Received From: Leif Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Paul,
Tuesday, November 16, 2004, 7:43:31 PM, you wrote:
P Thanks for fixing my ignorance! I never knew TLS and SSL were
P synonymous!
You've now been moderated by all three moderators for the same
issues.
moderator
Note: This moderator's
Received From: Peter Fjelsten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul,
On 17-11-2004 17:20, you [PVN] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
PVN I am ready to receive something of substance. I never cease to be
PVN amazed at how much effort is given to the insignificant.
With this attitude I doubt anyone will give
Received From: Peter Fjelsten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul,
Please do no include your reply after a (-- ) + new line. This way it is
automatically removed on reply. The (-- ) is a signature delimiter. Try
to reply to your own message (in TB!) to see what happens.
On 17-11-2004 18:20, you [PVN] wrote
Received From: Avi Yashar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:15:50 +0100, Dierk Haasis wrote:
SMTP and POP3 - making it easy to send and receive Gmail via TB -
there was bound to be some discussion about configuration and the
like. As I said, Gmail is hot - not necessarily good - but
11/19/04 6:56 AM
Received From: Tony Boom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Avi,
A reminder of what Avi Yashar on TBBETA typed on:
19 November 2004 at 12:24:45 GMT +0200
So I am also not a happy camper on this point
Then do as I have done and write directly to Gmail Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Read
joined it. Since that is the
case you have two choices: Accept the rules of the list or leave the
list. Your disrespectful comments are becoming overbearing and totally
out of place.
--
Paul Van Noord
TB beta 3.0.2.10 on Win2k Pro 5.00.2195
, will appreciate it immensely.
--
Paul Van Noord
TB beta 3.0.2.10 on Win2k Pro 5.00.2195
Weakness of attitude becomes weakness of character. - Albert Einstein
Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com
1/22/2005 11:27 AM
Was it always like this?
Shouldn't you be using the latest beta 3.0.2.10?
--
Paul Van Noord
TB beta 3.0.2.10 on Win2k 5.00.2195
Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com
1/22/2005 6:18 PM
Perhaps Ritlabs also missed the thread about the 3.0.2.10 release.
I got mine at:
http://www.softpedia.com/get/Others/Signatures-Updates/The-Bat.shtml
--
Paul Van Noord
TB beta 3.0.2.10 on Win2k 5.00.2195
Current
Van Noord
TB beta 3.0.2.10 on Win2k 5.00.2195
Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en
assessment because you not only didn't try the latest
beta, you also were not aware of its existence even though it is a
month old and has been appearing in the signatures of most of the
messages in this forum.
--
Paul Van Noord
Current beta
Van Noord
Intellectuals solve problems; geniuses prevent them.
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
-- Albert Einstein
Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
1/23/2005 5:55 AM
AY Anyway, it seems that there are other symbols besides apostrophes
AY that gum up the Quote Name Limit feature. I now find problems with
AY names that include a strudel (@) or a hyphen/dash (-).
AY Was it always like this?
Not confirmed here.
--
Paul Van Noord
TB beta
On 2/13/2005 Allie Martin wrote:
AM Guys ... I'm sorry, but as a veteran member, I can't sing along with
AM that chorus and feel sympathy for Avi who has experienced and
AM injustice here.
2/13/2005 2:37 PM
Hi Allie,
Ever since I joined this forum a few months ago, two individuals have
On 2/13/2005 Avi Yashar wrote:
AYjust to see if a new beta had been
AY released for me to test).
2/13/2005 2:49 PM
Hi Avi,
Based on recent information this topic should at least rest until the
afternoon of February 29! Agreed?
--
Take Care,
Paul
The Bat! v.3.0.2.10 on Win2k SP4
On 2/13/2005 Maxim Masiutin wrote:
MM It's better to underpromise and overperform than to overpromise and
underperform.
2/13/2005 3:03 PM
Hi Maxim,
Amen! I totally agree!
--
Take Care,
Paul
The Bat! v.3.0.2.10 on Win2k SP4
On 2/15/2005 Avi Yashar wrote:
AY And my point was only that you asked a general question that you could
AY have answered for yourself if you only looked at some of the earlier
AY correspondence on this thread - a quite substantial amount.
Too bad you do not apply this principle to your own
On 2/22/2005 Tony Boom wrote:
TBA bit like asking for a
TB Rasberry Ripple ice cream and getting plain vanilla.
2/22/2005 6:03 AM
Hi Tony,
D e e p A l p h a
We will always be disappointed when we expect more than we deserve.
This thread has wasted more of the reader's time than I want
On 2/25/2005 Tony Boom wrote:
TFC wow that's sad to see thebat users to closed mind
TB Nothing to do with closed minds. Most people on here chose TB!
TB specifically because of it's inability to handle html. You go changing
TB that and everyone will have to find another client.
2/25/2005
On 2/25/2005 The Final Cut wrote:
TFC You must be kidding to think ppl would have to switch to
TFC another email client if thebat download images from web.
TFC As mentionned _many_ times, that would work with a
TFC whitelist and the most important, the option would be disabled by
TFC default.
On 2/25/2005 The Final Cut wrote:
TFC 3. peers? show me some and your sources
2/25/2005 7:34 AM
Hi The,
Eudora, OE, Outlook, etc.
--
Take Care,
Paul
The Bat! v.3.0.2.10 on Win2k SP4
Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using
On 2/25/2005 Dave Gorman wrote:
DG unusability of any of these. Outhouse and Outhouse Express especially
DG are in a class of their own when it comes to bloat and security flaws.
True, the outs are in a class by themselves. However, Thunderbird
emulates more of the look feel of the outs than I
On 2/25/2005 Mark Partous wrote:
MP Content : one company logo and a table of values, 2 pages in total.
MP Size: 912 kb.
MP After reformating by me : 54 kb. with a minimal loss of quality (if one
looks
MP carefully, it can be seen in the logo).
2/25/2005 9:14 AM
Hi Mark,
HTML messages
On 2/25/2005 Mark Partous wrote:
MP You silly boy, the group of long-time users said, you don't know what you
MP are talking about.
MP And at the end of another day of nice driving in their beloved old car, all
MP went to sleep in their bed.
MP Not without opening the doors of their car of
On 2/25/2005 Richard Wakeford wrote:
RW someone. Alright, there are many people out there who don't know how to
RW do that but I want my pictures in my camera to be of the highest quality
RW possible thank you :-)
2/25/2005 11:00 AM
Hi Richard,
A 1600x1200 picture reduced to 320x240 for
On 2/25/2005 Dave Gorman wrote:
DG Granted, there are many end users who will not know the ramifications of
DG their choices. Buy why should my computing experience be diminished or
DG made more inconvenient for no reason other than to prevent the stupid
DG users from screwing things up?
On 2/25/2005 Dennis Hays wrote:
DH What we all have in common, on this list, are the reasons we
DH originally came to TB! And, from a marketing point of view,
DH these have to be respected. I don't think most of us looked at
DH this product because of its fine HTML viewer.
2/25/2005 2:27 PM
On 2/25/2005 David Calvarese wrote:
DC Someone on this list called Pocomail a 'child's toy', but it's a child's
DC toy that has basic functionality that TB! is currently lacking. Both
DC the HTML/Image issue as well as (IIRC) proper IMAP support.
2/25/2005 2:25 PM
Hi David,
Conversely, POCO
On 2/25/2005 David Calvarese wrote:
DC We just want the option to be able to click
DC a button and have it display them if we want it too. And possibly being
DC able to tag an address in the address book to 'Display Remote Images' or
DC even 'Trust HTML email from people in your address book',
On 2/25/2005 AC Martin wrote:
AM BTW, if the neophyte is curious about TB! not loading images, they'll
AM ask us and we'd be the first to tell them to *simply* open the message
AM in their browser, leaving them at risk, even if we warn them. :)
2/25/2005 8:12 PM
Hi AC,
Speak for yourself.
On 2/25/2005 Allie wrote:
A Furthermore, if
A TB! loaded the images, what would make it compromise the machine more
A than if Opera were to load those same images?
2/25/2005 9:09 PM
Hi Allie,
If you must click on an icon and wait for a browser to load there is
opportunity to think about your
On 2/26/2005 Mic Cullen wrote:
MC But as an analogy, that's one of the most ridiculous I've seen. Ever.
2/26/2005 10:51 AM
Hi Mic,
Seems right at home with some others that were offered.
--
Take Care,
Paul
The Bat! v.3.0.2.10 on Win2k SP4
On 2/26/2005 Goncalo Farias wrote:
GF It doesn't work very well when you need to reply to the message.
2/26/2005 10:55 AM
Hi Goncalo,
I have no clue what this means...
--
Take Care,
Paul
The Bat! v.3.0.2.10 on Win2k SP4
On 2/26/2005 David Calvarese wrote:
DC All we want is the option to be able to view it correctly
DC withough having to use a web browser, thus letting us reply to it if we
DC need/want to.
2/26/2005 10:57 AM
Hi David,
I have never been challenged to reply to an HTML message. What is the
On 2/26/2005 Thomas Fernandez wrote:
PVN They can selectively download attachments when circumstances
PVN warrant it on a case by case basis. If the configuration files
PVN are made inaccessible to the user so they are protected from
PVN themselves,
TF Please do not protect *me* from myself. I
On 2/26/2005 NetVicious wrote:
The problem here it's this:
N Spammer A sends a spam-mail to you with the from email as
N [EMAIL PROTECTED] In your TB! you have this address in the
N whitelist of downloading images.
N The mail has a transparent image from a php file with a
On 2/26/2005 Goncalo Farias wrote:
PVN I have never been challenged to reply to an HTML message. What is the
PVN problem?
GF Then you should try it first and argue with us after it!
2/26/2005 7:35 PM
Hi Goncalo,
You seem challenged with an understanding of English. I do it all the
time with
On 2/26/2005 Goncalo Farias wrote:
GF can you reply below the quotes you want to reply to and strip the non
GF relevant issues instead of replying below the whole message?
This is done when pertinent, please review previous messages.
GF And, I know this is a pain in the arse, your signature
2/27/2005 6:19 AM
Hi Leif,
On 2/26/2005 Leif Gregory wrote:
LG Happy Tony? Now you drug me into this! :-)
Very well said!
--
Take Care,
Paul
The Bat! v.3.0.2.10 on Win2k SP4
Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA'
2/27/2005 6:29 AM
Hi Mic,
On 2/27/2005 Mic Cullen wrote:
MC If you have even a vague clue as to what you are doing, that statement is
MC utterly false.
My monitor only shows 96 dpi, what is yours?
--
Take Care,
Paul
The Bat! v.3.0.2.10 on Win2k SP4
2/27/2005 8:20 AM
Hi Mary,
On 2/27/2005 Mary Bull wrote:
MB This is so that I can protect myself from inadvertently putting a
MB graphics image into a message-text bodyin the View Folder window.
MB I am just one old-lady user. But I think perhaps there are others with
MB my needs using TB!,
3/15/2005 3:36 PM
Hi Mary,
On 3/15/2005 Mary Bull wrote:
MB And what noun is more important than Wife?
Husband?
--
Take Care,
Paul
The Bat! v.3.0.2.10 on Win2k SP4
Current beta is 3.0.9.5 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information:
3/15/2005 3:31 PM
Hi MAU,
On 3/15/2005 MAU wrote:
M http://dictionary.reference.com/help/faq/language/c/capitalization.html
M The one that applies to this case says: Family relationship names when
M they precede a name or are used in place of person's name, especially in
M direct address.
M
3/16/2005 6:29 AM
Hi Manuel,
On 3/16/2005 Manuel Breitfeld wrote:
MB You're right. That was what I was thinking of. We have global
MB templates and folder templates. It's pure logic that folder templates
MB should have higher priority.
Absolutely anything specific to an entity smaller(or
3/16/2005 12:49 PM
Hi Leif,
On 3/16/2005 Leif Gregory wrote:
LG I've tried it minimized and maximized but it never shows up in
LG Applications. It may be that when I minimize it goes to tasktray
LG instead of the taskbar, so that might account for it.
As long as TB! is visible on my screen it
3/17/2005 7:24 AM
Hi Alexander,
On 3/16/2005 Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
ASK At the moment I can't (or don't want to) go thru the hassle of trying to
ASK get a pre-beta (whatever that should be I don't care, didn't sign up as a
ASK pre-beta tester) to work, so I stick with 3.0.2.10, and given the
3/31/2005 12:01 PM
Hi MAU,
On 3/31/2005 MAU wrote:
M So, I guess I am back to my old, good, stable and reliable v3.0.2.10 for
M some time.
I'm with you all the way! Eye candy has a huge price.
--
Take Care,
Paul
The Bat! v.3.0.2.10 on Win2k SP4
4/1/2005 10:27 AM
Hi Leif,
On 4/1/2005 Leif Gregory wrote:
LG Yes, this may seem steep. A burden unbearable. But please, remember,
LG that'll buy us a whole boatload of Big Macs with a large fry and a
LG coke.
Happy April Fool day to you too! If the above is true and you eat that
junk, we
4/15/2005 5:16 AM
Hi Allie,
On 4/14/2005 Allie Martin wrote:
AM However, I need good evidence of commitment to really get the thing
AM working soon without explanations that we have to make do because of
AM POP3 architecture getting in the way as well as priority issues putting
AM IMAP on the
4/17/2005 4:18 PM
Hi Mary,
On 4/17/2005 Mary Bull wrote:
MB Hello Greg!
MB On Sunday, April 17, 2005, 11:00 AM, you wrote:
Since you use TB and are behind a router you are fairly safe already. I
suggest as a test to turn off both your FW AV completely, then see if
you can receive email.
4/19/2005 8:40 AM
Hi Mary,
On 4/19/2005 Mary Bull wrote:
MB Now, one more reason I'm glad that I didn't.
I have not used M$ Office since version '97 and have been overjoyed
with the performance, stability and security of my and my customers'
machines. The very capable OpenOffice 2 and
5/12/2005 8:37 AM
Hi MAU,
On 5/12/2005 MAU wrote:
M You may be right but, in any case, double-click has always worked to
M open attachments in editor window. At least till version 3.0.2.10 as I
M have just verified right now and, probably, during some of the betas of
M this cycle (I can't
6/6/2005 6:29 AM
Hi Bill,
On 6/5/2005 Bill McCarthy wrote:
However, Alt-L fails to preserve two spaces between sentences.
This is an old rule that is hardly used anymore. It is time to
modernize and trash the double space between sentences.
BM Without handling this common format rule, this
6/6/2005 6:16 PM
Hi Goncalo,
On 6/6/2005 Goncalo Farias wrote:
BM Without handling this common format rule, this editor sucks!
GF We see so much garbage in the list I
GF really don't see why wanting the possibility to open an external
GF editor should be such a case for flame
6/16/2005 10:24 AM
Hi Avi,
On 6/16/2005 Avi Yashar wrote:
AY On 6/16/05, Avi Yashar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/16/05, Avi Yashar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/16/05, Maxim Masiutin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[-] Double click didn't work in folder selection dialog.
6/16/2005 10:57 AM
Hi Charlene,
On 6/16/2005 Charlene Ferrara wrote:
CF Just a remark: many programs leave their regfiles undeleted, it is not
CF only TB. Nevertheless, TB should keep its own house clean.
True.
--
Take Care,
Paul
The Bat! v.3.0.2.10 on Win2k SP4
6/16/2005 12:56 PM
Hi Avi,
On 6/16/2005 Avi Yashar wrote:
AY Good grief
I can't take any more of this nonsense.
AY which generally appears on the warez lists within
AY hours of any production-level release.
Interesting...so why do _you_ know this?
AY pure and simple, then let it be the pure
6/18/2005 8:15 AM
Hi Avi,
On 6/18/2005 Avi Yashar wrote:
AY On top of all this I have noticed one regrettable security lapse in
AY OTFE. When uninstalling TB via the Control Panel, no password is
AY required. In other words, anyone could conceivably come along and
AY uninstall TB and wipe out
6/18/2005 8:15 AM
Hi Avi,
On 6/18/2005 Avi Yashar wrote:
AY On top of all this I have noticed one regrettable security lapse in
AY OTFE. When uninstalling TB via the Control Panel, no password is
AY required. In other words, anyone could conceivably come along and
AY uninstall TB and wipe out
6/18/2005 4:49 PM
Hi Goncalo,
On 6/18/2005 Goncalo Farias wrote:
GF When it asks and the user consents? (just being a little democratic
GF here)
I have been a consultant for 16 years and have experienced way too
many improperly answered questions regarding data removal. I firmly
believe
6/19/2005 7:58 AM
Hi Avi,
On 6/19/2005 Avi Yashar wrote:
AY Alexander, one of the main reasons for encrypting a data base is
AY because others might get access to your computer for one reason or
AY another. Realistically speaking, these things happen; and, if I were a
AY betting man, I would
6/19/2005 9:20 AM
Hi Avi,
On 6/19/2005 Avi Yashar wrote:
How is that?
AY I just assumed it is body odor, Goncalo.
Ass/U/med. Isn't interesting that we usually assume the things that we
have experience with.
--
Take Care,
Paul
Never argue with a fool, people may not be able to tell who is
6/19/2005 9:10 AM
Hi Goncalo,
On 6/19/2005 Goncalo Farias wrote:
GF How is that?
If I told you everyone on this forum could have access.
--
Take Care,
Paul
Never argue with a fool, people may not be able to tell who is who.
The Bat! v.3.0.2.10 on Win2k SP4
6/20/2005 6:17 AM
Hi Peter,
On 6/20/2005 Peter Fjelsten wrote:
PF Your constant complaints/sarcastic/ironic/whatever are getting to be a
PF bit tiresome.
PF (I know I am not moderator but I thought I'd let you know what I - and
PF others(?) - feel)
I agree! It seems three members of this
6/20/2005 11:33 AM
Hi Tony,
On 6/20/2005 Tony Boom wrote:
TB Hello Paul.
TB --On 20 June 2005 06:20 -0400 you wrote about Re[2]: 3.5.27:
I agree! It seems three members of this forum get their recreation
from this type of stuff
TB I can't speak for the other two (perhaps if my name was
6/22/2005 8:35 AM
Hi Avi,
On 6/22/2005 Avi Yashar wrote:
AY On 6/22/05, Roelof Otten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Define 'painfully slow'. Over here it's 75 sec to find three messages
among 12280 messages, that's kind of reasonable, I think.
AY 5-10 minutes to search a folder withless than
6/23/2005 10:52 AM
Hi Maxim,
On 6/23/2005 Maxim Masiutin wrote:
MM Hello ,
MM Could you please aswer very important questions about editors in The Bat!
MM 1. What are the disadvantages of Windows Editor comparing
MM to MicroEd, and what features of MicroEd that you are really
MM using, you
6/25/2005 6:26 AM
Hi Charlene,
On 6/25/2005 Charlene Ferrara wrote:
CF Hi Avi Yashar,
CF Saturday, June 25, 2005
CF you let us know -at least in parts- :
Charlene, to see this bug, you must go to OptionsPreferencesSystem
Hot Keys and set up a hotkey for Check Mail for ALL Accounts and
6/25/2005 6:56 AM
Hi Alto,
On 6/25/2005 Alto Speckhardt wrote:
AM IMO, you shouldn't be using IMAP.
AS I have to, for these reasons:
AS - I want seperate folders with the ability of server-side filtering by
AS my provider.
AS - I want to be able to use both a mail client and my provider's
6/25/2005 10:36 AM
Hi Michael,
On 6/25/2005 Michael Acklin wrote:
MA Saturday, June 25, 2005, 4:34:03 AM, (Internet Time - ) you wrote:
MA Hello Charlene,
CF At first I did not use my own shortcut but the old known Alt+F2
CF keystroke. This one works and opens CC in foreground as it should.
6/25/2005 10:28 AM
Hi Alto,
On 6/25/2005 Alto Speckhardt wrote:
AS Indeed. RIT aparently thought that thousands and thousands of editors
AS were doing it all wrong and invented their own system.
Change and improvement doesn't happen unless someone is willing to be
bold enough to go outside
6/25/2005 1:27 PM
Hi Alto,
On 6/25/2005 Alto Speckhardt wrote:
AS Hi Alex,
Indeed. RIT aparently thought that thousands and thousands of
editors were doing it all wrong and invented their own system.
ASK No, thats not what I meant.
AS I understood you perfectly well. However, in this case
6/30/2005 9:05 PM
Hi Kevin,
On 6/30/2005 Kevin Menard wrote:
But, I finally had to come to the realization that things
KM are just bad. Enough is enough.
As shown below I have been successfully using 3.0.2.10 for some time.
If the heat of beta testing becomes unbearable why not revert to a
7/5/2005 5:57 PM
Hi Tony,
On 7/5/2005 Tony Boom wrote:
TB --On 5 July 2005 15:32:04 -0400 Vili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Next time write something like this:
TB I sincerely hope your joking and not telling me what I can and what I can't
TB write to this list?
It is REPRODUCIBLE, I did
7/6/2005 8:16 PM
Hi Ron,
On 7/6/2005 Ron Secord wrote:
RS Any chance of getting an .rar file to download? I can't even get the
RS .msi to start.
Something might have damaged your MSIexec files. Check the information
at:
7/10/2005 8:31 AM
Hi Roelof,
On 7/10/2005 Roelof Otten wrote:
BA try adding a 20meg attachment that'll slow the bat up
BA something badly.
RO As I'm writing this message, I'm getting my 47 MB (yes, that is how
RO big a 33 MB attachment gets on an almost empty message) message back
7/11/2005 7:32 AM
Hi Marek,
On 7/11/2005 Marek Mikus wrote:
MM when was .MSG used before, *many* users asked to change it to EML,
MM because OE users are unable to see MSG attachments sent by TB, because
MM OE is unable to display that, only EML is allowed.
MM And now, what You want to
7/11/2005 11:13 AM
Hi Vili,
On 7/11/2005 Vili wrote:
V B.lls..t :) Assign EML to Outlook, and case solved. Isn't it a LITTLE
V strange, that EML is open by OE and MSG with Outlook??? Why email
V clients must confirm this mixed up method of MS??? Why TB! can open
V each of them?
WELL
7/11/2005 1:09 PM
Hi Alexander,
On 7/11/2005 Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
As part of the IMAP setup offer an option to change the file extension.
ASK Why only IMAP? Everyone should be able to send the attachments the way they
ASK want.
In my experiences defaulting to OE file format reaches
7/11/2005 1:02 PM
Hi Alexander,
On 7/11/2005 Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
ASK Do you think anyone in a business environment uses Outlook Express?
Sadly, in the US there are many small to mid-size businesses using OE.
I have to deal with them constantly. Fortunately, most of them are now
TB
7/12/2005 6:41 AM
Hi Peter,
On 7/12/2005 Peter Hampf wrote:
PH IMO it must be possible to compress a folder after removing an attachment
PH from any message.
Seems logical to me as a programmer. I have found it significantly
more valuable to store attachments in a separate folder.
7/15/2005 7:22 AM
Hi Mary,
On 7/15/2005 Mary Bull wrote:
OK, new encountered utf-8 related issues.
1) Switching between Plain Text MicroEd to Plain Text Windows looses all
text in case when charset of message being edited is utf-8. All other
charsets seems to work.
Bug report:
7/15/2005 11:19 AM
Hi Mary,
On 7/15/2005 Mary Bull wrote:
MB Hello Mary!
MB On Friday, July 15, 2005, 9:49 AM, you wrote:
... When I tried to send [a post reporting the problem] ... I got an
error report: Server reports error. Domain dutaint.co.id does not
accept mail from local host.
7/17/2005 5:19 PM
Hi Mary,
On 7/17/2005 Mary Bull wrote:
MB Just a test to see if The Bat! beta version 3.0.2.10 still works as
MB well as I remember it having done in the past. :)
It sure does!!
--
Take Care,
Paul
The Bat! v.3.0.2.10 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
7/18/2005 7:43 AM
Hi Jay,
On 7/18/2005 Jay Walker wrote:
JW I would definitely have opted out of that cycle.
Opportunity is knocking! Seize it!
--
Take Care,
Paul
The Bat! v.3.0.2.10 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
Current beta is
7/21/2005 6:35 AM
Hi Vili,
On 7/20/2005 Vili wrote:
Setting the destination folder to a move/copy action to the default
is more sensible, so that the other actions can still be run.
V I agree. BUT TB! SHOULD NOT DO what I did not command it to do. You
V can argue, but you are on the
7/21/2005 3:32 PM
Hi Dwight,
On 7/21/2005 Dwight A Corrin wrote:
DAC There is an instance of overkill. The filters are going to have to be
DAC a lot easier to search thru than they are now. Vili just mentioned he
DAC has over 200 filters.
Perhaps a filter text search tool is in order.
7/21/2005 5:16 PM
Hi Dwight,
On 7/21/2005 Dwight A Corrin wrote:
DAC I think one should be able to do lots of searching in filters. One
DAC should also be able to make an alphabetical list, or better have the
DAC filters in alpha order without changing the order of the actual
DAC searches.
7/22/2005 6:46 AM
Hi Natasha,
On 7/22/2005 Natasha V Pearce wrote:
NVP Hoi Paul
When a filter attempts to act on a nonexistent folder, let it create
the
folder.
NVP This functionality is already available. In the folder dialog of the
Copy/Move
NVP filter action, there's a
7/26/2005 9:49 AM
Hi Dimitry,
On 7/26/2005 Dimitry Andric wrote:
DA This means that thebat_pro_3-51.msi is not the original .msi file
DA that you installed your old The Bat with. You need a copy of that to
DA complete the uninstall. It's a completely braindead system, I agree,
DA but that's
8/1/2005 6:41 AM
Hi Vili,
On 8/1/2005 Vili wrote:
V Hello Alexander,
C:\Documents and Settings\User\Application Data\The Bat!\tbuser.def
And sometimes it can also cause BayesIt to hang :((( I like Program
files/The Bat! better.
In a multiuser environment (like anything from Win NT4
8/1/2005 6:36 AM
Hi Ian,
On 7/31/2005 Ian A. White wrote:
IAW Hi,
IAW I had reason to move an addressbook entry from one group to another.
IAW I double clicked on the entry and changed the group there, only when I
IAW OK'd the dialog, the entry was still in the original group. Closing
IAW
8/2/2005 6:28 AM
Hi Roland,
On 8/1/2005 Roland wrote:
R Select the address you want to move and use Cut and Paste.
R The same to move an entire group from an addressbook to another one.
R It runs easy and fast here ;-)
Good idea. I have used it in the past. The behavior isn't a challenge
for
8/2/2005 6:47 AM
Hi Greg,
On 8/1/2005 Greg Strong wrote:
GS PROBLEM when copying from Excel 2002 to HTML email. So my original comment
GS stands, but only apparently to newer versions of Excel. Hmmm? Sorry about
the
GS HTML email, but think it is appropriate, otherwise give me my 1st
8/2/2005 2:35 PM
Hi Roger,
On 8/2/2005 Roger Phillips wrote:
RP Many thanks also to all the others who responded to my request for
RP tests with various versions of Excel. The combined effort located the
RP problem area and presumably will help Rilabs correct the problem.
As I see it
8/3/2005 7:45 PM
Hi Richard,
On 8/3/2005 Richard Newman wrote:
RN Hello Jay,
RN Wednesday, August 3, 2005, 5:49:12 PM, you wrote:
As I experience 3.51.10, it is heavy and slow - as opposed to other
more friendly versions that were light and fast. With 3.51.10, I am
RN I'm finding exactly
8/15/2005 8:04 PM
Hi Michael,
On 8/15/2005 Michael Acklin wrote:
MA Written At Monday, August 15, 2005, 18:49:43
MA Hello All,
MAFirst off, I just got this from a friend and would like to share it
MAwith you all. I am an American and this particular quote made me
MAstart
8/16/2005 3:56 PM
Hi NetVicious,
On 8/16/2005 NetVicious wrote:
N Please, cut your message before replying. F4 key it's a must in the
N TB!
Yeah, I know. I was distracted and then hit send before the trim job.
As usual I wear out the eraser before the lead. Hasta luego.
--
Take Care,
8/18/2005 7:32 AM
Hi Stuart,
On 8/18/2005 Stuart Hemming wrote:
SH It would be nice to be able to change the From name and reply-to name
I do this regularly by using the history for these fields. Faster than
a QT, I think.
--
Take Care,
Paul
The Bat! v.3.0.2.10 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1
8/18/2005 2:27 PM
Hi Vili,
On 8/18/2005 Vili wrote:
V Hello Mary,
Instead of jumping from the last header field to the body of the
message, the cursor jumps to the Attachments Pane.
V Yes, but it is normal...
Not normal through version 3.0.2.10.
--
Take Care,
Paul
The Bat! v.3.0.2.10
1 - 100 of 765 matches
Mail list logo
