,
z0mbie
Current beta is 2.04.04 | 'Using TBBETA'
Hi Stefan!
On 19 Feb 2004 20:40:14 (my local time 19:40:14), you typed:
ST
The next version is scheduled for release in mid-April. And we have
ST a lot of things to do.
What
i hope for is that the layout and interface doesn't change so that we blind can't use it. As it is now, TB is
Hello Martin,
On Friday, February 20, 2004 at 12:50:02 PM you [MS] wrote (at least
in part):
MS Would be nice when TheBat could support also long mailto's - like
MSmailto:Martin Schoch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, in fact. this would be nice.
Maybe something like
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or
Hi Peter
On Friday, February 20, 2004 1:27:52 PM you wrote:
would be a good idea to use? OK, it might not look /that/ nice to
read for a human, but at least it would be somehow RFC oriented,
because it respects encoding of special characters in URLs.
As you perhaps have seen - this works
Hello The Bat! - Betalist,
* me myself wrote:
Attention!
It seems you have got a virus on your machine!
Sorry for this one. This message was generated by my AV-Plugin and
caused by:
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now I've changed my Anti-Virus settings and disabled the notification
message.
--
Hi Martin,
MS Would be nice when TheBat could support also long mailto's - like
MSmailto:Martin Schoch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accordingly to RFC 2368, it should be like this:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
All the Best!
Stefan
You'll know if you married a virgin, as when she wakes she will
Hi Stefan
On Friday, February 20, 2004 2:12:11 PM you wrote:
Accordingly to RFC 2368, it should be like this:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So the
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] is too short,
because the ?to= is missing?
But TheBat seems also to support the shorter string - as far as I
could
Hi Martin,
MS So the problem seems, how close to RFC 2368 other clients are
MS calling Thebat when it is the mailto handler...
Exactly. RFC2368 also states that spaces MUST NOT be used in URLs and
replaced by %20. Here is a link to the document:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2368.txt
--
Regards,
Hello Martin,
On Friday, February 20, 2004 at 1:37:17 PM you [MS] wrote (at least in
part):
would be a good idea to use? OK, it might not look /that/ nice to
read for a human, but at least it would be somehow RFC oriented,
because it respects encoding of special characters in URLs.
MS As you
Hi Markus:
sorry, i sent that by mistake, i was going to test AV plugin and mixed
up messages :]
MG Frankly, I don't like that. Sending out a virus/trojan by mistake (and
MG to an email list) is hard to tolerate.
I don't know if Zombie meant to do this on purpose. I recently noticed
that
Hello ken,
There are three available answers to any and/or question:
A, B, A and B.
Not sure what yes is supposed to mean here.
Sorry, I meant Ctrl-F - Message Finder, the subject of this thread. F7
is for Find Text.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The
Hello James,
My apologies. As we are posting in tbbeta, I had incorrectly
assumed you to be participating in the beta program.
I follow TBBeta quite closely and I wish I could participate in beta
testing. But email is my main tool for work and I can't (I can but I
shouldn't) take any risk.
Hello The Bat! beta users and developers,
On the Hungarian TB! mailing list a user reported this error message:
It seems that something is present in your registry, but it is not
enough or corrupted!
TB displays it after every start of the program, after that it runs correctly.
Anyone with
Hi Alexander
On Friday, February 20, 2004 4:45:16 PM you wrote:
MS Would be nice when TheBat could support also long mailto's
Such type of mailto URL violates RFC URL encodings scheme, thus - I
hope, it will be NEVER supported in RFC-compliant mailer
A second remark.
Well, you are
Hello Markus,
Friday, February 20, 2004, 8:58:13 AM, you wrote:
I use your latest build 2.04.04 and cannot use the message finder
anymore.
Everytime I try to seek something within my messages, my Bat freezes
and must be closed the hard way by Ctrl+Alt+Del.
On the computer I am at presently
MAU wrote:
Sorry, I meant Ctrl-F - Message Finder, the subject of this thread. F7
is for Find Text.
Hmm... For me, Ctrl+F and F7 are the same thing - both Message Finder
when in message list, both find text with a specific message open.
Is that not the same for you? Sorry if I'm confusing
Hi SyP,
on Fri, 20 Feb 2004 20:35:30 +0100GMT, you wrote:
S On the Hungarian TB! mailing list a user reported this error message:
S It seems that something is present in your registry, but it is not
S enough or corrupted!
S TB displays it after every start of the program, after that it runs
Hello Martin,
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:52:00 +0100 (20.02.2004 21:52 my local time)
you wrote about Support of long mailto ?,
at least in part:
MS a mailto in this way will is
MS already supported:
MS mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
?to parameter is not required, only _can_ be used
I spoke
On Friday, February 20, 2004, ken green wrote...
Sorry, I meant Ctrl-F - Message Finder, the subject of this thread. F7
is for Find Text.
Hmm... For me, Ctrl+F and F7 are the same thing - both Message
Finder when in message list, both find text with a specific message
open.
Is that not
Hello Jonathan,
Friday, February 20, 2004, 11:57:39 AM, you wrote:
JA Wrong button? This looks like a new message to me ;)
DOH! grin
Yep, it was supposed to be a mod on the sig delimiter. My bad.
--
Leif (TB list moderator and fellow end user).
Using The Bat! 2.04.4 under Windows 2000
Hi Thorvald,
TN What about Unicode-support?
Yes, we'll be adding it too... :-)
--
Regards,
Stefan
...A great teacher never strives to explain his vision.
He simply invites you to stand beside him and see for yourself.
- Reverend R. Inman
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi Jonathan,
on Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:57:39 -0600GMT, you wrote:
JA On Friday, February 20, 2004, Leif Gregory wrote...
FG Current beta is 2.04.04 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
JA [..]
Please trim replies to context.
JA [..]
JA Wrong button? This looks like a new message to me ;)
Not here.
Hello Graham,
FG a) Tying dynamic lookup of addresses when creating them to an LDAP
FG server rather than the personal address book. This would require you
FG to set a search order for addresses. In my case it would be a
FG corporate directory first.
We'll keep this in mind. It's not a
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:45:53 -0600, Douglas Hinds wrote:
AVG6 running the avbat9 plugin on TB!1.62r picked up the Trojan
horse downloader zom.get sent by z0mbie as ZGET.exe
Since AVG couldn't heal it, I had AVG move it to the virus vault
where I deleted ZGET with a right click.
Why let AVG
Hello Stefan,
Friday, February 20, 2004, 1:45:09 PM, you wrote:
ST We'll keep this in mind. It's not a trivial task, actually. If you
ST have a fast access to the server, it's OK. But everything gets
ST complicated for slow access servers...
I would agree for the public access LDAPs out there
Dear Krister,
ST The next version is scheduled for release in mid-April. And we have
ST a lot of things to do.
KE What i hope for is that the layout and interface doesn't
KE change so that we blind can't use it.
We will be doing every new control keeping this in mind.
KE As it is now, TB
30 matches
Mail list logo
