Re: Questions about Message Tags management
Hello Mark, Could/would you send me a copy via PM? M You have mail :-) Thanks! It worked. OK, OK, I'll accept a Belgian beer ;-) Strangely enough there seems to be a maximum of 4 Tags in the Right Click Menu??? I don't know, I haven't done any further testing/investigation with tags. I'm not actually using them. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v5.1.6.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 3 My photos at: http://www.Rancho-K.com My photoblog: http://mau.aminus3.com Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:29 PM, MAU miguel.ur...@gmail.com wrote: Forget it. Do you understand what 'pointless' means? Apparently for you it means to stop a discussion with for me it works. I don't care if it doesn't work for you, or if the solution that would work for you wouldn't change anything for me, because I don't have a problem. Great. Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there
Hello Carsten, Forget it. Do you understand what 'pointless' means? Apparently for you it means to stop a discussion with for me it works. No, the discussion is pointless not 'because it works for me' but because you don't understand what I am trying to say (or I can't explain it more clearly), and because, no matter how much we discuss, you are going to keep thinking there is a bug m(*) and I am convinced there is not and it is WAD. So, why continue the discussion? (*) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_bug -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v5.1.6.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 3 My photos at: http://www.Rancho-K.com My photoblog: http://mau.aminus3.com Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there
Hello Mark, Maybe we are not talking about the same thing, but I have a Virtual Folder for today's messages [I know, this might sound strange to some :-)] and when I delete messages in there, they are still shown, except, from then on, Trash is being mentioned as the folder they are in. That's probably because your VF is also 'looking' at Trash folder. Go to your VF Properties and remove Trash and deleted messages should/will not show then -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v5.1.6.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 3 My photos at: http://www.Rancho-K.com My photoblog: http://mau.aminus3.com Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there
Hello Rick, Sorry to interject, but it seems to be working as DESIGNED. If you don't want read messages to show, then they DON'T. There WERE some refresh issues with VFs which I believe were fixed. That's probably the reason some think there is a bug now. I mean, VFs are dumb and they do what they are told to do. For example, if you were a VF and I told you: When I tell you to refresh, look in this list of folders for messages that are Unread and display them here. What would you do? ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v5.1.6.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 3 My photos at: http://www.Rancho-K.com My photoblog: http://mau.aminus3.com Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there
Hello Raymund, The VF for the mailticker is the best example. No one would expect that a mail that you have open in an message window is closed because of some background activity. That may be a different issue because Mailticker is not really a VF although it may seem so. Mailticker existed long before VFs were 'invented' and implemented. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v5.1.6.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 3 My photos at: http://www.Rancho-K.com My photoblog: http://mau.aminus3.com Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: 5.1.6.2 VF problem still there
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:21 AM, MAU miguel.ur...@gmail.com wrote: No, the discussion is pointless not 'because it works for me' but because you don't understand what I am trying to say (or I can't explain it more clearly), and because, no matter how much we discuss, you are going to keep thinking there is a bug m(*) and I am convinced there is not and it is WAD. So, why continue the discussion? Because what you say is just a question of definition. Even if this does not qualify as a bug, it may still be a FAIL. We don't even know if this behaviour was intendet (which I cannot imagine, since it is of disadvantage to the user). If it was not intended then this should be fixed. If it was intended and does not make sense, then it should be fixed as well. I changed the subject. Pleased? ;-) Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
