Re[2]: The Bat 4.0

Hello, Thursday, September 2, 2004, 12:53:21 PM, Mary Bull wrote: MB I trust that support will be there for me, if I need it Ritlabs support? I emailed them several times and got no respond. I can't even be sure it exists. :D -- Best regards, Borismailto:[EMAIL

Moving off

As a courtesy to all of you who have helped me over the years, a short note of thanks to say that I'm taking a break from TB! for a variety of reasons. The recent beta/new version/licensing bruhaha sort of turned me off, but more important to me, I wrote two polite requests for information from

Re: Message forwarding only marks 1 message

Hallo Graham, On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 15:53:53 +0100GMT (3-9-2004, 16:53 +0200, where I live), you wrote: FG If you select several messages to be forwarded onto a new recipient, FG then only 1 (the first one selected I think) gets marked as being FG forwarded. Not confirmed. When doing a

Re: The Bat 4.0

Hello Boris! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 9:59 AM, you wrote: MB I trust that support will be there for me, if I need it BG Ritlabs support? I emailed them several times and got no respond. BG I can't even be sure it exists. :D I am sorry that you have had that bad experience. When I first

Re: Mod: Bad language

Hello Dierk, On Thursday, September 2, 2004 at 10:27:53 PM you [DH] wrote (at least in part): No, it's because we *are* evil. We always were and always will be. DH 100% ACK. 0% ACK. Underhanded, insidious, malicious, demonic. These attributes I could live with, but plainly evil? What's about

Re: 3.0 Wierdness

On Thursday, September 2, 2004, 9:24 PM, you wrote: SG FWIW, In addtion to Avast! and XP as specified in my sig, I'm using K9 SG 1.29 for SPAM checking, and I have only Avast!'s Plugin Virus Checker SG enabled, not the Mail Service. thanks for the update, I'm using K9 1.27, time to upgrade! see

Re: Bat 3.0 Sync with IPAQ Pocket PC

Hello Tim, Friday, September 3, 2004, 2:40:50 PM, you wrote: TC Anyone have any luck sync-ing their Pocket PC with the Bat? Any TC Tips? I sync Time Chaos. But I never tried to sync The Bat! In what way would you like to sync TB!? -- Best Wishes, Mark

RE:The Bat 4.0

Hello Boris, Friday, September 3, 2004, 4:59:50 PM, you wrote: Hello, Thursday, September 2, 2004, 12:53:21 PM, Mary Bull wrote: MB I trust that support will be there for me, if I need it Ritlabs support? I emailed them several times and got no respond. I can't even be sure it exists.

Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

Hello MAU, Later tonight I will report in TBBeta some of the bugs I've found. Almost one day later but here is part of what I found. I accidentally deleted some screen shots I had but I think I can explain what happens without them. Take this set of an Incoming filter and sub-filters (in

Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

Hello MAU, M 1.- All sub-filters behave as if they had Continue processing with M other filters selected, but none of them has it. And... You are late for one day :) It was fixed yesterday -- 9Val

Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

Hello MAU, I could elaborate a bit more, but I think it is enough for the moment. ... to explain, at least in part, my reaction yesterday. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v4.123 Beta/Umpteen

Re: The Bat 4.0

Hallo Boris, On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 09:59:50 -0500GMT (3-9-2004, 16:59 +0200, where I live), you wrote: MB I trust that support will be there for me, if I need it BG Ritlabs support? I emailed them several times and got no respond. I can't BG even be sure it exists. :D I've mailed them once and

Order of filter actionsd

Hello, I have a filer set as follows. Move to folder Dave Park the message Flag the message When set like the above it does what it's supposed to do, but leaves a Parked Flagged message in the Inbox also. Reset the filter to: Move to folder Dave Flag the message Park the message And it works

Re: Order of filter actionsd

Hello Paul, PFS If the order of the actions is so important then why is the selection PFS for Park listed before selection for Flagged? Or have I missed PFS something? Already fixed -- 9Val

Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

Hello 9Val, M 1.- All sub-filters behave as if they had Continue processing with M other filters selected, but none of them has it. And... You are late for one day :) It was fixed yesterday Glad to hear that 9Val. But that doesn't change the fact that the release version available for

Re: Bat 3.0 Sync with IPAQ Pocket PC

Hello Mark, On Friday, September 03, 2004 at 11:43:18 AM you wrote: In what way would you like to sync TB!? Just Folders and messages. -- Tim Casten,ZDC National Air Traffic Controllers Association Current beta is (none) | 'Using

Re: Order of filter actionsd

Hello Paul, When set like the above it does what it's supposed to do, but leaves a Parked Flagged message in the Inbox also. Is the moved message also parked in the folder it was moved to?. If NFS works as I think it should, it should not be parked. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El