Re: Wish: A more contemporary format of the message size given in the "Size"-column in message list

2011-10-04 Thread Dwight Corrin
On Tuesday, October 4, 2011, 2:51:39 PM, Viktor Kabelac wrote: > you can hardly tell them that > they or their mail contacts are morons (technically, of course you can, but > you'll be doing it at jobs changing in a fast pace). > If there are people sending me mails of 10, 20 or 30 MB (this are >

Re: A more contemporary format of the message size given in the "Size"-column in message list

2011-10-04 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Tuesday, October 4, 2011, 1:23:20, NetVicious wrote: > One mail should not be more greater than 10Mb, so I think the current > way of show the size of the emails it's correct. Why not? The mail servers here are configured to allow messages of up to 166MB, since that's what the users need. >

Re: Wish: A more contemporary format of the message size given in the "Size"-column in message list

2011-10-04 Thread Viktor Kabelac
>> Regarding today's internet capabilities, down- and upload rates, >> harddrive sizes, possible message attachment sizes it seems a lot more >> up to date to show message sizes in Kilobytes (at least) or even >> Megabytes (adequately rounded). Maybe this could be made customizable >> via Prefere