On Monday, 11 July 2005 at 07:55 AM, Jay Walker wrote:
Accordingly to your link, the basic package has HTTP/IMAP...
You are right, Goncalo. No POP3 unless you pay, but HTTP/IMAP even
for free. So what is HTTP/IMAP?
Just a webinterface?
--
Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de
On 7/11/05, Manuel Breitfeld wrote:
On Monday, 11 July 2005 at 07:55 AM, Jay Walker wrote:
Accordingly to your link, the basic package has HTTP/IMAP...
You are right, Goncalo. No POP3 unless you pay, but HTTP/IMAP even
for free. So what is HTTP/IMAP?
Just a webinterface?
That would
Hello Jay,
Monday, July 11, 2005, 9:46:32, you wrote:
That would be my guess. And, if so, the Lycos offers local POP3 access
only with a paid account and no local IMAP access, even with a paid
account. So, should that be the case, there really does not seem to be
much interconnect with Ritlabs
Hello all,
I saw this error message today during TB's start, any further
description about this error is missing.
Max, what this means?
--
Thanks and Bye,
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz
Using the best The Bat! 3.51
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Allie,
On 09-07-2005 21:10, you [AM] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
AM Each time the message draft is to be auto-saved while composing, I
AM get the following error:
AM - !9/7/2005, 14:06:42: IMAP - 1: Could not compose the message for
AM uploading Please verify the amount of free disk space
Hi all,
Of late, I've been getting pretty frequent episodes where the message
counts/flagging update requests for a mailbox is stuck in the queue.
This is easily seen via the CC. As a result, the message count for the
mailbox is stuck and flag changes for the mailbox occurs only locally in
the
On Monday, July 11, 2005 at 4:24:19 AM [GMT -0500], Peter Fjelsten
wrote:
I have been working with 9Val for a resolution of this for months (not
constantly). Ritlabs are definitely aware of the problem.
It's a complex problem since the typical client uses a draft folder.
When you wish to
Allie,
On 11-07-2005 11:33, you [AM] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
AM Looks like with a server side outbox, the queued mail for delivery
AM is stored on the server.
Yes they are. If you manage to get mail to save/upload properly it is
available from other locations (i.e., not local), too.
--
Hello,
TB forwards HTML messages as .EML by default - can this be changed?
Background: in an Exchange environment, its very likely that Outlook is the
main email client. However, Outlook doesn't open .EML, but .MSG (which is
the same thing, of course).
The problem is that .EML is associated
Hello all,
Monday, July 11, 2005, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
TB forwards HTML messages as .EML by default - can this be changed?
Background: in an Exchange environment, its very likely that Outlook is the
main email client. However, Outlook doesn't open .EML, but .MSG (which is
the same thing,
Hello!
[The Bat 0004777]: Alt+Click in Folder-Maintenance and Ctrl+Click in Search-Fold
http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4777
==
There are two different hints (hot clicks):
Alt+Click in Folder-Maintenance
and
Ctrl+Click
Hello!
Old bug:
http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4194
Open checkbox in dispatcher causes open another
message instead checked
(POP3)
I start dispatcher. I select messages to receive and delete.
One of them I check for open.
TB shows me one of the messages in the same folder as parameter
in
Hello Marek,
Monday, July 11, 2005, 12:36:41 PM, you wrote:
when was .MSG used before, *many* users asked to change it to EML,
because OE users are unable to see MSG attachments sent by TB, because OE
is unable to display that, only EML is allowed.
OMG... why wasn't that made configurable?
Alexander,
On 11-07-2005 13:26, you [ASK] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ASK Nevertheless, I *still* hope that some day we will get real HTML
ASK forwarding (ie. not as an attachment)...
Me too - as people are sending me HTML mail here at work. Never use the
thing myself.
--
greeting Best
On 7/11/05, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
Monday, July 11, 2005, 9:46:32, you wrote:
That would be my guess. And, if so, the Lycos offers local POP3 access
only with a paid account and no local IMAP access, even with a paid
account. So, should that be the case, there really does not seem to be
much
7/11/2005 7:32 AM
Hi Marek,
On 7/11/2005 Marek Mikus wrote:
MM when was .MSG used before, *many* users asked to change it to EML,
MM because OE users are unable to see MSG attachments sent by TB, because
MM OE is unable to display that, only EML is allowed.
MM And now, what You want to
miércoles, 6 jul 2005 at 16:34, it seems you wrote:
1) If you are spanish but don't want any other language you are out of
luck. You have to install all of them
Me I want English. I do _not_ american, however Spanish is useful at times.
You could get English+Spanish only in
Hello Alexander,
when was .MSG used before, *many* users asked to change it to EML,
because OE users are unable to see MSG attachments sent by TB, because OE
is unable to display that, only EML is allowed.
OMG... why wasn't that made configurable? The difference between the two is
the
Marek Mikus wrote:
Hello all,
I saw this error message today during TB's start, any further
description about this error is missing.
Max, what this means?
This is a WinSock error. It means the socket in question (which one, I
do not know, but I would guess it is related to TB!) is already
7/11/2005 11:13 AM
Hi Vili,
On 7/11/2005 Vili wrote:
V B.lls..t :) Assign EML to Outlook, and case solved. Isn't it a LITTLE
V strange, that EML is open by OE and MSG with Outlook??? Why email
V clients must confirm this mixed up method of MS??? Why TB! can open
V each of them?
WELL
Hello Vili everyone else,
on 11-Jul-2005 at 16:56 you (Vili) wrote:
Open the original mail, Forward, in the editor window save the attach,
rename and attach again.
Don't tell me you think this is a solution. I don't know how many of these
darn HTML mail a day I forward to my co-workers.
I
Hello Paul Van Noord everyone else,
on 11-Jul-2005 at 13:34 you (Paul Van Noord) wrote:
MM And now, what You want to do?
As part of the IMAP setup offer an option to change the file extension.
Why only IMAP? Everyone should be able to send the attachments the way they
want.
--
Best
7/11/2005 1:09 PM
Hi Alexander,
On 7/11/2005 Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
As part of the IMAP setup offer an option to change the file extension.
ASK Why only IMAP? Everyone should be able to send the attachments the way they
ASK want.
In my experiences defaulting to OE file format reaches
7/11/2005 1:02 PM
Hi Alexander,
On 7/11/2005 Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
ASK Do you think anyone in a business environment uses Outlook Express?
Sadly, in the US there are many small to mid-size businesses using OE.
I have to deal with them constantly. Fortunately, most of them are now
TB
Hello Paul Van Noord everyone else,
on 11-Jul-2005 at 19:17 you (Paul Van Noord) wrote:
In my experiences defaulting to OE file format reaches more people. IMAP
users are more inclined to be corresponding with Outlook users.
So it should be configurable how attachments are sent, as I've
Hello Alexander,
Open the original mail, Forward, in the editor window save the attach,
rename and attach again.
Don't tell me you think this is a solution. I don't know how many of these
darn HTML mail a day I forward to my co-workers.
It is only a workaround.
I just said that it is a bit
Hello Vili everyone else,
on 11-Jul-2005 at 21:16 you (Vili) wrote:
I am curious, what would you do, if Outlook 2006 will decide to use EML
and not MSG... The whole world will change? :(
Repeat mode: the format of the attachment should be configurable.
TB can open both of them, but thats
On Monday, July 11, 2005 @ 4:26:02 AM [-0700], Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Nevertheless, I *still* hope that some day we will get real HTML
forwarding (ie. not as an attachment)...
But, we do get it now don't we?
Configure Account - Templates - Forward - Uncheck Forward messages as
attachments
Hello Alexander,
TB can open both of them, but thats not the problem. TB should be able
to *send* both of them.
It can.
Then please tell me how I can switch from .EML to .MSG as a default.
You cannot switch. But you can send EML or MSG. That's what I said.
Until it solved, you have to
On Monday, July 11, 2005, 2:55:58 PM, Vili wrote:
You cannot switch. But you can send EML or MSG. That's what I
said. Until it solved, you have to play the save EML, rename, MSG
attach game...
you can save either if saving is the question. just pull down the
choices in the save dialogue
On Monday, July 11, 2005, 1:55:26 PM, Matt Thoene wrote:
Configure Account - Templates - Forward - Uncheck Forward messages
as attachments (MIME Standard).
By unchecking the above, I am able to forward html/non-html inline
without the extension issues.
I have the above ticked. When I
Hello Dwight,
I thought that alternate forward forwarded the message in one of those
formats, but what I thought was going to do that when I tested just
forwarded the message I was testing in it's original plain text
format.
Yes, that is good only for text messages...
What Alexander wants
On Monday, July 11, 2005, at 21:28:34 [UTC+0200] (Monday, July 11, 2005
21:28 my local time) Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Then please tell me how I can switch from .EML to .MSG as a default.
Here is only a temporary workaround which I used sometimes:
1. Export message to the .MSG file
2. Create
On Monday, July 11, 2005, 3:35:18 PM, Zygmunt Wereszczynski wrote:
Then please tell me how I can switch from .EML to .MSG as a
default.
It is much easier to just save the message in which ever format you
choose, then attach it to a message.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS
Hello Dwight A Corrin everyone else,
on 11-Jul-2005 at 23:25 you (Dwight A Corrin) wrote:
Then please tell me how I can switch from .EML to .MSG as a
default.
It is much easier to just save the message in which ever format you
choose, then attach it to a message.
It is still nothing but a
Hello Matt Thoene everyone else,
on 11-Jul-2005 at 20:55 you (Matt Thoene) wrote:
Configure Account - Templates - Forward - Uncheck Forward messages as
attachments (MIME Standard).
By unchecking the above, I am able to forward html/non-html inline
without the extension issues.
When I
This is a forwarded message replying to
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
sorry won't thread, but wanted to forward this, and ask why this isn't
a perfectly acceptable way to forward an html message
From: Slate Magazine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Saturday, July 9, 2005, 5:10:53 AM
Hello Dwight A Corrin everyone else,
on 11-Jul-2005 at 23:46 you (Dwight A Corrin) wrote:
sorry won't thread, but wanted to forward this, and ask why this isn't
a perfectly acceptable way to forward an html message
Its not in-line its not editable. I have to do that all the time at work.
Hello Dwight A Corrin everyone else,
on 11-Jul-2005 at 23:36 you (Dwight A Corrin) wrote:
I just timed the process and I saved the message and forwarded it to
myself as a .msg file in about 12 seconds.
Come on, I bet you can do it in 11! :-)
--
Best regards,
Alexander
On Monday, July 11, 2005, 4:50:05 PM, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
its not editable
well, that is horse of a different color. I thought we were talking
about forwarding, and so editing didn't cross my mind. Sorry.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568
On Monday, July 11, 2005, 4:51:55 PM, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Come on, I bet you can do it in 11! :-)
If I had remembered where I saved the message and hadn't had to go
back and recreate some of the process, I could have done it quicker
than that. The notion of a workaround is that it is
On Monday, July 11, 2005 @ 2:35:10 PM [-0700], Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
By unchecking the above, I am able to forward html/non-html inline
without the extension issues.
When I forward an HTML message with the option unticked, I get a plain text
message. All HTML formattings are lost. TB
On Monday, July 11, 2005, 1:55:26 PM, Matt Thoene wrote:
By unchecking the above, I am able to forward html/non-html inline
without the extension issues.
When I do that, I get the same thing as what I forwarded to the list
which was said to not be what was needed because the HTML was not
On Monday, July 11, 2005 @ 3:00:32 PM [-0700], Dwight A Corrin wrote:
If I had remembered where I saved the message and hadn't had to go
back and recreate some of the process, I could have done it quicker
than that. The notion of a workaround is that it is somehow bogging
one down.
But I
On Monday, July 11, 2005 @ 2:58:30 PM [-0700], Dwight A Corrin wrote:
its not editable
well, that is horse of a different color. I thought we were talking
about forwarding, and so editing didn't cross my mind. Sorry.
Oops...the editing part didn't cross my mind either.
Uh..look at that
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
OMG... why wasn't that made configurable? The difference between the two is
the extension and nothing else.
V Open the original mail, Forward, in the editor window save the attach,
V rename and attach again.
Do you see yourself doing that several times a
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
MM Hello Jay,
MM Monday, July 11, 2005, 9:46:32, you wrote:
That would be my guess. And, if so, the Lycos offers local POP3
access only with a paid account and no local IMAP access, even with
a paid account. So, should that be the case, there really
Hello Maxim,
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 14:16:27 +0300 GMT (01/07/2005, 18:16 +0700 GMT),
Maxim Masiutin wrote:
MM 3.5.36 is available at www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
I know I need to use RMB on toolbar / Customise / etc to edit
shortcuts. However, this makes the function unaccessable to newbies.
Any
Hello Thomas,
Monday, July 11, 2005, 8:56:15 PM, you wrote:
TF I know I need to use RMB on toolbar / Customise / etc to edit
TF shortcuts. However, this makes the function unaccessable to newbies.
TF Any chance we can get a menu item Edit shortcuts under the Tools
TF menu? this would also make it
Hello Goncalo,
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
OMG... why wasn't that made configurable? The difference between the two is
the extension and nothing else.
V Open the original mail, Forward, in the editor window save the attach,
V rename and attach again.
Do you see yourself doing that
Hello Dwight A Corrin everyone else,
on 11-Jul-2005 at 23:58 you (Dwight A Corrin) wrote:
its not editable
well, that is horse of a different color. I thought we were talking
about forwarding, and so editing didn't cross my mind. Sorry.
I know... I know... I started with .MSG against .EML
Hello Matt Thoene everyone else,
on 12-Jul-2005 at 00:10 you (Matt Thoene) wrote:
When I forward an HTML message with the option unticked, I get a plain text
message. All HTML formattings are lost. TB can't forward HTML inline. Same
goes for replying. All HTML formattings are lost.
This
52 matches
Mail list logo
