> Hello All,
>>> BTW I do not know, what You think about HTML support, what are You missing
>>> in version 4?
RvdH>> An easy way to show all images in the current email (something like
Outlook
RvdH>> has, and NO i do not want to switch to Outlook...).
RvdH>> Now I have to use the URL manager and
>> BTW I do not know, what You think about HTML support, what are You missing
>> in version 4?
> A normal HTML viewer. I dont want to send examples. Ritlabs should
> install an Outlook and go over like a 1000 HTML mails. When TB matches
> up to Outlook for all of them, then the job done. Not until
Hello All,
>> BTW I do not know, what You think about HTML support, what are You missing
>> in version 4?
RvdH> An easy way to show all images in the current email (something like
Outlook
RvdH> has, and NO i do not want to switch to Outlook...).
RvdH> Now I have to use the URL manager and try to
Hello Vili,
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 10:47:46 +0100 GMT (11/Jun/10, 16:47 PM +0700 GMT),
Vili wrote:
>> BTW I do not know, what You think about HTML support, what are You missing
>> in version 4?
V> A normal HTML viewer. I dont want to send examples. Ritlabs should
V> install an O[xxx]k and go over l
Hello Robert,
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 15:45:10 +0200 GMT (11/Jun/10, 20:45 PM +0700 GMT),
Robert van der Hulst wrote:
>> BTW I do not know, what You think about HTML support, what are You missing
>> in version 4?
RvdH> An easy way to show all images in the current email (something like
Outlook
RvdH
Hi Marek,
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010, at 08:58:03 [GMT +0200] (which was 8:58 where I live)
you wrote about: 'Did I miss the funeral?'
> we do not know what other enhancements will be surely available in next
> release, this is question to Ritlabs.
> BTW I do not know, what You think about HTML suppor
> BTW I do not know, what You think about HTML support, what are You missing
> in version 4?
A normal HTML viewer. I dont want to send examples. Ritlabs should
install an Outlook and go over like a 1000 HTML mails. When TB matches
up to Outlook for all of them, then the job done. Not until that.
Hi,
>> BTW I do not know, what You think about HTML support, what are You missing
>> in version 4?
It would also help if you could set the display mode per folder
instead of once globally: For example, I have folders for certain
newsletters that I'd like to view as html by default. Everything e
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Marek Mikus wrote:
> seriously, team is finishing with new IMAP integration, but this spends much
> time, because a lot of other code needs to be changed.
I see. Thanks for the clarification. Seriously.
> BTW I do not know, what You think about HTML support, wha
9 matches
Mail list logo