Hi,
In the message mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] which was
apparently written on Friday, July 1, 2005, 3:36:32 PM. I believe I wrote:
MM Coudl you please enumerate exactly which shourtcuts work wrong way, and we
will fix it.
L Well one I personally have a bug in for is the but 4084.
L The ones I
Hello Liz,
Saturday, June 25, 2005, 20:19:06, you wrote:
short cuts that dont work when pressed
short cuts that have different keys depending on where you look
short cuts that dont work depending on the view because well it just
Coudl you please enumerate exactly which shourtcuts work wrong
Hi Maxim,
In the message mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] which was
apparently written on Friday, July 1, 2005, 3:16:22 PM. I believe you wrote:
MM Coudl you please enumerate exactly which shourtcuts work wrong way, and we
will fix it.
Again??
Well one I personally have a bug in for is the but 4084.
Maxim,
Could you please enumerate exactly which shourtcuts work wrong way, and
we will fix it.
Cntrl-m does not mark all messages read.
--
Gleason
Current beta is 3.5.36 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
On Friday, July 1, 2005, 9:16:22 AM, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
Coudl you please enumerate exactly which shourtcuts work wrong way,
and we will fix it.
There are lots of former shortcuts in the menu structure which no
longer function.
One I used to use a lot was 'AltF, i' to reindex. There was
Maxim,
Could you please enumerate exactly which shourtcuts work wrong way, and
we will fix it.
Cntrl-m does not mark all messages read.
But in 36 it does.
--
Gleason
Using The Bat! v3.5.36 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 2 Primarily using the Fastmail
IMAP server which
Hi Alexander,
on Fri, 1 Jul 2005 18:40:45 +0200GMT (01.07.2005, 18:40 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
Cntrl-m does not mark all messages read.
ASK ALL messages? It never did that here.
ctrl+M marks all messages of a folder as read when the focus is on
the folder pane. Still works as it used to.
Hello Peter Meyns everyone else,
on 01-Jul-2005 at 19:03 you (Peter Meyns) wrote:
ctrl+M marks all messages of a folder as read when the focus is on the
folder pane. Still works as it used to.
OK. I have the focus on the message list usually.
--
Best regards,
Alexander
Hi Alexander,
on Fri, 1 Jul 2005 19:22:18 +0200GMT (01.07.2005, 19:22 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
ctrl+M marks all messages of a folder as read when the focus is on the
folder pane. Still works as it used to.
ASK OK. I have the focus on the message list usually.
Me too. But shift+tab quickly
A Bat-fellow, Peter Meyns,
wrote on Friday, 1st July 2005 at 20:06:04 (GMT +0200),
which was ditto in Bratislava --
ctrl+M marks all messages of a folder as read when the focus is on the
folder pane. Still works as it used to.
OK. I have the focus on the message list usually.
Me too. But
Hello Peter Meyns everyone else,
on 01-Jul-2005 at 20:06 you (Peter Meyns) wrote:
ctrl+M marks all messages of a folder as read when the focus is on
the folder pane. Still works as it used to.
ASK OK. I have the focus on the message list usually.
Me too. But shift+tab quickly reverses it,
On Friday, July 1, 2005, 9:16:22 AM, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
Hello Liz,
Saturday, June 25, 2005, 20:19:06, you wrote:
short cuts that dont work when pressed
short cuts that have different keys depending on where you look
short cuts that dont work depending on the view because well it just
--On Saturday, June 25, 2005 8:07 pm +0300 Maxim Masiutin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Which of the presistent bugs are trivial to fix, could you please specify?
I could tell you one that you seem unable to fix if you want?
--
Tony
iMac
Hello Tony,
just now you (Tony Boom) wrote:
Which of the presistent bugs are trivial to fix, could you please
specify?
I could tell you one that you seem unable to fix if you want?
;-) Who can't guess what you'll be telling him?! :D
BTW: Did you look at the date-header? *Very* confusing
--On Sunday, June 26, 2005 7:06 pm +0200 Manuel Breitfeld
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW: Did you look at the date-header? *Very* confusing over here when I
look in the message source:
I always check the date header before I send every message :)
Strange that, I was using a time sever
Im not sure I speak for everyone, but I know Im not alone.
There are a big number of persistant bugs that any developer should
feel are trivial to fix, but, that seem to be constantly overlooked.
The bugs database doesnt seem to be used to perform the functions it
should, since version
Hello Liz,
Saturday, June 25, 2005, 19:45:27, you wrote:
There are a big number of persistant bugs that any developer should
feel are trivial to fix, but, that seem to be constantly overlooked.
Which of the presistent bugs are trivial to fix, could you please specify?
--
Best regards,
Maxim
Hi Maxim,
In the message mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] which was
apparently written on Saturday, June 25, 2005, 6:07:15 PM. I believe you wrote:
There are a big number of persistant bugs that any developer should
feel are trivial to fix, but, that seem to be constantly overlooked.
MM Which
18 matches
Mail list logo