On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:59:50 +0100, Roelof Otten wrote:
You're experiencing other problems than I did. 0.7.3 didn't work for
me and a clean install of 0.8.0 works.
Don't you just love computers!
I've since re-applied 0.8.0 now that I've got the dictionaries created.
I was having a look at
Hello all,
Friday, February 18, 2005, Claude Renaud wrote:
In the tools menus we can find a wizards submenus, what are
they exactly ?
There is a download option in the wizards submenu but in the related page
there is no wizards to download ?
So when are they planned ?
They are not
Hello all,
Friday, February 18, 2005, Claude Renaud wrote:
As Marek said previously, Tb professional will replace Secure
Bat! nextly.
Until now I used Secure Bat! with Ikey.
Apparently The Bat! pro does not support ikeys currently.
development version tested in TBBETA supports iKey
Hi Claude,
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, at 07:19:48 [GMT+0100] (which was 17:19:48 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:
In the tools menus we can find a wizards submenus, what are
they exactly ?
Exactly where is this? Not in mu version 3.0.1.33 there isn't
--
John Phillips, Sydney,
Dear John,
@18-Feb-2005, 20:37 +1100 (18-Feb 09:37 UK time) John Phillips [JP] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Claude:
In the tools menus we can find a wizards submenus, what are
they exactly ?
JP Exactly where is this? Not in mu version 3.0.1.33 there isn't
Where? In the Beta.
Hello Darrin,
A reminder of what Darrin Rich on TBUDL typed on:
17 February 2005 at 02:11:07 GMT +0100
DR Not to knock down TB, but have you tried the email software by Time
DR Choas? Its called ExpressPlus and suppose to work perfectly with the
DR pim software.
I bought the whole TC
Hello Darrin,
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:42:49 -0800 GMT (18/02/2005, 05:42 +0700 GMT),
Darrin Rich wrote:
DR The company I host with sent me an email about spamalizer. Its a
DR spam filtering service they offer now. Anyone here ever tried server
DR side spam filtering before.
I am using
Hello Thomas,
Friday, February 18, 2005, 5:57:02 AM, you wrote:
T I am using server-side spam filtering, but it will give me a list of
T the mails identified as spam once a day. I can still go into the
T website and reclassify them as not spam if I want to. That's a
T feature of GMX.
T I
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 at 06:46:02 -0800, Darrin Rich wrote:
T I wouldn't trust a server-side spam filter that just deletes mails it
T thinks is spam. I have never used spamalizer myself. Make sure you
T have control, or you'll lose mails.
DR It seems like it should work well according to the link
I just got an email about Bat Voyager with a link the ritlabs website but there
is nothing there apart from a news item saying the same as the email.
Am I missing something?
--
Marten Gallagher
Annery Kiln Web Design
www.annerykiln.co.uk
Using The Bat! 3.0.1.33
with POPFile 0.22.1
on Windows
Hello all,
As many of you know, blaming The Bat! for spam is not an new issue. Look
what I got yesterday:
MDaemon has indentified your message as spam. It will not be delivered.
From : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject : [***SPAM*** Score/Req: 06.50/05.00]
I just got an email about Bat Voyager with a link the ritlabs website but
there is nothing there apart from a news item saying the same as the
email.
Am I missing something?
In broken, incomplete, English too... I was quite 'ammused'. :) While I
know the majority of the software company
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello All,
Friday, February 18, 2005, 9:48:12 AM, MAU wrote:
M As many of you know, blaming The Bat! for spam is not an new issue. Look
M what I got yesterday:
MDaemon has indentified your message as spam. It will not be delivered.
From : [EMAIL
Hello MAU everyone else,
on 18-Feb-2005 at 16:48 you (MAU) wrote:
Start SpamAssassin results 6.50 points, 5 required; * 3.0 -- Message
has been marked by MDaemon's Spam Blocker * 3.5 -- Forged mail pretending to
be from The Bat! End of SpamAssassin results
: Message contains
MAU @ 2005-Feb-18 10:48:12 AM
Pretending to use The Bat! mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As many of you know, blaming The Bat! for spam is not an new issue. Look
what I got yesterday:
SNIP
Start SpamAssassin results 6.50 points, 5 required; * 3.0 -- Message
has been marked by MDaemon's Spam
Hello Marc,
What's the rest of the header look like? I didn't see anything
identifying MUA or MTA in the section you quoted.
What I quoted is the error message I received, not the headers.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10
Winamp Playing:
Hello Alexander,
I told them that TheBat is not a forged MUA, but I have little hope that it
will actually change anything, this topic has been brought up often enough
and nothing has changed ever since.
Yes, it is a difficult battle. What I did was to let the recipients know
that their
Hello Chris,
You can turn off the X-Mailer header.
Options - Preferences = General - UNCHECK Use X-Mailer header in
messages
Yes, I know. But I don't want to hide the fact that I am using The Bat!.
I _am_ proud of using TB.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using
Hello Chris everyone else,
on 18-Feb-2005 at 17:59 you (Chris) wrote:
Because of its macros and templateing system, The Bat! has been
considered a spam tool by some anti-spam companies.
AFAIK there once was a bulk email software that would create fake X-Mailer
headers. But, in that software
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Fri, 18 Feb 2005,
@ @ at 18:21:49 +0100, when MAU wrote:
I don't want to hide the fact that I am using The Bat!. I _am_ proud
of using TB.
We have even TB flag(s). (-:
So we can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Thu, 17 Feb 2005,
@ @ at 21:43:32 +0100, when Milan Gurjanov wrote:
Hello, Mico! Thursday, February 17, 2005. 21:40:09
Ah, who would say! My name in a proper
Hi MAU,
on Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:21:49 +0100GMT, you wrote:
You can turn off the X-Mailer header.
Options - Preferences = General - UNCHECK Use X-Mailer header in
messages
M Yes, I know. But I don't want to hide the fact that I am using The Bat!.
You shouldn't.
M I _am_ proud of using
Hey All,
I've got a little problem... Using TB! along with GnuPG, it messes
up my sig delimter so that it's only -- instead of --space. Any
way to fix that?
--
Best regards,
David
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
TWIMC
begin quote
We are pleased to announce the availability of a the second release
candidate for the forthcoming 1.4.1 version of GnuPG:
ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/alpha/gnupg/gnupg-1.4.1rc2.tar.bz2 (2.7M)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi David,
on Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:54:20 -0500GMT, you wrote:
DC I've got a little problem... Using TB! along with GnuPG, it messes
DC up my sig delimter so that it's only -- instead of --space. Any
DC way to fix that?
Not that I know of.
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 at 20:14:40 +0100, Peter Meyns wrote:
PM Hi David,
PM on Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:54:20 -0500GMT, you wrote:
DC I've got a little problem... Using TB! along with GnuPG, it messes
DC up my sig delimter so that it's only -- instead of --space. Any
DC way to fix that?
PM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 20:14:40 +0100GMT (18-2-2005, 20:14 +0100, where I
live), Peter Meyns wrote:
PM on Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:54:20 -0500GMT, you wrote:
DC I've got a little problem... Using TB! along with GnuPG, it messes
DC up my sig delimter
Hi David,
on Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:31:58 -0500GMT, you wrote:
DC I've got a little problem... Using TB! along with GnuPG, it messes
DC up my sig delimter so that it's only -- instead of --space. Any
DC way to fix that?
PM Not that I know of. TB! recognizes sig delimiters defected by its
I just got an email about Bat Voyager with a link the ritlabs website but
there is nothing there apart from ...
... Am I missing something?
JA I don't think you missed anything, I couldn't find much else about
JA the software except what was already included in the email.
JA Looks like they're
Hello Peter Meyns everyone else,
on 18-Feb-2005 at 20:47 you (Peter Meyns) wrote:
Let's see how it behaves regarding the sig delimiter.
Much better if you ask me, because its PGP/MIME instead of inline signing,
and the sig delimiter is also totally normal. :-)
--
Best regards,
Alexander
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 at 20:50:31 +0100, Henk de Bruijn wrote:
HdB live), Peter Meyns wrote:
PM on Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:54:20 -0500GMT, you wrote:
DC I've got a little problem... Using TB! along with GnuPG, it messes
DC up my sig delimter so that it's only -- instead of --space. Any
DC
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 at 21:02:16 +0100, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
ASK on 18-Feb-2005 at 20:47 you (Peter Meyns) wrote:
Let's see how it behaves regarding the sig delimiter.
ASK Much better if you ask me, because its PGP/MIME instead of inline signing,
ASK and the sig delimiter is also totally
Hi David Calvarese,
On 18/02/2005 03:11 PM, you wrote:
I suppose I'll have to up and buy it then. I was hoping to avoid
having to do that.Ummm... What exactly does it do different
anyway?
TB! can generate PGP/MIME signatures using GnuPG. You don't need to get
PGP v8 for that.
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:10:37 -0500GMT (18-2-2005, 21:10 +0100, where I
live), David Calvarese wrote:
DC On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 at 20:50:31 +0100, Henk de Bruijn wrote:
HdB live), Peter Meyns wrote:
PM Not that I know of. TB! recognizes sig delimiters defected by its own
PM implementation, but not
Hello David Calvarese everyone else,
on 18-Feb-2005 at 20:31 you (David Calvarese) wrote:
Hrm... Would PGP V8 be any better for that? I wouldn't object to
buying it if I had to.
Buy? Do you need to use it commercially? If not:
http://www.pgp.com/downloads/freeware/index.html
--
Best
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 at 21:54:32 +0100, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
ASK on 18-Feb-2005 at 20:31 you (David Calvarese) wrote:
Hrm... Would PGP V8 be any better for that? I wouldn't object to
buying it if I had to.
ASK Buy? Do you need to use it commercially? If not:
ASK
On Sat 19 February 2005, 4:21:49 +1000, Mau wrote:
Yes, I know. But I don't want to hide the fact that I am using The Bat!.
I _am_ proud of using TB.
Well, so am I. But to prevent possible problems such as you encounter, I
disguise my mailer slightly - see my X-mailer header. Actually, I use
Saturday, February 19, 2005, 8:53:01 AM, Marten wrote:
Not the first time I did not receive an announcement email from
RitLabs.
MG I must have got yours then - I got it twice!
Same here, but that has been normal for recent emails from RIT.
Best vapourware I've seen in ages.
--
Cheers,
On Friday, February 18, 2005, 11:45:37, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Interesting. This SpamAssassin must really be badly maintained.
Actually, it's pretty well maintained. They just have difficulties with
adjusting to new TB versions but _will_ do their best to do so.
Post a bug report at
39 matches
Mail list logo
