Re: F4 quoting in a reply
Hello Roelof, On Mon, 7 May 2007 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] RO Apparently you were interested in the version the behaviour changed, RO that was with version 3.98.09 Just been back and checked and that's certainly the case. RO If you create a bug report I'll confirm it, but the changed behaviour RO doesn't really bother me. It's just different than I expect (and was RO used too). Done and thanks if you support it too. -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.99.3 with POP3 account AntispamSniper 2.0.0.4 | Windows XP (build 2600) version 5.1 Service Pack 2 | F-Prot AV, Outpost Firewall Pro, Spysweeper, Adaware, SpyBot | CPU: Athlon 1.09 Ghz | RAM: 1024 MB Holiday in France: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/lazyhomes/holiday.html Current beta is 3.99.03 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: It's happening again!
Hallo Ian, On Mon, 7 May 2007 19:08:03 +1000GMT (7-5-2007, 11:08 +0200, where I live), you wrote: IAW however what this does clearly say is that someone on these IAW lists is harvesting e-mail addresses and usernames from the lists,or IAW there is some other person or organisation that is providing an IAW archive of the lists to spammers. Or somebody (one or multiple) has a virus/trojan/other malware that's doing that for him. Most address harvesting is done via bots and malware and unfortunately not everybody is as safety conscious as he should be. -- Groetjes, Roelof The Babylon Project was our last, best hope for peace. It failed. http://www.voormijalleen.nl/ The Bat! 3.99.3 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 2 pop3 accounts OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgpmuyUEXplYt.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 3.99.03 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: F4 quoting in a reply
Hallo Richard, On Mon, 7 May 2007 08:46:10 +0200GMT (7-5-2007, 8:46 +0200, where I live), you wrote: RO If you create a bug report I'll confirm it, but the changed behaviour RO doesn't really bother me. It's just different than I expect (and was RO used too). RW Done and thanks if you support it too. A hint, next time you create an entry in bugtrack and ask for support, add a URL like this: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6359 -- Groetjes, Roelof ERROR: 001 Windows loaded. System in danger. http://www.voormijalleen.nl/ The Bat! 3.99.3 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 2 pop3 accounts OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgpYpWN0J85hJ.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 3.99.03 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: It's happening again!
Hello Roelof, Monday, May 7, 2007, 11:38:07 AM, you wrote: RO Or somebody (one or multiple) has a virus/trojan/other malware that's RO doing that for him. RO Most address harvesting is done via bots and malware and RO unfortunately not everybody is as safety conscious as he should be. Couldn't have said it better. -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! Version 3.99.1 MyMacros 1.11a zOmbie's Macros Version 0.7 Windows 2000 Professional/5.0 build 2195 Service Pack 4 (0 days 3:25:12) on Uno AMD Duron Current beta is 3.99.03 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Protocol log bug
Anybody using Voyager: does the POP3 protocol logging works for you? -- Vili Current beta is 3.99.03 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Voyager 3.99.4 Slow Printing
I've noticed an appreciable slow down when trying to print out an email with this latest release. Time from invoking the print command till the print window appears is 20-25 seconds whereas in previous versions it was 5 or less. Anyone else notice this phenomenon? -- ò.ó Nick Danger [MUA: TB! Voyager 3.99.4] [OS: Windows XP 5 1] Current beta is 3.99.03 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Protocol log bug
Reply to message sent 05/07/2007, @ 10:39:43 (9:39 AM Locally) ~~~ Hello Vili, Anybody using Voyager: does the POP3 protocol logging works for you? I don't normally use it so I went and enabled it, did a manual mail check and looked at the log file. It seemed to be logging darn near everything that happened. If there was anything in particular you wanted checked out in the log let me know. -- ò.ó Nick Danger [MUA: TB! Voyager 3.99.4] [OS: Windows XP 5 1] Current beta is 3.99.03 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: unable to install the Home version
Unable to open install package. Verify if the package exists and you have right to access it, or contact the owner of the package to check if the package is a valid Windows Installer install package. Did the user try to install from the local drive or from the network/substed drive? Please install the MSIs from the location visible by both current user and the SYSTEM account. For example, in some cases if you install from the user's home directory, it may not work, because the Windows Installer context switches to SYSTEM account which may have no access rights to the user's home directory. The same is with network drives. A drive letter assigned by one account may not be valid under another account. Thank you Max! I will report the results!!! -- Vili Current beta is 3.99.03 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: F4 quoting in a reply
On Sunday, May 6, 2007, 23:52:13, Roelof Otten wrote: The reason that I didn't notice this behaviour was that I don't use F4 for answering without quotes. (Can't remember when I answered without quotes for the last time, if I ever did.) To tell the truth, I prefer the new behaviour - got spoiled by my news client that replies by quoting everything when nothing is selected, and with selected text only with the same keypress. -- Jernej Simončič http://deepthought.ena.si/ [The Bat! v3.99.3 on Windows 2003 5.2.3790.Service Pack 2] When you arrive at your chosen campsite, it is full. -- Barber's Ninth Law of Backpacking Current beta is 3.99.03 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: unable to install the Home version
On Saturday, May 5, 2007, 22:05:37, Vili wrote: Thanks... Dont tell me MSI is cutting edge :)) When was the last time Microsoft released a non-beta product? :) -- Jernej Simončič http://deepthought.ena.si/ [The Bat! v3.99.3 on Windows 2003 5.2.3790.Service Pack 2] Toothache tends to start on Saturday night. -- Laird's Law Current beta is 3.99.03 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: F4 quoting in a reply
Hello Roelof, On Mon, 7 May 2007 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] RO A hint, next time you create an entry in bugtrack and ask for support, RO add a URL like this: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6359 Thanks. Wasn't thinking! -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.99.3 with POP3 account AntispamSniper 2.0.0.4 | Windows XP (build 2600) version 5.1 Service Pack 2 | F-Prot AV, Outpost Firewall Pro, Spysweeper, Adaware, SpyBot | CPU: Athlon 1.09 Ghz | RAM: 1024 MB Holiday in France: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/lazyhomes/holiday.html Current beta is 3.99.03 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: F4 quoting in a reply
Hello Jernej, On Mon, 7 May 2007 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] JS got spoiled by my news client that replies by quoting everything JS when nothing is selected, and with selected text only with the same JS keypress. Then how do you reply to a particular person or folder for whom you have specific reply quick templates but don't want to quote any of the message at any particular time, because F4 is meant to do just that? Anyway, you could change the keystrokes in TB! to suit your method of working :-) -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.99.3 with POP3 account AntispamSniper 2.0.0.4 | Windows XP (build 2600) version 5.1 Service Pack 2 | F-Prot AV, Outpost Firewall Pro, Spysweeper, Adaware, SpyBot | CPU: Athlon 1.09 Ghz | RAM: 1024 MB Holiday in France: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/lazyhomes/holiday.html Current beta is 3.99.03 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Voyager 3.99.4 Slow Printing
I've noticed an appreciable slow down when trying to print out an email with this latest release. Time from invoking the print command till the print window appears is 20-25 seconds whereas in previous versions it was 5 or less. Anyone else notice this phenomenon? I dont observe this... 1-2 sec and printing starts. I am running Voyager from an USB2 external 2.5, 40 GB Hitachi HDD (my old laptop HDD). (What I observed is, that running Voyager from a USB stick is just not the way to go...) -- Vili Current beta is 3.99.03 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Protocol log bug
Anybody using Voyager: does the POP3 protocol logging works for you? I don't normally use it so I went and enabled it, did a manual mail check and looked at the log file. It seemed to be logging darn near everything that happened. If there was anything in particular you wanted checked out in the log let me know. Thanks Nick. What did you set as the protocol log file? At me, I set e.g. \infoms.log \infobat.log etc. That is a relative path and should work as the files are created... Would you setup like protocol log for e.g. 6 of your accounts (if that many exists :) and report back? At me, it is broken. -- Vili Current beta is 3.99.03 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: Protocol log bug
I wrote: Anybody using Voyager: does the POP3 protocol logging works for you? I don't normally use it so I went and enabled it, did a manual mail check and looked at the log file. It seemed to be logging darn near everything that happened. If there was anything in particular you wanted checked out in the log let me know. Thanks Nick. What did you set as the protocol log file? At me, I set e.g. \infoms.log \infobat.log etc. That is a relative path and should work as the files are created... Would you setup like protocol log for e.g. 6 of your accounts (if that many exists :) and report back? At me, it is broken. And now it works... I cannot figure this out. But certainly something is broken here... -- Vili Current beta is 3.99.03 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Voyager 3.99.4 Slow Printing
5/7/2007 2:35 PM Hi Vili, On 5/7/2007 Vili wrote: V (What I observed is, that running Voyager from a USB stick is just not V the way to go...) Unless you use Win2K. 8-]} -- Take Care, Paul Voyager v.3.95.06 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195 No IMAP OTFE Current beta is 3.99.03 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: Voyager 3.99.4 Slow Printing
V (What I observed is, that running Voyager from a USB stick is just not V the way to go...) Unless you use Win2K. 8-]} I dont know... I dont _totally_ agree... Even in WinXP, you can optimize a stick for performance, but if writing is delayed and for some reason you have got a power failure... Or I just dont trust MS to let them manage delayed writing :)) (If I would not have a 2.5 USB HDD drive, of course I would still use the stick.) -- Vili Current beta is 3.99.03 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: unable to install the Home version
Unable to open install package. Verify if the package exists and you have right to access it, or contact the owner of the package to check if the package is a valid Windows Installer install package. Did the user try to install from the local drive or from the network/substed drive? Please install the MSIs from the location visible by both current user and the SYSTEM account. For example, in some cases if you install from the user's home directory, it may not work, because the Windows Installer context switches to SYSTEM account which may have no access rights to the user's home directory. The same is with network drives. A drive letter assigned by one account may not be valid under another account. He started to install from the C: root, works like charm. He send you his thanks!! :) -- Vili Current beta is 3.99.03 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
lost attachments after restore to 3.99.3
I restored a backup file (from XP) into 3.99.3 running under Vista. Everything is working fine so far, except for all attachments in one account. The icon appears at the bottom of the message, but if I double click TB! crashes. Save As tells me the attachment is not there. I can see a heap of attachments in c:\users\davidp\AppData\Roaming\TheBat!\account name\Attach but TB! seems to have lost the link to them all. Other accounts are ok. If I go to Account - Properties - Files Directories - Attachments - Directory, it says default and when I hit browse I see the correct `Attach' directory. Is there anyway to fix this ? It is like TB! doesn't have open permission or something. Run as Administrator doesn't help, TB! still crashes and explorer can open files there no problem. thanks, davidp. -- Best regards, davidp mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.99.3 on Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6000 Current beta is 3.99.03 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
