Re: Persistant bugs.

2005-07-16 Thread Liz
Hi, In the message mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] which was apparently written on Friday, July 1, 2005, 3:36:32 PM. I believe I wrote: MM Coudl you please enumerate exactly which shourtcuts work wrong way, and we will fix it. L Well one I personally have a bug in for is the but 4084. L The ones I

Re[2]: Persistant bugs.

2005-07-01 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Liz, Saturday, June 25, 2005, 20:19:06, you wrote: short cuts that dont work when pressed short cuts that have different keys depending on where you look short cuts that dont work depending on the view because well it just Coudl you please enumerate exactly which shourtcuts work wrong

Re: Persistant bugs.

2005-07-01 Thread Liz
Hi Maxim, In the message mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] which was apparently written on Friday, July 1, 2005, 3:16:22 PM. I believe you wrote: MM Coudl you please enumerate exactly which shourtcuts work wrong way, and we will fix it. Again?? Well one I personally have a bug in for is the but 4084.

Re: Re[2]: Persistant bugs.

2005-07-01 Thread Gleason Pace
Maxim, Could you please enumerate exactly which shourtcuts work wrong way, and we will fix it. Cntrl-m does not mark all messages read. -- Gleason Current beta is 3.5.36 | 'Using TBBETA' information:

Re: Persistant bugs.

2005-07-01 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Friday, July 1, 2005, 9:16:22 AM, Maxim Masiutin wrote: Coudl you please enumerate exactly which shourtcuts work wrong way, and we will fix it. There are lots of former shortcuts in the menu structure which no longer function. One I used to use a lot was 'AltF, i' to reindex. There was

Re[4]: Persistant bugs.

2005-07-01 Thread Gleason Pace
Maxim, Could you please enumerate exactly which shourtcuts work wrong way, and we will fix it. Cntrl-m does not mark all messages read. But in 36 it does. -- Gleason Using The Bat! v3.5.36 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Primarily using the Fastmail IMAP server which

Re: Persistant bugs.

2005-07-01 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Alexander, on Fri, 1 Jul 2005 18:40:45 +0200GMT (01.07.2005, 18:40 +0200GMT here), you wrote: Cntrl-m does not mark all messages read. ASK ALL messages? It never did that here. ctrl+M marks all messages of a folder as read when the focus is on the folder pane. Still works as it used to.

Re: Persistant bugs.

2005-07-01 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Peter Meyns everyone else, on 01-Jul-2005 at 19:03 you (Peter Meyns) wrote: ctrl+M marks all messages of a folder as read when the focus is on the folder pane. Still works as it used to. OK. I have the focus on the message list usually. -- Best regards, Alexander

Keyboard shortcuts (was: Persistant bugs.)

2005-07-01 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Alexander, on Fri, 1 Jul 2005 19:22:18 +0200GMT (01.07.2005, 19:22 +0200GMT here), you wrote: ctrl+M marks all messages of a folder as read when the focus is on the folder pane. Still works as it used to. ASK OK. I have the focus on the message list usually. Me too. But shift+tab quickly

Re: Keyboard shortcuts (was: Persistant bugs.)

2005-07-01 Thread aam
A Bat-fellow, Peter Meyns, wrote on Friday, 1st July 2005 at 20:06:04 (GMT +0200), which was ditto in Bratislava -- ctrl+M marks all messages of a folder as read when the focus is on the folder pane. Still works as it used to. OK. I have the focus on the message list usually. Me too. But

Re: Keyboard shortcuts (was: Persistant bugs.)

2005-07-01 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Peter Meyns everyone else, on 01-Jul-2005 at 20:06 you (Peter Meyns) wrote: ctrl+M marks all messages of a folder as read when the focus is on the folder pane. Still works as it used to. ASK OK. I have the focus on the message list usually. Me too. But shift+tab quickly reverses it,

Re[3]: Persistant bugs.

2005-07-01 Thread Munango-Keewati
On Friday, July 1, 2005, 9:16:22 AM, Maxim Masiutin wrote: Hello Liz, Saturday, June 25, 2005, 20:19:06, you wrote: short cuts that dont work when pressed short cuts that have different keys depending on where you look short cuts that dont work depending on the view because well it just

Re: Persistant bugs.

2005-06-26 Thread Tony Boom
--On Saturday, June 25, 2005 8:07 pm +0300 Maxim Masiutin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Which of the presistent bugs are trivial to fix, could you please specify? I could tell you one that you seem unable to fix if you want? -- Tony iMac

Re: Persistant bugs.

2005-06-26 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hello Tony, just now you (Tony Boom) wrote: Which of the presistent bugs are trivial to fix, could you please specify? I could tell you one that you seem unable to fix if you want? ;-) Who can't guess what you'll be telling him?! :D BTW: Did you look at the date-header? *Very* confusing

Re: Persistant bugs.

2005-06-26 Thread Tony Boom
--On Sunday, June 26, 2005 7:06 pm +0200 Manuel Breitfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW: Did you look at the date-header? *Very* confusing over here when I look in the message source: I always check the date header before I send every message :) Strange that, I was using a time sever

Persistant bugs.

2005-06-25 Thread Liz
Im not sure I speak for everyone, but I know Im not alone. There are a big number of persistant bugs that any developer should feel are trivial to fix, but, that seem to be constantly overlooked. The bugs database doesnt seem to be used to perform the functions it should, since version

Re: Persistant bugs.

2005-06-25 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Liz, Saturday, June 25, 2005, 19:45:27, you wrote: There are a big number of persistant bugs that any developer should feel are trivial to fix, but, that seem to be constantly overlooked. Which of the presistent bugs are trivial to fix, could you please specify? -- Best regards, Maxim

Re: Persistant bugs.

2005-06-25 Thread Liz
Hi Maxim, In the message mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] which was apparently written on Saturday, June 25, 2005, 6:07:15 PM. I believe you wrote: There are a big number of persistant bugs that any developer should feel are trivial to fix, but, that seem to be constantly overlooked. MM Which