Re: Duplicate Message Search

Hi On Monday 6 December 2004 at 5:47:18 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote: AMG Curious as to how TB! does its duplicate message AMG search. IIRC on Message-ID A then it isn't working fully, or there are some other criteria in play. [...] A (also explains why the sent folder never found any

Re: Gmail POP settings

Hi On Sunday 5 December 2004 at 3:17:11 PM, Tony Boom wrote: M Each time I send or receive, I get a dialog box about the M server not supplying a root certificate and I have to press M OK to continue. Sorry my old Son but I can't help you with that. I've never had that happen so I wouldn't

Re: Gmail POP settings

Hi On Sunday 5 December 2004 at 12:36:55 PM, Nav wrote: I still can't get TheBat! to work with G-Mail. The authentication suceeds, but after that connection hangs forever. [...] Could there be some bug in TheBat! See https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3979 -- Best regards, MFPA

Re: Gmail POP settings

Hi On Monday 6 December 2004 at 11:23:23 AM, MFPA wrote: That probably means you have a certificate for Thawte Server CA in your address book. I have lots of entries in mine but for each one, the certificate tab is empty. :-( I know there used to be certificates there but restoring the

Trusted Root CA address book - most entries have no certificates

Hi I have 104 entries in my Trusted Root CA address book but only 14 of them have certificates. Is this normal? -- Best regards, MFPA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1

Re: Duplicate Message Search

MFPA [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: According to TB! v3 help file:- Duplicates are detected by the following combination of message attributes: Message ID, Sender and date of creation. Further investigation would lead to the following change: Duplicates are detected by the following

Re: Duplicate Message Search

After testing on a large volume of mail... That work around isn't perfect, and does still misses some of the dupes that now have everything the same. Oh, well. -- Andrew Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:

Re: File Location, Permission, Spell Checker, etc.

Wed, 1 Dec 2004 18:22:08 -0500 (6:22 PM EST here) Chris wrote: Dan Grunberg @ 2004-Dec-1 10:30:19 AM File Location, Permission, Spell Checker, etc. mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] If the DEFAULT location for The Bat!'s files became CSIDL_APPDATA\Rit Labs\The Bat!\ or some variant thereof, these

Thousands of .MSG files?

This is probably easy to fix, but I've not been able to locate a setting for it anywhere... Sometime before I upgraded to tb3.01 (but while I was trying out beta versions of tb2.xx) I started getting large numbers of .MSG files in my 'attachments' folder. (A) Can I safely delete these without

Re: Thousands of .MSG files?

Steven P Valliere [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If no one's noticed, explorer isn't very fast when there are 20,000+ files in a folder... (and before you ask, yes, I get far, far too much SPAM). I'll let others answer the rest, but do you not have checked Delete Attached Messages when a

Attachments in body or special directory?

Can anyone summarise the advantages and disadvantages of storing attachments in message bodies or in special folder? -- Marten Gallagher Annery Kiln Web Design www.annerykiln.co.uk Using The Bat! 3.0.1.33 with POPFile 0.22.1 on Windows XP 5.1

Very slow opening attachments and opening directory to 'save to..'

TB seems v slow at the moment in opening attachments and in opening the browse window for saving attachments. I have a local network so I can understand that causing a slight delay finding network drives etc but it can take up to three minutes to display the browse directory, and now it is

Re: Attachments in body or special directory?

Dear Marten, @6-Dec-2004, 20:46 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [MG] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: MG Can anyone summarise the advantages and disadvantages of MG storing attachments in message bodies or in special folder? In the message body, folder / entire message integrity is far easier to maintain.