Re[2]: News: Thunderbird IMAP

2009-03-01 Thread Kertész Vilmos
Hello Jens, >> They know they are not going to win the whole world with The Bat! > Thats not based on true! The Bat! has been the first Application > which got a big respect of every people - users and admins. I was > brought to the Bat 1.62 or something by a collegue/friend of me in > th

Re: Reply to HTML Mail is HTML not Text

2009-03-01 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Jens, On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 00:37:19 +0100GMT (2-3-2009, 0:37 +0100, where I live), you wrote: JF> But until i sent it, the Editor showed up as "HTML only" - try it out! I tried. When replying the reply shows up as HTML, but immediately changes into plain text. -- Groetjes, Roelof I t

Re: Could someone send me two Messges?

2009-03-01 Thread Jens Franik
Montag, 2. März 2009 at 00:33, Jens Franik wrote: > Anlagen: >1) screen28.png (3268 Byte, IrfanView PNG File) The attached Picture PNG with Transparent Background is not shown in the Picture Tab of The Bat! - it is only a black caret showing: Anlagen: 1) screen29.png As of this Picture

Re: Reply to HTML Mail is HTML not Text

2009-03-01 Thread Jens Franik
Montag, 2. März 2009 at 00:04, Jens Franik wrote: > Hello The Bat! Beta Tester, > if set %EDITOR=1 in the Reply Template and answering to HTML Message, > the Message ist in HTML and not Plain-Text. > Can this be confirmed? I have to correct myself, after sending the Reply directly to myself it

Re: Reply to HTML Mail is HTML not Text

2009-03-01 Thread Jens Franik
Montag, 2. März 2009 at 00:30, Roelof Otten wrote: JF>> if set %EDITOR=1 in the Reply Template and answering to HTML Message, JF>> the Message ist in HTML and not Plain-Text. > I suggest that you use %SetEditor="1" Sorry, of course this is in Quotes, i just wrote it quick and dirty: ,- [ a

Re: Could someone send me two Messges?

2009-03-01 Thread Jens Franik
Sonntag, 1. März 2009 at 23:37, NetVicious wrote: > this function was broken By the way, have a look at this Picture, i poorly refreshed the 16 Messages of "The Bat Beta" right this Moment - do you see any refresh here? All Virtual Subfolders are belonging to messages in Parent "The_Bat". Anla

Re: Reply to HTML Mail is HTML not Text

2009-03-01 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Jens, On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 00:04:36 +0100GMT (2-3-2009, 0:04 +0100, where I live), you wrote: JF> if set %EDITOR=1 in the Reply Template and answering to HTML Message, JF> the Message ist in HTML and not Plain-Text. I suggest that you use %SetEditor="1" -- Groetjes, Roelof "Being right to

Re: Could someone send me two Messges?

2009-03-01 Thread Jens Franik
Sonntag, 1. März 2009 at 23:37, NetVicious wrote: >> This works, thank you, but normally it should be done automatic? > Do you have checked the autorefresh option on the Virtual Folder? > PD: I read in the list this function was broken on the last betas. Yes it is, and it is more worst if you

Re: 4.1.11.6: VFs not refresshing automatically

2009-03-01 Thread Jens Franik
Sonntag, 1. März 2009 at 15:01, MAU wrote: > I have just received Vili's reply to my > . > It was properly filtered and assigned Colour Group 'R-To_me'. However, > it was not shown in my [To me] Virtual Folder. A manual Refresh was > needed. > Has anyone else seen any problem with 'Auto refres

Re: Could someone send me two Messges?

2009-03-01 Thread NetVicious
jueves, 26 feb 2009 at 23:22, it seems you wrote: > This works, thank you, but normally it should be done automatic? Do you have checked the autorefresh option on the Virtual Folder? PD: I read in the list this function was broken on the last betas. -- /\/ Using The B

Re: News: Thunderbird IMAP

2009-03-01 Thread Jens Franik
Sonntag, 1. März 2009 at 10:51, Robert Tomanek wrote: > They know they are not going to win the whole world with The Bat! Thats not based on true! The Bat! has been the first Application which got a big respect of every people - users and admins. I was brought to the Bat 1.62 or something by a

Re: News: Thunderbird IMAP

2009-03-01 Thread Jens Franik
Sonntag, 1. März 2009 at 08:33, Vili wrote: >> Samstag, 28. Februar 2009 at 18:10, Kertész Vilmos wrote: >> >> Ok, i wanted to point out, that the other Applications are developed > ... > No, I did not write that Of course not, as you see in mid:10426908.20090228191...@gmx.de -- With kind Reg

Re: News: Thunderbird IMAP

2009-03-01 Thread Jens Franik
Sonntag, 1. März 2009 at 08:21, Vili wrote: > My problem was that you mentioned "improvement" and then you say that > "I can not see if it is getting better or different." So, + in your > first sentence and - in your second one. It was confusing. I am not an > English major myself :), so it is n

Re: News: Thunderbird IMAP

2009-03-01 Thread Jens Franik
Sonntag, 1. März 2009 at 00:05, Christian Grams wrote: > ...and proud of it! So und wenn du stolz bist, sorry... Ok, if you are proud now, would you please stop imediately to post HTML Messages to the List without testing purposes. MOD: Please have a Look at this. -- With kind Regards Jens F

Re: News: Thunderbird IMAP

2009-03-01 Thread NetVicious
domingo, 1 mar 2009 at 10:51, it seems you wrote: > I am pretty sure Ritlabs are feeling the same way today. They know > they are not going to win the whole world with The Bat!, they already > only cater to a small group of enthusiasts that keep buying new > versions. It gives them enough money to

Reply to HTML Mail is HTML not Text

2009-03-01 Thread Jens Franik
Hello The Bat! Beta Tester, if set %EDITOR=1 in the Reply Template and answering to HTML Message, the Message ist in HTML and not Plain-Text. Can this be confirmed? -- With kind Regards Jens Franik mailto:je...@gmx.de Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg The Bat! 4.1.11.6 mit

Re: The Bat! IMAP (was: News: Thunderbird IMAP)

2009-03-01 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Robert, On Sun, 1 Mar 2009 08:14:36 +0100 GMT (01/Mar/09, 14:14 +0700 GMT), Robert Tomanek wrote: >> Kindly see the attached famous interview from the year 2000, promising >> improved IMAP(4) support from v2. It does not say what exactly they >> were going to improve though. Somebody might

Re: 4.1.11.6: VFs not refresshing automatically

2009-03-01 Thread MAU
Hello MAU, > I have just received Vili's reply to my > . > > It was properly filtered and assigned Colour Group 'R-To_me'. However, > it was not shown in my [To me] Virtual Folder. A manual Refresh was > needed. And when I marked Vili's message as read in my TBBeta folder, it still displayed as

4.1.11.6: VFs not refresshing automatically

2009-03-01 Thread MAU
Hello all, I have just received Vili's reply to my . It was properly filtered and assigned Colour Group 'R-To_me'. However, it was not shown in my [To me] Virtual Folder. A manual Refresh was needed. Has anyone else seen any problem with 'Auto refresh' of VFs in this last version (4.1.11.6)?

Re: Connection Manager hangup while low bandwith

2009-03-01 Thread Franz Schöler
> Hello The Bat! Beta Tester, while having low bandwith with a lot of downloads, the Connection Manager of The Bat! hangup and does not finish his Job. This happened very often in the last past 2 weeks. Anlagen: 1) screen25.png (11178 Byte, IrfanView PNG File) > Hello, even with good bandwidt

Re: News: Thunderbird IMAP

2009-03-01 Thread Vili
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 7:24 AM, MAU wrote: > Hello Robert, >> Thanks. However, next time include the full quote: > Pardon me? It is the full quote, signature included, of the message I > identified with MID. See it attached if you don't trust me. > Plus a second one I just found. Thanks MAU, I re

Re: News: Thunderbird IMAP

2009-03-01 Thread MAU
Hello Robert, > Thanks. However, next time include the full quote: Pardon me? It is the full quote, signature included, of the message I identified with MID. See it attached if you don't trust me. Plus a second one I just found. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The

Re: News: Thunderbird IMAP

2009-03-01 Thread Robert Tomanek
Hello MAU, Sunday, March 1, 2009, 12:36:25 PM, you wrote: >>> I would side with Stefan on this, rewrite from scratch, if possible, >>> and if Ritlabs has the resources. [...] >> >> The problem is that Stefan/ Ritlabs nowhere did say that they are >> going to rewrite it from scratch > ,- [ 15-

Re: News: Thunderbird IMAP

2009-03-01 Thread MAU
Hello Robert, >> I would side with Stefan on this, rewrite from scratch, if possible, >> and if Ritlabs has the resources. [...] > > The problem is that Stefan/ Ritlabs nowhere did say that they are > going to rewrite it from scratch ,- [ 15-Dec-2008 ] | Hello Vilius, | | Monday, December 1

[noise] Re: News: Thunderbird IMAP

2009-03-01 Thread Francis Dhumes
Hello Christian, > ...and proud of it! Of course, it's a basic "pigquoters" behaviour. I forgot: - HTML posting on this list -- Regards, Francismailto:fran...@dhumes.fr French translator of TB! and ASS Message handmade on TB! v.4.1.11.6 on Windows Vista 6001 Ser

Re: News: Thunderbird IMAP

2009-03-01 Thread Robert Tomanek
Hello Vili, Sunday, March 1, 2009, 9:10:32 AM, you wrote: > I would side with Stefan on this, rewrite from scratch, if possible, > and if Ritlabs has the resources. [...] The problem is that Stefan/ Ritlabs nowhere did say that they are going to rewrite it from scratch. The quote that Marek and o

Re: News: Thunderbird IMAP

2009-03-01 Thread Vili
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 2:09 AM, Robert Tomanek wrote: ... > The problem is it doesn't say WHAT exactly is going to be fixed (like > whether it's only going to be minor bugs with message counters, or > more major ones with message list not refreshing, or compatibility > improvements with specific s