Hi there!
On 2 Nov 99, at 0:59, Christopher J. Trybowski wrote
about "Re: OT: Computer Philosophy (was: R":
Before the crash he had 1 primary and 1 extended partition, 2
logicals on the latter. After the crash, he had only *one* (primary)
partition. The rest of the partitions
hallo !
if the "check mail for all" function is supposed to check all accounts
with one click it doesn't work here. it just checks 4 of my current 8
accounts in the bat...
what can i do?
--
PAT
vcard/LDAP/PGP public key: http://dresden-online.com/~perler/identity.html
PGP fingerprint: DAC6
hallo Ralf!
on Wednesday, November 03, 1999, 1:50:20 PM, you wrote:
RB Hi Patrick,
RB you wrote on Wednesday, November 03, 1999, 13:33:23:
if the "check mail for all" function is supposed to check all accounts
with one click it doesn't work here. it just checks 4 of my current 8
accounts
On 02 November 1999 at 21:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] told the list:
MH I have returned to The Bat! and like it enough this time around to
MH have purchased the edu licence :-)
:-)
MH However, I have noticed during the past 4 days, that I have had to
MH repair 4 different folders. I had a similar
Wednesday, November 03, 1999
Hello Alexander,
Wednesday, Wednesday, November 03, 1999, you wrote:
Alexander Hi there!
Alexander On 2 Nov 99, at 0:59, Christopher J. Trybowski wrote
Alexander about "Re: OT: Computer Philosophy (was: R":
Before the crash he had 1 primary and 1
Hi,
this option is unchecked in all accounts. as i just realize, the
bat doesn't check just 4 of 8 accounts, it checks sometimes 4,
sometimes 1, sometimes 3 acccounts with out a system...
Using "check all Alt-F2" in the drop down from the blue "check
emails" button checks all 5
hallo Claudius!
on Wednesday, November 03, 1999, 3:37:26 PM, you wrote:
CR Hi,
this option is unchecked in all accounts. as i just realize, the
bat doesn't check just 4 of 8 accounts, it checks sometimes 4,
sometimes 1, sometimes 3 acccounts with out a system...
CR Using "check all
in which order get the rules in the filtering office applied to a
message. the reason i ask is, that in pmmail98 i filtered every mail
and the last rule was "move to folder SPAM". in the bat this seems not
to work...
From my experience, the filters are processed in the order that they're
Hi all,
On Wednesday, November 03, 1999, 10:14:04 AM (-5 GMT), Patrick scribbled:
in which order get the rules in the filtering office applied to a
message. the reason i ask is, that in pmmail98 i filtered every mail
and the last rule was "move to folder SPAM". in the bat this seems not
to
Monday, November 01, 1999, 11:28:35 AM, Ali wrote:
Many OSS programmers chimed in at that point to say that they get paid to
develop OSS. That's the funding I'm speaking about. If this type of funding
doesn't in anyway apply to GNOME and KDE development, then I stand
corrected.
The
hallo Ali!
on Wednesday, November 03, 1999, 4:35:47 PM, you wrote:
AM Hi all,
AM On Wednesday, November 03, 1999, 10:14:04 AM (-5 GMT), Patrick scribbled:
in which order get the rules in the filtering office applied to a
message. the reason i ask is, that in pmmail98 i filtered every mail
Wednesday, November 03, 1999, 9:06:50 AM, Kevin wrote:
They chose to use it, didn't they?
I honestly don't know very many people who have a choice of what OS they
use in their jobs.
I honestly don't know of very many IT managers that don't have a choice.
It is still a (l)user's
Hi,
Exactly. It's windows. It's therefore not the users fault when that
frustrating crash occurs. :)
They chose to use it, didn't they?
I honestly don't know very many people who have a choice of what OS they
use in their jobs.
OK, so 99.9% of the people don't have a choice. And yes
Wednesday, November 03, 1999, 9:33:41 AM, Kevin wrote:
OK, so 99.9% of the people don't have a choice.
Isn't that a little high given the amount of home PCs and number of
businesses that do allow users to chose?
And yes it does become a problem FOR them. But I think the point was that it
Hi,
Wednesday, November 03, 1999, 9:33:41 AM, Kevin wrote:
OK, so 99.9% of the people don't have a choice.
Isn't that a little high given the amount of home PCs and number of
businesses that do allow users to chose?
No, I don't think so. In businesses not very many allow you to chose
Hi Marck,
Wednesday, November 03, 1999, 2:30:45 PM, you wrote:
MDP Well, I have near 37000 messages spread over 160+ folders and have
MDP only ever had problems like those you describe when I have "messed
MDP about" with the folder structure in both TB and Windows Explorer in a
MDP
Wednesday, November 03, 1999, 12:11:59 PM, Kevin wrote:
Actually, it would be better to have a variety. Makes viruses kind of
hard to propagate, doesn't it?
Probably, but I wouldn't make my choice of OS at home based on that. :-)
No, but it is about as valid a reason as any other.
Hi,
Probably, but I wouldn't make my choice of OS at home based on
that. :-)
No, but it is about as valid a reason as any other. IE... not all
that valid.
No, not as valid a reason as "I don't want to work in two different
word processors, I want to be able to transfer stuff from work to
Hello all,
I`m trying to use REGEXP macro, but I can`t get a result...
Someone can write a %REGEXPTEXT= macro that quote a message
until myText?
I`ve tryed with something like "/s.*mytext" but it seems doesn`t
work.
Someone in it.comp.perl says to me to use
Wednesday, November 03, 1999, 3:52:51 PM, Kevin wrote:
No, not as valid a reason as "I don't want to work in two different
word processors, I want to be able to transfer stuff from work to
home", etc. So it's not as valid a reason as any others.
Those are no more valid at all when you
*I am forced to invoke the DEAD HORSE rule on this topic.*
Okay - I have to wield the big stick. This OT conversation has been
fascinating but I am going to have to ask Kevin and Steve to carry it
on off-list (should they wish to continue) and anyone else thinking of
commenting on recent
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Thursday, November 04, 1999, Giamma wrote about
%REGEXP macro:
G Hello all,
G I`m trying to use REGEXP macro, but I can`t get a result...
G Someone can write a %REGEXPTEXT= macro that quote a message
G until myText?
G I`ve tryed with
22 matches
Mail list logo
