In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
JW I doubt this. Had they known it, they would have fixed it. It turns
out to be an elusive bug, as some encounter it and others don't.
JW Thomas, perhaps it is just a bug. But even if it was just a bug,
JW why did RL lose sight of their goal to
Good day, Natasha.
NVP ICAM. You're free to choose whichever level of TB suits your
NVP current needs. To
NVP help you make this decision, RL posts, on a daily basis,
NVP all their fixes at
NVP http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/daily.txt
NVP and in addition
NVP posts
Good day beta list members,
Monday, July 18, 2005, 9:58:56 AM, you wrote:
On 7/18/05, Natasha V Pearce wrote:
been taken out of context, but if you feel I've misquoted you and/or
quoted
them in a misleading or otherwise inappropriate manner, please feel free
to
send down the
On 7/18/05, Chris Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you sure you are cut out for testing software?
Testing software? Yes. Testing a RitLabs email client? I am not sure
any longer... for the reasons stated in my initial message on this
thread.
The simple fact is that I cannot afford to have
Hello Jay,
Monday, July 18, 2005, 11:58:56, you wrote:
With an introduction like that - and with the
BayesIt problem still unresolved - who would imagine that we would be
embarking on an entirely new series of beta (pardon, me, alpha)
testing of a very risky nature?
Do you mean the BayesIt isn't
On 7/18/05, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
Monday, July 18, 2005, 11:58:56, you wrote:
With an introduction like that - and with the
BayesIt problem still unresolved - who would imagine that we would be
embarking on an entirely new series of beta (pardon, me, alpha)
testing of a very risky nature?
6 matches
Mail list logo
