Re: Weird Menu Navigator behaviour

2003-12-10 Thread Martin Schoch
> Not exactly same result. Over here: Menu Navigator is lost... Other "play": Options - Preferences - OK ->>> Menu Navigation Button lost - then Options - Preferences - OK ->>> Menu Navigation Button appears - then Options - Preferences - OK ->>> Menu Navigation Button lost ... -- Best regar

Re: Weird Menu Navigator behaviour

2003-12-10 Thread George Mitchell
MaXxX wrote: > Check whether you see the Menu Navigator button. > Now, enter Options-Preferences, and OK out. > The Menu Navigator will be gone. > Now, enter Options-Preferences, and OK out again. > The Menu Navigator will be back. > Repeat for your own amusement. Yeah, I reported that here in 2.

Lot of problems with "View Mode"

2003-12-10 Thread Martin Schoch
Hi Got a very nice picture after changing View Mode in the message list pane... -- Best regards, Martin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TheBat! 2.02.3 CE on Windows 2000 5 2195 Service Pack 4<> Current beta is 2.02 CE RC2 | "Using

Re: 2.02.3 is released

2003-12-10 Thread MAU
Hello Jonathan, > They changed the header bits in the compose window back to grey > again... just after I started to get used to it. ;) Don't worry, they may change it again to white and thus have an excuse for a new release. ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The

Re: 2.02.3 is released

2003-12-10 Thread Kjartan Mannes
Wednesday, December 10, 2003, 1:25:49 PM, MaXxX wrote: >> To close, the release version numbers conform to programming version >> numbering standard. > And, if we were to use the Linux software version numbering scheme as > well, we'd go: Major 2, Minor 02, Build 3 - with Build even for > suspecte

Re: Weird Menu Navigator behaviour

2003-12-10 Thread Martin Schoch
Hi MaXxX On Wednesday, December 10, 2003 1:39:08 PM you wrote: > The Menu Navigator will be back. > Repeat for your own amusement. Not exactly same result. Over here: Menu Navigator is lost... -- Best regards, Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] TheBat! 2.02.3 CE on Windows 2000 5 2195 Service

Re: 2.02.03 CE: Folder/Maintenance

2003-12-10 Thread DG Raftery Sr.®©
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wednesday, December 10, 2003/10:47:58 AM RE: "2.02.03 CE: Folder/Maintenance" Greetings George, On Wednesday, December 10, 2003, 10:09:48 AM, you wrote: GMM> After a while I found that all old/exceed messages are moved to trash GMM> instead of b

Re[2]: 2.02.3 is released

2003-12-10 Thread DG Raftery Sr.ŽŠ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wednesday, December 10, 2003/10:43:35 AM RE: "2.02.3 is released" Greetings MaXxX, On Wednesday, December 10, 2003, 7:25:49 AM, you wrote: >> To close, the release version numbers conform to programming version >> numbering standard. M> And, if we

Re[2]: 2.02.3 is released

2003-12-10 Thread DG Raftery Sr.®©
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wednesday, December 10, 2003/10:39:58 AM RE: "2.02.3 is released" Greetings MAU, On Wednesday, December 10, 2003, 9:41:10 AM, you wrote: >> Having said that Ritlab could end with 2.02.99 before... M> Christmas? ;-) Let's see. Today's the 10th and

Re: IMAP Folder Hierarchy: Where Is It?

2003-12-10 Thread Gary
Hello Jonathan, Wednesday, December 10, 2003, 9:13:58 AM, you wrote: >> Mulberry does not have this bug. TB does You can have a standard >> display, or have "containers" for just your Favorite mailboxes/dirs, or >> just subscribed dirs, or any other name you want for a container... J> Ahhh virt

Re: 2.02.3 is released

2003-12-10 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Wednesday, December 10, 2003, MAU wrote... >> As somebody already asked, what's the difference between 2.02.3 CE >> and 2.02 CE? > .3? They changed the header bits in the compose window back to grey again... just after I started to get used to it. ;) -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: IMAP Folder Hierarchy: Where Is It?

2003-12-10 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Wednesday, December 10, 2003, Gary wrote... >> That is a weird bug in Mulberry... you might want to drop them a >> note on that one. I've not used Mulberry myself, I have Evolution, >> pine, pegasus, TheBat, and SquirrelMail... so I normally have a >> pretty good selection for testing. > Mulbe

2.02.03 CE: Folder/Maintenance

2003-12-10 Thread George M. Menegakis
Hello ppl, Has something been changed or this is my idea? Today, after a week or two, I chose Folder/Maintenance and then checked all four options. After a while I found that all old/exceed messages are moved to trash instead of been purged. I am sure that in all previous bat versions the

Re: 2.02.3 is released

2003-12-10 Thread MaXxX
On Wednesday, December 10, 2003, at 3:03:11 PM, Giampaolo Bellavite spewed forth what is to be beheld below: > Il 10/12/2003 alle 2.20, Stefan Tanurkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: >> - more plug-in interfaces >> - ... OK, this is it for now, otherwise we'll have to move the >> deadline

View Mode, Expand Threads, and odd message display (v2.02.03)

2003-12-10 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hey Guys I am using the view mode option to expand all threads (set on all folders), when I got the following display... http://thebat.netdork.net/view_mode_thread.jpg The threads are totally messed up, notice how the "Installation with Mysql" part is split up, with part of the threa

Re: 2.02.3 is released

2003-12-10 Thread Miroslav Florensen
Hi Giampaolo, > So the message header fields are back to a gray background... :/ yes! *pleasure*, and i hope that's final. The white background are not acceptable for me. Greetings Miros -- BAT-MAIL.DE.VU - http://bat-mail.de.vu Minimal Design GLYPH - Original GLYPHs - Tools - Splash-Scree