Re: TB! UI Bug in the Sorting Office

2004-08-24 Thread DZ-Jay
Some time around 08/23/2004 06:22:50, I think I heard Roelof Otten say: Hallo DZ-Jay, On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 06:11:06 -0400GMT (23-8-2004, 12:11 +0200, where I live), you wrote: DJ So you mean that if I decide not to upgrade to the latest version DJ I won't get bug fixes for mine, even though I

Re: TB! UI Bug in the Sorting Office

2004-08-24 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo DZ-Jay, On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 04:52:10 -0400GMT (24-8-2004, 10:52 +0200, where I live), you wrote: DJ So you mean that if I decide not to upgrade to the latest version DJ I won't get bug fixes for mine, even though I paid for it? DJ So you mean to tell me that, as opposed to every other

Re: TB! UI Bug in the Sorting Office

2004-08-24 Thread DZ-Jay
Some time around 08/24/2004 04:55:37, I think I heard George M. Menegakis say: Ritlabs are famous for the point releases. The version x.xx may have major new functionality over x.x(x-1). I don't know about you but I love RIT guys for this. New functionality is ok, in fact, its great! I really

Re: TB! UI Bug in the Sorting Office

2004-08-24 Thread DZ-Jay
Some time around 08/24/2004 05:05:58, I think I heard Roelof Otten say: You were complaining about a bug in the sorting office and Maurice told you that it wasn't likely to be fixed, because in the current beta cycle the sorting office is being replaced by something new (and better when it's

Re: TB! UI Bug in the Sorting Office

2004-08-23 Thread Maurice Snellen
On Sunday, August 22, 2004 at 18:09 (which was Monday, August 23, 2004 at 0:09 where I am) Dz-Jay [DJ] wrote: DJ tab, the combo box for the Location field of any set above the DJ last one is hidden behind the next set, and therefore you cannot DJ choose anything lower than text (which itself is

TB! UI Bug in the Sorting Office

2004-08-22 Thread DZ-Jay
Hello: I recently discovered this UI bug in the Sorting Office: When you have more than one rule sets in the Alternatives tab, the combo box for the Location field of any set above the last one is hidden behind the next set, and therefore you cannot choose anything lower than text