On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 18:07:21 +, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
Attachments are allowed but only up to a list maximum of 25kb. TBBETA
has a higher ceiling of 40kb.
Thanks Marck, I stand corrected, and attached is my blacklist of RegEx
filters for Bayesit.
Feel free to try at your own risk!!
--
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 13:16:45 +0100, Dick H wrote:
Hello Barry,
On Monday, February 21, 2005 at 09:01:40 GMT + (which was 10:01:40
where I live), Barry wrote and made these valuable points on the
subject of More observation on Bayesit!:
Hi
Well I'm still persevering!
I've now
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:25:18 -0500, Roman Katzer wrote:
Furthermore: I never got BayesIt to work. The fact that there doesn't seem
to be documentation doesn't help. Even when the German magazine c't (highly
respected) tested several mail programs and their spam filtering
capabilities they
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:37:27 +, Barry wrote:
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 18:07:21 +, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
Attachments are allowed but only up to a list maximum of 25kb. TBBETA
has a higher ceiling of 40kb.
Thanks Marck, I stand corrected, and attached is my blacklist of RegEx
Hi @ll,
Could someone please give me a hint on how to work this out?
I want to set up filtering for log messages where sender and subject
contain similar strings, and body text contains (non-) capitalized
lowercase phrases like scan dropped and Attack Dropped.
The use of [] and | isn't all that
Dear Cory,
@22-Feb-2005, 11:16 +0100 (22-Feb 10:16 UK time) Cory [C] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
C Could someone please give me a hint on how to work this out?
I can try ... although you don't say which version you are using.
C I want to set up filtering for log messages where sender and
C
Hello Mic,
Monday, February 21, 2005, 6:24:22 PM, you wrote:
MC At 18:04 [GMT-0500] on Monday February 21 (actual time - 7:04am on Tuesday
in
MC Perth, Western Australia), you wrote:
Hi Mic,
Thanks for the info. Does that mean the discussion group doesn't deal
with questions involving
At 17:26 [GMT-0500] on Tuesday February 22 (actual time - 6:26am on Wednesday in
Perth, Western Australia), you wrote:
Nick Thanks for the info. Does that mean the discussion group doesn't deal
Nick with questions involving earlier versions of TB!?
Not necessarily, but it does narrow the pool
Hi
On Tuesday 22 February 2005 at 10:26:34 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Nick OHare wrote:
Does that mean the discussion group doesn't deal with questions
involving earlier versions of TB!?
As version 3 has a new filter system, potential helpers may be unable
to test their advice before
Hello Nick,
Tuesday, February 22, 2005, 11:26:34 PM, you wrote:
Does that mean the discussion group doesn't deal
with questions involving earlier versions of TB!?
Not at all. There are even some still around who use v2, take me for
example. But you are using an old version even in terms of
10 matches
Mail list logo
