Re: HTML Error

Guten Tag Thomas Fernandez, am Donnerstag, 30. Juli 2009 um 03:59 schrieben Sie: JF>> I allowed any URL of them >>> If you mean something else by "displaying wrong", kindly elaborate. JF>> It looks displaced in the upper area. There is a Graphic which is JF>> splitted in horizontal direction.

Re: HTML Error

Hello Jens, On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:34:05 +0200 GMT (30/Jul/09, 3:34 AM +0700 GMT), Jens Franik wrote: >> That said, I receive the same newsletter and it looks the same. I did >> not check the URL manager, but I think the only problem is that the >> pictures are not downloaded. JF> I allowed any

Re: HTML Error

Guten Tag Thomas Fernandez, am Mittwoch, 29. Juli 2009 um 04:10 schrieben Sie: JF>> i have found a HTML Message which is displaying wrong: > After download, I had to import this message before I could see it in > TB!. Kindly upload messages in .msg or .eml format, so TB! can dispaly > them right

Re: HTML Error

Hallo Jens, On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:44:00 +0200GMT (28-7-2009, 20:44 +0200, where I live), you wrote: JF> i have found a HTML Message which is displaying wrong: JF> http://www.de2all.de/thebat/HTML-Error-20090728.mbx Confirmed. -- Groetjes, Roelof And those who lack the courage sa

Re: HTML Error

Hello Jens, On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:44:00 +0200 GMT (29/Jul/09, 1:44 AM +0700 GMT), Jens Franik wrote: JF> i have found a HTML Message which is displaying wrong: JF> http://www.de2all.de/thebat/HTML-Error-20090728.mbx After download, I had to import this message before I could see it

HTML Error

Guten Tag   The Bat! Beta, hello @Developers i have found a HTML Message which is displaying wrong: http://www.de2all.de/thebat/HTML-Error-20090728.mbx -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Jens Franik mailto:je...@gmx.de The Bat! 4.2.9.4 + AntiSpamSniper 3.2.1.1 + Gaijin XMP Makro Plugin 1.2 Windows XP

Re[2]: HTML-Error

Hello, > With 3.0.9.8 this problem is fixed. Thanks. Confirmed. -- Regards, Francismailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using TB! 3.0.9.8 Return (pre-beta) on Windows XP rev 2600 Current beta is 3.0.9.8 Return | 'Using

Re: HTML-Error

Hello Martin, Friday, March 18, 2005, 7:02:14 PM, you wrote: > when using 3.0.9.7 I retrieve the HTML Error when displaying the > attached newsletter of Web.de. With 3.0.9.8 this problem is fixed. Thanks. -- Best regards, Martinmailto:[EMAIL PRO

HTML-Error

Hello, when using 3.0.9.7 I retrieve the HTML Error when displaying the attached newsletter of Web.de. It starts to display it shortly and afterwards the error message: Invalid HTML ! Please forward this message to developers. Thanks. EAccessViolation Access violation at address 00CA263B in

Re: Pre Beta 3.0.9.7 HTML Error

Hello Leif Gregory, on Thursday, March 17, 2005 at you wrote: > Hi Tim, > On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, at 17:31:42 [GMT -0500] (which was 3:31 PM where > I live) you wrote: TC>> Its back, uh TC>> Invalid HTML ! TC>> Please forward this message to developers. TC>> Thanks. TC>> EInvalidPointer In

Re: Pre Beta 3.0.9.7 HTML Error

Hi Tim, On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, at 17:31:42 [GMT -0500] (which was 3:31 PM where I live) you wrote: TC> Its back, uh TC> Invalid HTML ! TC> Please forward this message to developers. TC> Thanks. TC> EInvalidPointer Invalid pointer operation Confirmed. I just ran across two. -- Leif -:-

Pre Beta 3.0.9.7 HTML Error

Hello tbbeta, Its back, uh Invalid HTML ! Please forward this message to developers. Thanks. EInvalidPointer Invalid pointer operation -- Best regards, Tim Current beta is 3.0.9.7 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information: http

Re: HTML error warning graphics [was Re:The Bat! 3.0.0.15 ...]

Hi Marcus Williams - On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, at 16:29:50 [GMT +0100] (which was 8:29 AM where I live) you wrote: > I meant _the bat_ should be changed from its current behaviour to a > different behaviour - where the different behaviour is falling back to

Re: Sample of an HTML Error Message.

Hello all, Tuesday, September 14, 2004, Ethan J. Mings wrote: > The following is the best example of a message that generates a HTML > Error Message. Does this help provide some insights for solutions? no error with viewing this message. -- Bye Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat

Re: HTML Error (Was Re: The Bat! 3.0.0.14 Post Release is now available )

Hi Duncan and list, On Monday, September 13, 2004 at 18:47:30 GMT +0100 (which was 19:47 where I live) Duncan Strand wrote (at least in parts) and made these valuable points on the subject of "HTML Error (Was Re: The Bat! 3.0.0.14 Post Release is now available )": > Didn'

Re: HTML Error (Was Re: The Bat! 3.0.0.14 Post Release is now available)

On 2004-09-13 (19:47), you wrote: > Invalid HTML ! Confirmed :[ Best regards, Krzysztof Kudłacik -- pb _, )\__/( ,_ Polska Strona Programu The Bat! | /'.;`-.`{..}',-';.`\ http://thebat.pl | /'.'; `-,`-""-',-' ;`.`\ The Bat! Polish Support | \/\/^\---.\;;/.

Re: HTML Error (Was Re: The Bat! 3.0.0.14 Post Release is now available)

Hi Duncan Strand - On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, at 18:47:30 [GMT +0100] (which was 10:47 AM where I live) you wrote: > Didn't see this in the previous beta: > Invalid HTML ! > Please forward this message to developers. > Thanks. > EAccessViolation Access vio

HTML Error (Was Re: The Bat! 3.0.0.14 Post Release is now available)

Didn't see this in the previous beta: Invalid HTML ! Please forward this message to developers. Thanks. EAccessViolation Access violation at address 00403EEF in module 'thebat.exe'. Read of address 028B1000 -- Duncan Strand www.zebs.org.uk Things I'd Do If I Ever Became An Evil Overlord:

Re[2]: Invalid HTML error -- Again and again and again

Crafted from The Desk on location in the Quality Lab. Hello Mary, Tuesday, September 7, 2004, 4:25:41 PM, you wrote: > I have had this error 4 times, but not so far in v. 3.0.0.8. > However, a simple fix worked each time for me. I switched to PTV and > then immediately back to RTV. At that point

Invalid HTML error -- Again and again and again

Crafted from The Desk on location in the Quality Lab. Hello Keith, Tuesday, September 7, 2004, 12:23:59 PM, you wrote: This is really frustrating. Right in the middle of working, all of the messages reveal some version of the error below. --- | Invalid HTML ! | Please forward

Re[2]: Invalid HTML error

Hello Michael, Monday, September 6, 2004, 11:18:57 PM, you wrote: MLW> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MLW> Hash: SHA1 MLW> Hello Tim, MLW> On Mon, 6 Sep 2004, Tim mused about "Invalid HTML error (was: The Bat! MLW> 3.0.0.7 is now available)" (at least in part): ML

Re: Invalid HTML error

Hi Dierk and list, On Monday, September 6, 2004 at 21:31:00 GMT +0200 (which was 21:31 where I live) Dierk Haasis wrote (at least in parts) and made these valuable points on the subject of "Invalid HTML error": >> No - had a lot of such "HTML errors" on Win2k :-| &g

Re[3]: Invalid HTML error

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Salve Allen, DH>> On Monday, September 6, 2004 at 9:10:13 PM you wrote: >>> No - had a lot of such "HTML errors" on Win2k :-| DH>> And none here, yet. AD> Nor here. I had *one* only on 3.0.0.6, none on 3.0.0.0 and none on 3.0.0.7. Mike - -- As

Invalid HTML error (was: The Bat! 3.0.0.7 is now available)

Hi Peter, on Mon, 6 Sep 2004 19:27:56 +0200GMT, you wrote: 9>> Here is a short list of changes: PF> I wonder why you make a new version before you fix the mother of all PF> bugs - the HTML-error? That must be bugging all users with the RTV PF> several times each day. PF> It i

Re: Invalid HTML error again (was: Re: TheBat! 3.0.0.6 Post Release is now available)

Richard Wakeford, [RW] wrote: > Not here unfortunately. One time every folder I tried gave me the > same message so the only option was to close TB! and start again. > I've never had it happen so violently as that before. Your use of the word 'violently' is very telling. Seeing the error come ou

Re: Invalid HTML error again (was: Re: TheBat! 3.0.0.6 Post Release is now available)

Zeynel A. Öztürk, [ZA] wrote: > I received several invalid HTML errors with this version :(. These > weren't exist on 3.0. Yeah. It took some doing to get back to the previous version. A repair msi installation didn't work. I eventually opened the .msi file in WinRAR, saw the excecutable listed

Re: HTML Error Still in Place - SUGGESTION: don't roll back! It defeats the purpose of betatesting!

Hello Ethan (Jerry?), Tuesday, August 10, 2004, 12:16:03 PM, you wrote: EJM> Hello Mark, EJM> Monday, August 9, 2004, 5:24:31 PM, you wrote: Simply run a beta with a /REG:beta command line switch. Create a new shortcut to the .EXE if necessary. Batty should be surprised and try t

Re: HTML Error Still in Place - SUGGESTION: don't roll back! It defeats the purpose of betatesting!

On Monday, August 9, 2004, at 11:24:31 PM, Mark Partous jumped on the stage, took a mike and sang: M>> ... and first, perhaps, copy the whole TB! directory, from M>> C:\Program Files\The Bat! to, say, C:\Program Files\The Bat! Beta. M>> Drop the .EXE there. Make a shortcut with /REG:beta. Run. C

Re: HTML Error Still in Place - SUGGESTION: don't roll back! It defeats the purpose of betatesting!

Hello MaXxX, Monday, August 9, 2004, 11:13:33 PM, you wrote: >> Simply run a beta with a /REG:beta command line switch. Create a new >> shortcut to the .EXE if necessary. Batty should be surprised and try >> to configure and install itself. Let it. M> ... and first, perhaps, copy the whole TB! d

Re: HTML Error Still in Place - SUGGESTION: don't roll back! It defeats the purpose of betatesting!

On Monday, August 9, 2004, at 11:11:03 PM, a fearless knight known as MaXxX entered the dragon's lair and exclaimed: > Simply run a beta with a /REG:beta command line switch. Create a new > shortcut to the .EXE if necessary. Batty should be surprised and try > to configure and install itself. Let

Re: HTML Error Still in Place - SUGGESTION: don't roll back! It defeats the purpose of betatesting!

On Monday, August 9, 2004, at 11:07:50 PM, Paul Cartwright sculpted a piece of raw silicon into the thoughts below: > On Monday, August 9, 2004, 4:55 PM, you wrote: M>> That is precisely why I made 9Val add the /REG: option to the program. M>> Just set up a separate directory for TB! Beta, and

Re: HTML Error Still in Place - SUGGESTION: don't roll back! It defeats the purpose of betatesting!

On Monday, August 9, 2004, 4:55 PM, you wrote: M> That is precisely why I made 9Val add the /REG: option to the program. M> Just set up a separate directory for TB! Beta, and run it as M> "thebat.exe /reg:beta". how ??? I usually just drop in the .EXE file in the existing folders, how do you inst

Re: HTML Error Still in Place - SUGGESTION: don't roll back! It defeats the purpose of betatesting!

On Monday, August 9, 2004, at 9:45:28 PM, the old mahogany desk trembled gently as Ethan J. Mings began rapidly hitting his squeaky typewriter's keys: > Still HTML violation errors. Still note fixed. > Rolled back. Rolling back defeats the purpose of betatesting! That is precisely why I made 9V

HTML Error Still in Place

Still HTML violation errors. Still note fixed. Rolled back. -- Best regards, Ethan J. Mings E-mail Client: The Bat! (2.12.03) Current beta is 2.13 'Lucky' Beta/3 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLI

Re[2]: HTML error

Crafted from The Desk on location in the Quality Lab. Hello Kevin, Sunday, August 8, 2004, 12:21:00 AM, you wrote: KA>> This error has been around for a long time (at least since early KA>> in the 2.12 beta cycle) for whatever it is worth. > Maybe my luck just ran out, because before the 2.13 se

Re: HTML error

Hi Kevin, On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 09:52:28 -0700 (12:52 PM here), Kevin Amazon [KA] wrote in : KA> This error has been around for a long time (at least since early KA> in the 2.12 beta cycle) for whatever it is worth. Maybe my luck just ran out, because before the 2.13 series I

Re: HTML error

Hi MaXxX - On Sat, 7 Aug 2004, at 19:14:32 [GMT +0200] (which was 10:14 AM where I live) you wrote: > On Saturday, August 7, 2004, at 6:52:28 PM, time seemed to stop as > Kevin Amazon uttered these words: >> This error has been around for a long time (a

Re: HTML error

On Saturday, August 7, 2004, at 6:52:28 PM, time seemed to stop as Kevin Amazon uttered these words: > This error has been around for a long time (at least since early in > the 2.12 beta cycle) for whatever it is worth. An error introduced during a beta cycle and happily included in the release..

Re: HTML error

Hi Kevin Coates - On Sat, 7 Aug 2004, at 12:02:29 [GMT -0400] (which was 9:02 AM where I live) you wrote: > It seems over here I will view messages for awhile with no problems. > Then once I begin to get HTML errors they increase in frequency until > i

Re: HTML error

Dear Kevin, -->> Samstag, 7. August 2004, 18:02:29: > It seems over here I will view messages for awhile with no problems. > Then once I begin to get HTML errors they increase in frequency > until it happens on the majority of messages. I have not concentrated my observation on this. I will

Re: HTML error

Hi Eddie, On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 15:56:34 +0200 (9:56 AM here), Eddie Castelli [EC] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: EC> Never the less 9val I must report an Error. Some eMails (no the EC> once in the different TB!ml) display an HTML Error (see EC> attachments). If this bug is too l

Re: BUG - HTML Error

Hei, Screwyluie wrote: D>> Please send this html > alrighty, here's the html, and to keep people from whining, I > compressed it, so there should be no mishaps I now read Peter's mail 4 times, and I don't see a point which can not be understood. Look, here it is again: | As I see you're on th

Re[2]: BUG - HTML Error

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 D> Please send this html alrighty, here's the html, and to keep people from whining, I compressed it, so there should be no mishaps - -- Murphy's Sixth Law: If you perceive that there are four possible ways in which a procedure can go wrong and ci