Re: Memory leak, 2. (WAS Video Issue?)

2008-04-20 Thread Hendrik Oesterlin
Kertész Vilmos wrote on 19/04/2008 at 23:26:50 +1100 
subject Memory leak, 2. (WAS Video Issue?) :

 Ok, I found the cause of the HUGE VM size and I think the slowdowns: 

 - start TB. It is like 50 MB VM at me.

 - open the Mail Editor to write a mail

 The  size  of  the  VM shoots up to 125 MB... It is not lowered when I
 send the mail or close the mail editor.
  
 Isnt it a little too much increase?

 Also, I tested it with v4 Voyager, there is NO significant VM size 
 increase when opening the Mail Editor window. I use MicroEd in both.

 Confirmation?

I have no significant increase here. 87,3 to 89,4 MB

-- 
Sincerely 
Hendrik Oesterlin - email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TheBat! 4.0.20.4 -   Bayes Filter Plugin v2.0.4  
Extended Macro Plugin 1.1.9.0 - Windows 2000



___ 
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de



 Current beta is 4.0.20.4 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Memory leak, 2. (WAS Video Issue?)

2008-04-19 Thread Rick
 Ok, I found the cause of the HUGE VM size and I think the slowdowns: 

 - start TB. It is like 50 MB VM at me.

 - open the Mail Editor to write a mail

 The  size  of  the  VM shoots up to 125 MB... It is not lowered when I
 send the mail or close the mail editor.
  
 Isnt it a little too much increase?

 Also, I tested it with v4 Voyager, there is NO significant VM size 
 increase when opening the Mail Editor window. I use MicroEd in both.

 Confirmation?

I am not seeing the memory jump as you are but it is definitely
related to using the mail editor (I am also using microed) i.e. a reply, new 
message etc.

-- 
Rick
Are we in the Post-Bush era yet?

v4.0.20.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 2

 



 Current beta is 4.0.20.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: memory leak

2008-03-14 Thread Volker Ahrendt
[Reply to: »Jan Rifkinson« · 2008-03-14 · 21:14 h (CET)]

Moin, Jan!

 Has anyone noted a memory leak in the current betas? Trying to track
 something down.

Quite the contrary – v4.0.x is much better than the v3.99.x in this
point.

At the moment (running some hours) 15MB RAM/61MB virtual Memory,
minimized 3MB/61MB.

HTH

Cheers!
VA

- --
QA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] — [2008-03-14]
Direct eMail without [tbb] in subject line will end in Nirvana!
Using The Bat! 4.0.18 [Pro] on Windows XP [Pro] Service Pack 2.

»A common mistake that people make when trying to design something
completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete
fools.« – Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001), »Mostly Harmless«






 Current beta is 4.0.18 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: memory leak

2008-03-14 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Friday, March 14, 2008, 20:46:35, Volker Ahrendt wrote:

 At the moment (running some hours) 15MB RAM/61MB virtual Memory,
 minimized 3MB/61MB.

Hint: when a program is minimised it doesn't use any less memory,
Windows only swaps most of it's working set out to swap file.

-- 
 Jernej Simončič  http://eternallybored.org/ 

[The Bat! v4.0.18 on Windows XP Professional x64 Edition 5.2.3790.Service Pack 
2]

If God had intended us to go around naked, He would have made us that way.
   -- Olum's Observation (and see Martha's Maxim and Farrow's Finding)



 Current beta is 4.0.18 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Memory Leak

2007-12-05 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Ethan,

Sunday, November 25, 2007, 3:47:23 PM, you wrote:

EJM Can anyone verify this problem? 

I can't look for the reason, I can only confirm that this .25 version also
uses more memory than (seems) necessary and predecessors did.


-- 
Best Wishes,
Mark 
   
using 
The Bat! Version 3.99.25 
MyMacros 1.11a

zOmbie's Macros Version 0.7 
Windows 2000 Professional/5.0 build 2195 Service Pack 4 (0 days 20:38:44) on
Uno AMD Duron




 Current beta is 3.99.29 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Memory Leak

2007-11-29 Thread Mike Rourke
 Hello Ethan,

Sunday, November 25, 2007, 8:47:23 AM, you scribbled:

EJM Sunday, November 25, 2007

EJM I continue to experience some sort of memory leak with the current
EJM official version of The Bat.  After about half of a day of use, it
EJM moves from 57, 232 K to just under 180, 000K.  Even when I minimize the
EJM program, it still continues to escalate.

EJM Can anyone verify this problem?  By the way, I have not plug ins
EJM installed and I'm running Windows XP Pro latest update on a dual core
EJM machine with 4 Gigs of memory

EJM Jerry

I just came back to TB! from Thunderbird (after a year) to see how
things are going. I keep notes from all my software trials and
tribulations. TB! used to use about 24K maximized and would drop well
below 10K minimized before. Now, I get 30K on opening, it stays at 30K
minimized. After a few hours I am over 50K. I am using the same
computer, same e-mail accounts as I was a year ago. The only
difference is that this is a clean reinstall of XP SP 2. I believe
something has changed with TB!

Since I began this e-mail, TB! has gone from 30K to 58K. Sigh
and IMAP still sucks too Every time I give TB! a chance, it
disappoints. :(

-- 
Regards,
 Mike

TheBat! 3.99.29 on Windows XP



 Current beta is 3.99.29 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Memory Leak

2007-11-25 Thread Kertész Vilmos
 I continue to experience some sort of memory leak with the current
 official version of The Bat.  After about half of a day of use, it
 moves from 57, 232 K to just under 180, 000K.  Even when I minimize the
 program, it still continues to escalate.
 Can anyone verify this problem?  By the way, I have not plug ins
 installed and I'm running Windows XP Pro latest update on a dual core
 machine with 4 Gigs of memory

I just sent a mail about it before I read your mail :)))

-- 
Vili
The Bat 3.99.6 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Szervizcsomag 2



 Current beta is 3.99.29 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Memory leak?

2005-07-21 Thread Wayne Howard
WH One more thing that I noticed on this topic: Open The Bat! and
WH close it without doing anything else. Do this several times.
WH Notice how the memory footprint increases significantly each
WH time!! I am now up to 67 MB after about 8 or 10 times!

I substantially reduced the number of messages that I have stored in
TB and while performance has improved, it is still using 47 MB. The
amount of memory used still increases the longer it is running and the
number of times I run it before I reboot to clear the memory.

-- 
Cheers!
Wayne Howard

Using The Bat! version: 3.51.7
Directory Opus 8: The Explorer replacement and File Management solution for 
Windows
See the tutorial: Getting to know Directory Opus: 
www.pretentiousname.com/opus/index.html#introduction




 Current beta is 3.51.7 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Memory leak?

2005-07-21 Thread Wayne Howard
Hello Vili,

On Thursday, July 21, 2005, at 6:57:46 AM, you wrote
re: Memory leak?:

V As I learnt it, it came with new GUI, and Robo is working on it to fix
V it.

I am fairly new to the list, I'm not sure what you mean. Is Robo one
of the developers? In other words, if this issue is being looked into,
then I am satisfied and I will stop posting about it.

Thanks for your reply!

-- 
Cheers!
Wayne Howard

Using The Bat! version: 3.51.7
Directory Opus 8: The Explorer replacement and File Management solution for 
Windows
See the tutorial: Getting to know Directory Opus: 
www.pretentiousname.com/opus/index.html#introduction




 Current beta is 3.51.7 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Memory leak?

2005-07-21 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Wayne!

On Thursday, July 21, 2005, 12:25 PM, you wrote:

V As I learnt it, it came with new GUI, and Robo is working on it to fix
V it.

 I am fairly new to the list, I'm not sure what you mean. Is Robo one
 of the developers? In other words, if this issue is being looked into,
 then I am satisfied and I will stop posting about it.

Yes, Robo is one of the developers.

Vili is one of the more knowledgeable contributors to this list,
additional information to you, Wayne, as a new list-member; really
glad to have you aboard .

Vili comes with very good credentials (like so many members here).
Among other things he's told us, he is a Hungarian distributor of The
Bat! and runs a Hungarian TB! support list.

-- 
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.51.7 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2







 Current beta is 3.51.7 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Memory leak?

2005-07-19 Thread Wayne Howard
Hello Clive,

On Sunday, July 17, 2005, at 7:37:06 AM, you wrote
re: Memory leak?:

 When I start TB!, it takes 38 MB RAM. After reading some mail and
 sending one out, it takes 46 MB. Sometimes it goes up to 57 MB and
 it becomes slow to CLOSE the mails and CLOSE TB! itself. Now I didnt
 use IMAP (removed temporarly), while I tried.

CT This is an old problem that's been discussed and reported here a
CT number of times. It's obviously low on Ritlab's list of priorities to
CT resolve (if they have one).

One more thing that I noticed on this topic: Open The Bat! and close
it without doing anything else. Do this several times. Notice how the
memory footprint increases significantly each time!! I am now up to 67
MB after about 8 or 10 times!

This is a significant problem! I would hope that it is HIGH on the
list of priorities to fix.

-- 
Cheers!
Wayne Howard

Using The Bat! version: 3.51.5
Directory Opus 8: The Explorer replacement and File Management solution for 
Windows
See the tutorial: Getting to know Directory Opus: 
www.pretentiousname.com/opus/index.html#introduction




 Current beta is 3.51.5 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Memory leak?

2005-07-17 Thread Goncalo Farias







Inreplytomid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:


VHellotbbeta,

VWhenIstartTB!,ittakes38MBRAM.Afterreadingsomemailand
Vsendingoneout,ittakes46MB.Sometimesitgoesupto57MBandit
VbecomesslowtoCLOSEthemailsandCLOSETB!itself.NowI
Vdidntuse
VIMAP(removedtemporarly),whileItried.

VButwithIMAP,Ihaveseenmorememoryconsumption,sometimesitis
VrelatedwhenIamjustclosingthecoverofmylaptop(hybernate?)
VwhileIMAPisconnected.

VSo,couldyouoffermeasoftware,thatIcouldrunandthatwould
Vsavethememoryneedsofaspecificsoftware(TB!:))every5secinto
Vafile?OrisamonitorprogrambuiltintoWinXP?Youcanmonitorfree
Vram,Iknowthat,butthatisnotgoodnow...

IhaveTB!runningforalmostanhour,I'mreplyingtoTBBetaandthisitthememoryconsumption.




--
Bestregards,
GoncaloFarias

Aliberal'sgenerosityisonlylimitedbyyourincome.


 Current beta is 3.51.4 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: Memory leak?

2005-07-17 Thread Clive Taylor
 When I start TB!, it takes 38 MB RAM. After reading some mail and
 sending one out, it takes 46 MB. Sometimes it goes up to 57 MB and
 it becomes slow to CLOSE the mails and CLOSE TB! itself. Now I didnt
 use IMAP (removed temporarly), while I tried.

This is an old problem that's been discussed and reported here a
number of times. It's obviously low on Ritlab's list of priorities to
resolve (if they have one).

-- 
Regards,
Clive Taylor
TheBat!:3.51.4
Windows XP: Service Pack 2



 Current beta is 3.51.4 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Memory leak?

2005-07-16 Thread Wayne Howard
Hello Vili,

On Saturday, July 16, 2005, at 3:21:26 PM, you wrote
re: Memory leak?:

V When  I  start  TB!,  it  takes 38 MB RAM. After reading some mail and
V sending  one out, it takes 46 MB. Sometimes it goes up to 57 MB and it
V becomes  slow  to CLOSE the mails and CLOSE TB! itself. Now I
V didnt use
V IMAP (removed temporarly), while I tried.

I have noticed my system slowing down substantially myself. I used
Task Manager to monitor what you say and found the same. This is VERY
disturbing. Hopefully this will be fixed soon!

-- 
Cheers!
Wayne Howard

Using The Bat! version: 3.51.4
Directory Opus 8: The Explorer replacement and File Management solution for 
Windows
See the tutorial: Getting to know Directory Opus: 
www.pretentiousname.com/opus/index.html#introduction




 Current beta is 3.51.4 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Memory leak in the last version, I found it! :)))

2005-07-16 Thread Michael Acklin
Saturday, July 16, 2005, 2:27:26 PM, (Internet Time - @852) you wrote:

Hello Vili,

 V Hello tbbeta,

V Ok, I found the cause of the memory leak. I know, that there must be
V a leak, I felt it :) ...:

V 1. Check the mem. need of TB! in task manager. Lets say it is X MB.

V 2.  Ctrl+N,  new mail. And just close it, dont do anything. Repeat it,
V for example 10 times.

V 3.  Check the mem. need of TB! in task manager. It will be ca. X+3 MB.
V So, more email you send, more RAM will be used up...

V I did not try it by sending, I guess, that would cause a leak, too.

Vili try this nice little program called Process Explorer. It is
basically a task manager on steroids. I have been able to troubleshoot
many applications and determine what the problem is. Sounds like you
have already figured it out, but this will show you more in depth
analysis...

http://www.sysinternals.com/Utilities/ProcessExplorer.html

BTW it is freeware with no spyware :)


-- 

Best regards,
 Michael mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! Version 3.51.4

Windows XP Professional/5.1 Service Pack 2 (build 2600) on a Single/Athlon XP 
(Thoroughbred)



 Current beta is 3.51.4 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Memory leak in the last version, I found it! :)))

2005-07-16 Thread -=Curtis=-
On Saturday, July 16, 2005 at 2:27:26 PM [GMT -0500], Vili wrote:

 1. Check the mem. need of TB! in task manager. Lets say it is X MB.

 2.  Ctrl+N,  new mail. And just close it, dont do anything. Repeat it,
 for example 10 times.

 3.  Check the mem. need of TB! in task manager. It will be ca. X+3 MB.
 So, more email you send, more RAM will be used up...

I haven't been able to duplicate this problem. :(

-- 
  -= Curtis =-
The Bat! v3.51.4
System Specs: http://specs.aimlink.name
  -=-=-
Psychoceramics: The study of crackpots.



 Current beta is 3.51.4 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Memory leak in the last version, I found it! :)))

2005-07-16 Thread Michael Acklin
Saturday, July 16, 2005, 2:27:26 PM, (Internet Time - @852) you wrote:

Hello Vili,

 V Hello tbbeta,

V Ok, I found the cause of the memory leak. I know, that there must be
V a leak, I felt it :) ...:

V 1. Check the mem. need of TB! in task manager. Lets say it is X MB.

V 2.  Ctrl+N,  new mail. And just close it, dont do anything. Repeat it,
V for example 10 times.

V 3.  Check the mem. need of TB! in task manager. It will be ca. X+3 MB.
V So, more email you send, more RAM will be used up...

V I did not try it by sending, I guess, that would cause a leak, too.

V Please confirm it.

V PS.: No antivirus software, no plugin, WinXP Home SP1 :)), 512 MB RAM.
V TB! v3.51.4


Ok Vili, I see what you are talking about. I tired the CTL-N with in
the IMAP account and nothing really happened.

Then I switched over to a POP account and on the Process Explorer when
I hit CTL-N the Private Bytes History jumped to 54 mb from about 3
mb. I have attached a screen shot.

Maybe you can make some kind of sense out of this, as I am no
programer. :)

-- 

Best regards,
 Michael mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! Version 3.51.4

Windows XP Professional/5.1 Service Pack 2 (build 2600) on a Single/Athlon XP 
(Thoroughbred)attachment: Thebat_Memory.jpg

 Current beta is 3.51.4 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: Memory leak in the last version, I found it! :)))

2005-07-16 Thread Wayne Howard
Hello Roelof,

On Saturday, July 16, 2005, at 4:28:46 PM, you wrote
re: Memory leak in the last version, I found it! :))):

RO Well, I was using the AVG plug-in and BayesIt.

Not here. Memory leak is occurring without it. Just checked, TB is
using 63 MB. That's almost twice MS Access with a huge database loaded
into memory!

-- 
Cheers!
Wayne Howard

Using The Bat! version: 3.51.4
Directory Opus 8: The Explorer replacement and File Management solution for 
Windows
See the tutorial: Getting to know Directory Opus: 
www.pretentiousname.com/opus/index.html#introduction




 Current beta is 3.51.4 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Memory leak in the last version, I found it! :)))

2005-07-16 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Vili  everyone else,

on 16-Jul-2005 at 21:27 you (Vili) wrote:

 Ok, I found the cause of the memory leak. I know, that there must be
 a leak, I felt it :) ...:

[...]

 Please confirm it.

I can confirm this, too - however, when I minimize TB to the system tray
and then open it again, memory usage is back to normal again (28mb after
starting TB, 37mb after open  closing about 20 new message windows, 10mb
right now).

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)

I am going to record the facts for the information of God. He knows
the facts, but he does not know this version of the facts. -- Leo
Szilard



 Current beta is 3.51.4 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Memory leak when opening editor

2004-10-14 Thread Marcus Ohlström

On Wednesday, May 26, 2004, 10:49, Marcus Ohlström wrote:

 When opening MidroEd, regardless if I'm creating a new mail or answering
 an old, TB! leaks memory. At least 3KB of memory is allocated and not
 returned when closing the editor (it doesn't matter if I close it by
 sending the email or by cancelling it).

 Since I'm still on a very old beta, I would appreciate confirmations
 from users with current betas. I'll add a BT item as soon as someone has
 confirmed the memory leak.

This is even worse now, according to my Task Manager, TB!'s memory usage
goes up between 5-7MB each time I open the MicroEd. In addition, 5-7MB
of virtual memory is reported as lost too.

Any confirmations or comments before I add to the BT?

-- 
Regards,
Marcus Ohlström

Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4
PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc






 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Memory leak when opening editor

2004-10-14 Thread Marcus Ohlström

On Thursday, October 14, 2004, 16:01, Marcus Ohlström wrote:

 This is even worse now, according to my Task Manager, TB!'s memory
 usage goes up between 5-7MB each time I open the MicroEd. In addition,
 5-7MB of virtual memory is reported as lost too.

When trying after sending the mail, I could not reproduce it myself, not
even after a restart of TB!. Strange.

-- 
Regards,
Marcus Ohlström

Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4
PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc






 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Memory leak?

2001-12-06 Thread Peter Palmreuther

Hello Dierk,

On 6  Dec 2001 at 10:47:57 you wrote (at least in part):

 I use it all the time (for testing!!! I don't need true type fonts
 *g*)

DH You surely do mean variable pitch fonts? If you really don't need
DH TrueType (which, BTW, is a trademark) you are either not on Windows or
DH use Adobe's TypeManager with Type1 fonts. Which wouldn't be a good
DH alternative to TrueType.

OK, I was incorrect / explained not completely.
What I wanted to say is I'm really happy TB! displaying my mails with
a fixed font. With 'True Type' (regardless if this is a trademark or
not) I wanted to name the 'not fixed fonts' as they're often called
this in common. If you have a look into your systems font folder
you'll find at least two types of font files:
*.FON which are the fixed font files, and
*.TTF which are by Windows(TM) itself called 'TrueType Font file'.
So may the 'variable pitch fonts' be 'True Type' or not, for e-mail
reading and writing I'm happy about every letter having the same with
or pitch, call it as you like :-)
-- 
Regards
Peter Palmreuthermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Bat! v1.54 Beta/15 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2)

She's dead, Jim, but the body's still warm. Flip you for it.


-- 
_
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Beta: 1.54 beta/15
Wish List  : http://wish.thebat.dutaint.com




Re: Memory leak?

2001-12-06 Thread Dierk Haasis

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Peter!

On 6  Dec 2001 at 09:15:13 you wrote:

 No, but this may be due to the fact I'm running W2K with it's much
 improved memory handling.

You are right, from the last discussion on memory leakage (concerning
the new RTV) I remember that this problem is due to Win9x. TB! is
being developed, I've been told, on W2K.

 I use it all the time (for testing!!! I don't need true type fonts
 *g*)

You surely do mean variable pitch fonts? If you really don't need
TrueType (which, BTW, is a trademark) you are either not on Windows or
use Adobe's TypeManager with Type1 fonts. Which wouldn't be a good
alternative to TrueType.



- --
Dierk Haasis
http://www.Write4U.de
http://Interest.Write4U.de/pongo

PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys

The Bat 1.54 Beta/15 on Windows 95 4.0 67306684 C

History would be an excellent thing if only it were true. (Leo
Tolstoi)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt
Comment: Privacy is the core element to Freedom!

iQA/AwUBPA8wv/To1oA8g8dLEQKujACg07LgNSGnu0Ri+pPT5CqhbUaqJOoAn18m
Yhqr13Vx85XYM9kBGdRc6oy4
=Gs4T
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
_
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Beta: 1.54 beta/15
Wish List  : http://wish.thebat.dutaint.com




Re[2]: OT: E-mailaholics Anonymous (EmA) - was Re: Memory leak or what?

1999-12-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez

Hello Ali,

Wednesday, December 08, 1999, 4:34:33 PM GMT+0800, Ali Martin wrote:

AM You know, I was thinking of a questionnaire along those lines. You are
AM indeed a worthy member and we will accept you graciously. :) But
AM remember, we seek no remedy for our apparent infirmity.

AM Do you feel compelled to check for mail as soon as you wake up each
AM morning?

Yes.

AM Do you check your mail more than 15 times per day on a regular basis
AM and do you get jittery and restless if you don't get to fill your
AM daily check quota?

Yes.

AM Do you feel depressed or restless when your e-mail volume gets low and
AM furthermore, do you fiddle with your e-mail program when
AM disappointingly no mail is awaiting you when you check for it?

Yes. And start checking every few seconds. sigh

AM Do you find yourself sneaking away from your loved ones to check mail?

Yes.

AM If your answer is yes to one or more of those above questions then you
AM should seriously consider enrolling as a member.

Thanks.

-- 

Ciao,
Thomas.

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.38 under Chinese Windows 98
4.10 Build 1998   with a Pentium II/350 MHz.



-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--





Re: OT: E-mailaholics Anonymous (EmA) - was Re: Memory leak or what?

1999-12-08 Thread Mark Aston

Hi Ali,

Wednesday, December 08, 1999, 8:34:33 AM, you wrote:

AM Do you feel depressed or restless when your e-mail volume gets low and
AM furthermore, do you fiddle with your e-mail program when
AM disappointingly no mail is awaiting you when you check for it?

ROFL

If  you  are  really  desperate  you  can  export some of your mail to
various  other  clients and see if you can import it back, at least it
*looks* like you have some new mail then:-)

-- 
Best regards,
 Mark  

Using The Bat! 1.38
under Windows 98 4 10 Build 1998

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--