note: strange behaviour when fetching mail after system restore from image (old registry)

Hello bats, on Thu, 19. Feb 2004 at 02:36:14 +0100 I wrote: d> I just went to a backup (image) of my system partition that was two d> days old and recognized strange behaviour while fetching mail: Of course, this is probably because of the "last message marker" stored somewhere in the Registry,

strange behaviour when fetching mail after system restore from image (old registry)

Hello bats, I just went to a backup (image) of my system partition that was two days old and recognized strange behaviour while fetching mail: [02:22:48] C: Connected to 127.0.0.1, port 110 [02:22:48] S: +OK POP3 POPFile (v0.20.1) server ready [02:22:48] C: USER xxx [02:22:49] S: +OK May I ha

Re: 2.04.3 test release

Hello all, Wednesday, February 18, 2004, Stefan Tanurkov wrote: > [+] More sensible settings for choosing Working Directory what this means please? > [+] THEBAT.INI file in the program directory can be used for automatic > installation on networks Stef, full description of included parametr

Re[2]: 2.04.3 test release

Hi Miroslav, MF> if the mail folder '%APPDATA%\BatMail' is selected, the files are still MF> present after the deletion of TB. Good spot. :-) Fixed - it's the uninstallation program's fault. Thank you! -- Cheers, Stefan ..."Some people strengthen the society just by being the kind of peop

Re[2]: 2.04.3 test release

Hi Jonathan, JA> Aren't these two considered "new features"? Surely new features should JA> be fully tested before being put into a final release... or did I miss JA> something? Did you see the final release? ;-) Me neither - it's still in works. Because the release date is close, I've been testi

Re: 2.04.3 test release

On Thursday, February 19, 2004, at 2:09:41 AM, Stefan Tanurkov spewed forth what is to be beheld below: M>> * The selection still causes bugs when expanding threads and scrolling M>> the window at the same time > Well, I've added additional repaint, but I'm not 100% sure it will > help. However,

Re[2]: 2.04.3 test release

Dear MaXxX, M> * The column right-click menu still has no info as to what the M> "generic" and "none" things are Well, the menu is all about View Modes... On the other hand, what would be a replacement for (none)? I've made it "No View Mode", but it's not precisely what it really means. No View M

Re: 2.04.3 test release

On Thursday, February 19, 2004, at 1:19:45 AM, fear chilled people's souls as Jonathan Angliss whispered in a sinister voice: >> [+] More sensible settings for choosing Working Directory >> [+] THEBAT.INI file in the program directory can be used for automatic >> installation on networks > Ar

Re: 2.04.3 test release

On Wednesday, February 18, 2004, at 10:44:35 PM, a fearless knight known as Stefan Tanurkov entered the dragon's lair and exclaimed: > I hope it's the last one :-) The sorting works fine, good job (though a small tweak it was :)). The dropdown completion lists are well-aligned now. But: * The

Re: no message loaded - part 2

On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 01:49:44 +0200, Luga wrote: >At opening these letters gives out the message - "no message loaded" >When The bat! will start to understand the given format? It will never. Your letters have a malformed Content-type header- field. In other words: your own .msg files are to blam

Re: Test release.

Hi Stefan, Tuesday, February 17, 2004, 5:14:10 PM, you wrote: ST> Dear Peter, PG>> OK, I realize that the IMAP issues with the attachments are not going PG>> to be fixed, ST> Hmm. Which ones you mean exactly? I was too fast deciding that Synchronize All Messages will solve all the problems. The

Re: Connection Center Graphics

Hello bats, on Wed, 18. Feb 2004 at 11:15:53 -0500 Kevin Coates wrote: K> The progress indicator shows up as a solid black circle when K> downloading mail. I presume its supposed to be graphical display. K> I have "Options|Graphical High Color Images" toggled on and using an K> ATI AIW 9800 Pro

Re: error with checking PGP signature with GnuPG

Hello bats, on Wed, 18. Feb 2004 at 18:06:52 +0200 Stefan Tanurkov wrote: >>> Filed this: >>> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0002442 MS>> Could you solve this problem? S> No, because it seems to depend on your GPG settings. TB! merely calls S> GPG to perform operatio

Connection Center Graphics

Hello TBBeta! The progress indicator shows up as a solid black circle when downloading mail. I presume its supposed to be graphical display. I have "Options|Graphical High Color Images" toggled on and using an ATI AIW 9800 Pro with 1200x1600 display. -- Kevin Coates Dewitt, NY USA Using TB! v2

Re: error with checking PGP signature with GnuPG

Hi Stefan On Wednesday, February 18, 2004 5:06:52 PM you wrote: > No, because it seems to depend on your GPG settings. TB! merely calls > GPG to perform operations in hope GPG is configured correctly. Could you please send me the exact string with all parameters which is calling gpg? -- Bes

Re: Message list font - different size

Hello bats, on Wed, 18. Feb 2004 at 17:09:26 +0100 MaXxX wrote: >> you encoded your To: line in base64. M> I wonder why. I have no high-ASCII characters in my address... You answered to "Marcus Ohlström" and put his name into your To: header line. -- shinE! http://www.thequod.de ICQ#152282665

Re: error with checking PGP signature with GnuPG

Hello bats, on Wed, 18. Feb 2004 at 16:57:48 +0100 Martin Schoch wrote: >> Filed this: >> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0002442 M> Bugnote added today. Thanks. Adding no-default-keyring to gnupg.conf helps, but I wonder what functional sideeffect this has?! -- s

Re: bug: incorrect password char for OpenPGP password fields

Hello bats, on Tue, 17. Feb 2004 at 21:03:04 +0100 I wrote: d> the display of '|' instead of standard dots has been fixed for account d> passwords, but still remains for the (de|en)crypting passphrase input d> boxes. Fixed for 2.04.2.. :) -- shinE! http://www.thequod.de ICQ#152282665 GnuPG/PG

Re: Message list font - different size

On Wednesday, February 18, 2004, at 4:52:04 PM, DAniel hAhler picked up a feather, dipped its tip in ink, and began scribbling: > you encoded your To: line in base64. I wonder why. I have no high-ASCII characters in my address... -- |\ /| \~~~/ \~~~/ | \/ | /\ > < \~/ >

Re[2]: error with checking PGP signature with GnuPG

Hello Martin, >> Filed this: >> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0002442 MS> Could you solve this problem? No, because it seems to depend on your GPG settings. TB! merely calls GPG to perform operations in hope GPG is configured correctly. -- Cheers, Stefan I did

Re: Message list font - different size

Hello bats, on Wed, 18. Feb 2004 at 15:58:14 +0100 MaXxX wrote: CP>>> What could cause this to happen? >> 8 bit characters in message headers. It always has and always will. >> If the default message list display font doesn't support the >> character set required, a near equivalent is used instea

Re: error with checking PGP signature with GnuPG

Hi dAniel On Monday, February 2, 2004 12:12:53 AM you wrote: > Filed this: > https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0002442 Bugnote added today. -- Best regards, Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] TheBat! 2.04.2 on Windows 2000 5.0 2195 Service Pack 4

Re: error with checking PGP signature with GnuPG

Hi dAniel On Monday, February 2, 2004 12:12:53 AM you wrote: >>> gpg: Signature made 01/31/04 19:22:26 using RSA key ID 6F7254D5 >>> gpg: renaming `D:/GnuPG\pubring.gpg' to >>> `D:/GnuPG\pubring.bak' failed: MS>> Confirmed. MS>> When using a GPG key manager there is no problem. > Filed this:

Re: 2.04.2 test release

Hello Stefan Tanurkov, > Please say it's OK to be released :-) HTML Mails are still not correctly redirected. http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0002558 -- best regards Miroslav Current beta is 2.04.2 | 'U

SmartBat

Does the quick search in SmartBat do any thing? I suspected it was for searching through the text, but it appears, at this point, to do nothing. Also, are there plans to offer some configurable settings for it? I find that I have different editor needs for mail composing and text handling

Re[2]: SmartBat woes

Dear Stuart, SH> I worked on a support desk for years and never got the chance to use SH> that line. Well, when I was working on support, I never used that line either. :-) Sure enough, it was a joke. However, I cannot confirm - the record is displayed in the list. -- Cheers, Stefan If you

Re: SmartBat woes

On Wednesday, February 18, 2004, at 3:56:46 PM, Stefan Tanurkov picked up a feather, dipped its tip in ink, and began scribbling: M>> - annoying and confusing ":-)" in the title, seems to suggest that M>> this whole window is a joke > It IS a joke - we've put it there because it sounds like

Re: SmartBat woes

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 M>> - Creating an event at date 31-12-2100 causes its time to be not M>> displayed at all in the event list ST> Don't do that then. ;-) I worked on a support desk for years and never got the chance to use that line. - -- Stuart Using The Bat!