Re: What is Content-Type: text/html, and Body parts are not necessary attachments (was: Address book weirdness)

2018-08-04 Thread Ira
Hello Marck, Saturday, August 4, 2018, 2:44:58 AM, you wrote: > I wouldn't like to see TB functionality compromised by smoothing out > that interface element at the expense of the ability to save message > parts externally in the correct content-type file type. > Perhaps a switchable

Re: What is Content-Type: text/html, and Body parts are not necessary attachments (was: Address book weirdness)

2018-08-04 Thread Lüko Willms
Guten Tag, Marck Pearlstone, am Samstag, 4. August 2018 um 11:44 schrieben Sie: > In which case, I can see and sympathise with the point Ira made that > an email consisting only of an HTML part shouldn't be showing as an > attachment. First, I had no chance of seeing a message with a

Re: What is Content-Type: text/html, and Body parts are not necessary attachments (was: Address book weirdness)

2018-08-04 Thread Marck Pearlstone
On 04 August 2018 at 10:25 Lüko Willms wrote and made these points LW> please excuse me to break in again, but here a correction is called for: ... >> Because it's not the message. The only way of using HTML for email is >> to make it an attachment. It's how email works. LW>This is