Re: Authenticode (Digital Signatures) for plugins

2007-09-05 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Wednesday, September 5, 2007, George M. Menegakis wrote: > I concur. Development of freeware plugins faces imminent danger if developers > have to pay. And there is more. Even if a developer choses to pay from his > pocket, his plugin may uses a third party dll that is not signed! You s

Re: Authenticode (Digital Signatures) for plugins

2007-09-05 Thread George M. Menegakis
Hello Marek, Wednesday, September 5, 2007, 11:11:30 AM, you wrote: >>I know that certificates are expensive, but it worth its price. > but almost all plugins are free, why should developers pay for certificate > then? I concur. Development of freeware plugins faces imminent danger if developers

Re: Authenticode (Digital Signatures) for plugins

2007-09-05 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Wednesday, September 5, 2007, Maxim Masiutin wrote: >>>as Vitaly told me, certificate costs 200$ per year, if is this correct, do >>>You expect, developers will implement it? > I know that certificates are expensive, but it worth its price. but almost all plugins are free, why should