Re: 8.2.0.4 cannot use imap on gmail

2018-01-28 Thread George Μ . Menegakis
Anyone? Any idea?

-- 
That is not dead which can eternal lie,
yet with strange aeons even death may die

On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 7:04 PM, George Μ. Menegakis <menega...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I decided finally to stop using pop3 to get mail and use imap instead.
>
> Problem is when trying to download mail a google authorization page is
> opened and notifies my that I need to authorize The Bat v7 (yes, it says
> v7). No matter how many times I press allow it does nothing and finally
> fetching mail fails
>
> [image: Inline image 1]
>
> Note that in google settings I have ON the setting "Access for less secure
> apps".
>
> From the log:
>
>  25/01/2018, 18:56:59: IMAP  - Connected to IMAP server (imap.gmail.com)
> >25/01/2018, 18:56:59: IMAP  - Gimap ready for requests from
> 2a02:587:2d0f:4a00:ec5e:d681:eec6:f50b d6mb156569965wrc
>  25/01/2018, 18:56:59: IMAP  - Authenticating (user: "menega...@gmail.com",
> method: "XOAUTH2")...
> !25/01/2018, 18:57:04: IMAP  - Authentication failed, IMAP server response
> is "Invalid credentials (Failure)"
>  25/01/2018, 18:57:04: IMAP  - Authenticating (user: "menega...@gmail.com",
> method: "XOAUTH2")...
> !25/01/2018, 18:57:08: IMAP  - Authentication failed, IMAP server response
> is "Invalid credentials (Failure)"
>  25/01/2018, 18:57:08: IMAP  - Authenticating (user: "menega...@gmail.com",
> method: "XOAUTH2")...
> !25/01/2018, 18:57:13: IMAP  - Authentication failed, IMAP server response
> is "Invalid credentials (Failure)"
>  25/01/2018, 18:57:13: IMAP  - Authenticating (user: "menega...@gmail.com",
> method: "XOAUTH2")...
> !25/01/2018, 18:57:18: IMAP  - Authentication failed, IMAP server response
> is "Invalid credentials (Failure)"
>  25/01/2018, 18:57:18: IMAP  - Authenticating (user: "menega...@gmail.com",
> method: "XOAUTH2")...
> !25/01/2018, 18:59:11: IMAP  - Server reports error. The response is:  BYE
> Too many commands before auth d6mb156569965wrc
>
> Please excuse me if this mail is HTML, I' m using the gmail web client
> since I cannot use The Bat!!!
>
> --
> That is not dead which can eternal lie,
> yet with strange aeons even death may die
>

 Current beta is 8.2.4.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


8.2.0.4 cannot use imap on gmail

2018-01-25 Thread George Μ . Menegakis
Hello,

I decided finally to stop using pop3 to get mail and use imap instead.

Problem is when trying to download mail a google authorization page is
opened and notifies my that I need to authorize The Bat v7 (yes, it says
v7). No matter how many times I press allow it does nothing and finally
fetching mail fails

[image: Inline image 1]

Note that in google settings I have ON the setting "Access for less secure
apps".

>From the log:

 25/01/2018, 18:56:59: IMAP  - Connected to IMAP server (imap.gmail.com)
>25/01/2018, 18:56:59: IMAP  - Gimap ready for requests from
2a02:587:2d0f:4a00:ec5e:d681:eec6:f50b d6mb156569965wrc
 25/01/2018, 18:56:59: IMAP  - Authenticating (user: "menega...@gmail.com",
method: "XOAUTH2")...
!25/01/2018, 18:57:04: IMAP  - Authentication failed, IMAP server response
is "Invalid credentials (Failure)"
 25/01/2018, 18:57:04: IMAP  - Authenticating (user: "menega...@gmail.com",
method: "XOAUTH2")...
!25/01/2018, 18:57:08: IMAP  - Authentication failed, IMAP server response
is "Invalid credentials (Failure)"
 25/01/2018, 18:57:08: IMAP  - Authenticating (user: "menega...@gmail.com",
method: "XOAUTH2")...
!25/01/2018, 18:57:13: IMAP  - Authentication failed, IMAP server response
is "Invalid credentials (Failure)"
 25/01/2018, 18:57:13: IMAP  - Authenticating (user: "menega...@gmail.com",
method: "XOAUTH2")...
!25/01/2018, 18:57:18: IMAP  - Authentication failed, IMAP server response
is "Invalid credentials (Failure)"
 25/01/2018, 18:57:18: IMAP  - Authenticating (user: "menega...@gmail.com",
method: "XOAUTH2")...
!25/01/2018, 18:59:11: IMAP  - Server reports error. The response is:  BYE
Too many commands before auth d6mb156569965wrc

Please excuse me if this mail is HTML, I' m using the gmail web client
since I cannot use The Bat!!!

-- 
That is not dead which can eternal lie,
yet with strange aeons even death may die

 Current beta is 8.2.4.1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Re[2]: TB As System Default on W7-64

2011-09-29 Thread George Μ . Menegakis
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 03:11, Paul Van Noord pau...@for-him.net wrote:
 9/29/2011  8:09 PM

 Hi George,

 On 9/29/2011 George M. Menegakis wrote:

   I had hoped with my changing from XP to W7-64 this old problem would
   have been gone: TB is not [fully] used for MAPI or even just MAILTO.

 GMM Furthermore on x64 the exchange protocol is not working. I have
 GMM do some research and it appears to be that in
 GMM order to be able to use the x64 mapi protocol the bat must be
 GMM compiled against it. Since Bat is 32bit
 GMM application and until becomes 64 bit and be compiled against x64 mapi 
 you can forget all that.

 If this is true why does 4.2.44.2 work perfectly here with Win 7 Pro
 64 bit?

I assume that's because you haven't installed Office 2010 64 bit.

The exerpt below is from
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/officedevdocs/archive/2009/11/25/developing-outlook-2010-solutions-for-32-bit-and-64-bit-systems.aspx

MAPI Applications for Outlook
If your existing 32-bit MAPI application is going to be running on a
computer with 64-bit Outlook installed, you will need to rebuild your
32-bit application as a 64-bit application. Outlook 2010 provides a
set of MAPI header files that support MAPI applications to work with
both 32-bit and 64-bit Outlook 2010. Make sure you download these
header files from Outlook 2010: MAPI Header Files and rebuild your
MAPI application using these header files.
In general, the bitness of the MAPI application must be the same as
the bitness of the MAPI subsystem on the computer that the application
is targeted to run on. The bitness of the MAPI subsystem, in turn, is
determined by and always the same as the bitness of the installed
version of Outlook. So if you plan to develop a MAPI application that
will be run on computers with either a 32-bit or 64-bit version of
Outlook 2010 installed, you will need to build two separate versions
of the application, one to work with 32-bit Outlook and one to work
with 64-bit Outlook.
For more information about MAPI support for 64-bit Outlook, see
Building MAPI Applications on 32-Bit and 64-Bit Platforms.
Aside from rebuilding MAPI applications, sometimes it's necessary to
check the version of Outlook to ensure that a MAPI application calls
API elements that are supported by the currently running version of
Outlook.
To learn how to check the version of Outlook and whether the installed
version of Outlook is 64-bit Outlook 2010, see How to: Check the
Version of Outlook.
Also, to learn how to decipher Outlook version information and the
expected values for different parts of a version string for certain
released versions of Outlook, see How to determine Outlook version
information.


 Current beta is 5.0.22.15 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Working MAPI on 64 bit Windows

2011-05-23 Thread George Μ . Menegakis
Is there any chance that the users of 64bit windows got a working
mapi? TB can't use the 64bit outlook mapi and TB's mapi (32 bit) can't
be a primary mapi on an 64 bit windows system.

So, are there plans to address this?

--
That is not dead which can eternal lie,
yet with strange aeons even death may die


 Current beta is 5.0.12.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Working MAPI on 64 bit Windows

2011-05-23 Thread George Μ . Menegakis
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:58, Dierk Haasis
dierk.haa...@dh2publishing.info wrote:
 Hello George!

 On Monday, May 23, 2011 at 10:22:34 AM you wrote:

 Is there any chance that the users of 64bit windows got a working
 mapi? TB can't use the 64bit outlook mapi and TB's mapi (32 bit) can't
 be a primary mapi on an 64 bit windows system.

 Really? I mean, REALLY?

 So, MAPI on XP doesn't work well if Outlook and ActiveSync are
 necessary, but upgrading my whole system to W7 64 will not work
 either? Worse, it would make TB completely useless?

The problem is not with windows 7 64bit but with Office 64bit. While I
don't blame Ritlabs for this, thing is that in order for a MAPI
application to work with 64 bit Outlook installed, the application
should be built as 64 bit application.

Yeah, I know... snowball in hell.

The exerpt below is from
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/officedevdocs/archive/2009/11/25/developing-outlook-2010-solutions-for-32-bit-and-64-bit-systems.aspx

MAPI Applications for Outlook
If your existing 32-bit MAPI application is going to be running on a
computer with 64-bit Outlook installed, you will need to rebuild your
32-bit application as a 64-bit application. Outlook 2010 provides a
set of MAPI header files that support MAPI applications to work with
both 32-bit and 64-bit Outlook 2010. Make sure you download these
header files from Outlook 2010: MAPI Header Files and rebuild your
MAPI application using these header files.
In general, the bitness of the MAPI application must be the same as
the bitness of the MAPI subsystem on the computer that the application
is targeted to run on. The bitness of the MAPI subsystem, in turn, is
determined by and always the same as the bitness of the installed
version of Outlook. So if you plan to develop a MAPI application that
will be run on computers with either a 32-bit or 64-bit version of
Outlook 2010 installed, you will need to build two separate versions
of the application, one to work with 32-bit Outlook and one to work
with 64-bit Outlook.
For more information about MAPI support for 64-bit Outlook, see
Building MAPI Applications on 32-Bit and 64-Bit Platforms.
Aside from rebuilding MAPI applications, sometimes it's necessary to
check the version of Outlook to ensure that a MAPI application calls
API elements that are supported by the currently running version of
Outlook.
To learn how to check the version of Outlook and whether the installed
version of Outlook is 64-bit Outlook 2010, see How to: Check the
Version of Outlook.
Also, to learn how to decipher Outlook version information and the
expected values for different parts of a version string for certain
released versions of Outlook, see How to determine Outlook version
information.


 Current beta is 5.0.12.5 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: tbmapi.dll

2011-04-29 Thread George Μ . Menegakis
On windows 7 64bit I keep getting

!29/04/2011, 15:33:04: FETCH - Cannot connect to the server. Error
loading MAPI Library

I have opened https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=8653

Is there any chance to get a working MAPI in Windows 7 64 bit ?

--
That is not dead which can eternal lie,
yet with strange aeons even death may die


 Current beta is 5.0.9.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.0.0.142

2011-02-23 Thread George Μ . Menegakis
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 20:08, Maxim Masiutin m...@ritlabs.com wrote:
 The Bat! 5.0.0.142 BETA is available at
 http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/a-5/tb500142.rar

 What's new in 5.0.0.142 since 5.0.0.141:

Exchange doesn't work on the last three versions (and maybe earlier, I
haven't checked)

https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=8488

--
That is not dead which can eternal lie,
yet with strange aeons even death may die


 Current beta is 5.0.0.142 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Critical: in 5.0.0.140 and 5.0.0.141 send to through Excange server stopped working

2011-02-21 Thread George Μ . Menegakis
Hello,

Last thursday I first installed 5.0.0.140 at my work but I hadn't try
to send an email. Today I did and the message was kept at outbox. Then
I saw finally the account log:

 21/02/2011, 09:46:31: SEND  - sending mail message(s) - 1 message(s) in queue
 21/02/2011, 09:46:31: SEND  - connected to the Exchange server
MAILVAULT02.xxx.xxx.xx as user menes
 21/02/2011, 09:46:31: SEND  - connection finished - 0 message(s) sent
 21/02/2011, 09:46:31: SEND  - Some messages were not sent - check the
log for details
 21/02/2011, 09:46:43: SEND  - sending mail message(s) - 1 message(s) in queue
 21/02/2011, 09:46:43: SEND  - connected to the Exchange server
MAILVAULT02.xxx.xxx.xx as user menes
 21/02/2011, 09:46:43: SEND  - connection finished - 0 message(s) sent
 21/02/2011, 09:46:43: SEND  - Some messages were not sent - check the
log for details
 21/02/2011, 09:46:44: SEND  - sending mail message(s) - 1 message(s) in queue
 21/02/2011, 09:46:44: SEND  - connected to the Exchange server
MAILVAULT02.xxx.xxx.xx as user menes
 21/02/2011, 09:46:44: SEND  - connection finished - 0 message(s) sent
 21/02/2011, 09:46:44: SEND  - Some messages were not sent - check the
log for details
 21/02/2011, 09:46:54: SEND  - sending mail message(s) - 1 message(s) in queue
 21/02/2011, 09:46:54: SEND  - connected to the Exchange server
MAILVAULT02.xxx.xxx.xx as user menes
 21/02/2011, 09:46:54: SEND  - connection finished - 0 message(s) sent
 21/02/2011, 09:46:54: SEND  - Some messages were not sent - check the
log for details
 21/02/2011, 09:46:55: SEND  - sending mail message(s) - 1 message(s) in queue
 21/02/2011, 09:46:55: SEND  - connected to the Exchange server
MAILVAULT02.xxx.xxx.xx as user menes
 21/02/2011, 09:46:55: SEND  - connection finished - 0 message(s) sent
 21/02/2011, 09:46:55: SEND  - Some messages were not sent - check the
log for details
 21/02/2011, 09:47:45: SEND  - sending mail message(s) - 1 message(s) in queue
 21/02/2011, 09:47:45: SEND  - connected to the Exchange server
MAILVAULT02.xxx.xxx.xx as user menes
 21/02/2011, 09:47:45: SEND  - connection finished - 0 message(s) sent
 21/02/2011, 09:47:45: SEND  - Some messages were not sent - check the
log for details
 21/02/2011, 09:47:46: SEND  - sending mail message(s) - 1 message(s) in queue
 21/02/2011, 09:47:46: SEND  - connected to the Exchange server
MAILVAULT02.xxx.xxx.xx as user menes
 21/02/2011, 09:47:46: SEND  - connection finished - 0 message(s) sent
 21/02/2011, 09:47:46: SEND  - Some messages were not sent - check the
log for details
 21/02/2011, 09:49:58: SEND  - sending mail message(s) - 1 message(s) in queue
 21/02/2011, 09:49:59: SEND  - connected to the Exchange server
MAILVAULT02.xxx.xxx.xx as user menes
 21/02/2011, 09:49:59: SEND  - connection finished - 0 message(s) sent
 21/02/2011, 09:49:59: SEND  - Some messages were not sent - check the
log for details
 21/02/2011, 09:51:48: SEND  - sending mail message(s) - 1 message(s) in queue
 21/02/2011, 09:51:49: SEND  - connected to the Exchange server
MAILVAULT02.xxx.xxx.xx as user menes
 21/02/2011, 09:51:49: SEND  - connection finished - 0 message(s) sent
 21/02/2011, 09:51:49: SEND  - Some messages were not sent - check the
log for details OTE - Central Domain

I installed v5.0.0.141 but the problem wasn't solver. Finally I have
to revert to v4.2.33.9 in order to be able to send mail through
exchange server.

The following are from ex_log.txt

v5.0.0.140 BETA MENEGAKIS/menes 21/02/2011 09:46:31.640
MapiTask:TMapiThread.Execute.DoInitialize EAccessViolation Access
violation at address 00BD677A in module 'thebat.exe'. Read of address

v5.0.0.140 BETA MENEGAKIS/menes 21/02/2011 09:46:31.640 Thread
Finished:TMapiThread 2652
v5.0.0.140 BETA MENEGAKIS/menes 21/02/2011 09:46:38.218 Thread
Started:TMLHTaskThread 5672
v5.0.0.140 BETA MENEGAKIS/menes 21/02/2011 09:46:38.281 Thread
Finished:TMLHTaskThread 5672
v5.0.0.140 BETA MENEGAKIS/menes 21/02/2011 09:46:43.093 Thread
Started:TMapiThread 4592
v5.0.0.140 BETA MENEGAKIS/menes 21/02/2011 09:46:43.312
MapiTask:TMapiThread.Execute.DoInitialize EAccessViolation Access
violation at address 00BD677A in module 'thebat.exe'. Read of address

v5.0.0.140 BETA MENEGAKIS/menes 21/02/2011 09:46:43.328 Thread
Finished:TMapiThread 4592
v5.0.0.140 BETA MENEGAKIS/menes 21/02/2011 09:46:44.328 Thread
Started:TMapiThread 1632
v5.0.0.140 BETA MENEGAKIS/menes 21/02/2011 09:46:44.484
MapiTask:TMapiThread.Execute.DoInitialize EAccessViolation Access
violation at address 00BD677A in module 'thebat.exe'. Read of address

v5.0.0.140 BETA MENEGAKIS/menes 21/02/2011 09:46:44.484 Thread
Finished:TMapiThread 1632
v5.0.0.140 BETA MENEGAKIS/menes 21/02/2011 09:46:45.859 Thread
Started:TMLHTaskThread 2536
v5.0.0.140 BETA MENEGAKIS/menes 21/02/2011 09:46:45.875 Thread
Finished:TMLHTaskThread 2536
v5.0.0.140 BETA MENEGAKIS/menes 21/02/2011 09:46:46.500 Thread
Started:TMLHTaskThread 4292
v5.0.0.140 BETA MENEGAKIS/menes 21/02/2011 09:46:46.500 Thread

Re: full list

2011-01-19 Thread George Μ . Menegakis
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 22:19, Rick rick.grunwald.groupm...@gmail.comwrote:

  * Hello Tbbeta,

Could  you  please  make  a  full  list  what's left to do to make a
release?

 *
 Are not the folder compacting and folder purge and compact descriptions
 redundant?
 *
 *


No, they aren't. Compact removes deleted messages from a folder permenantly.
Purge delete messages from folders, according to rules set
in Folder Properties/General (Maximum Number of stored messages  Keep
messages in the base for X days). Purge  Compact, first
purges then compacts the folder.

 Current beta is 5.0.0.131 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Are the v5 alphas private ?

2010-06-25 Thread George Μ . Menegakis
Hello,

I keep seeing messages about v5 alpha builds but the links are always down.
Is alpha private and if yes could you please move the discussions about it
off-list in order not to confuse us about what's private and what's public ?

-- 
That is not dead which can eternal lie,
yet with strange aeons even death may die

 Current beta is 4.2.33.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 4.1.11.9

2009-04-05 Thread George Μ . Menegakis
 On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 03:41, MAU m...@rancho-k.com wrote:

 Hello Rick,

  Also the Attachments glyph now shows the NUMBER of attachments

 Not until you focus on the Message List pane for the first time and not
 for all messages. See attachment.


And it doesn't work in any virtual folder.

Anyway, I wish this new feature was optional. I don't like it neither
 with the default attachment glyph nor with the one from my Yellowish
 Icons set. Plus, I don't find it useful for anything.


On the contrary I find it very useful provided it works correctly. In all
folders and whether the focus is in the message list or not.

 Current beta is 4.1.11.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html