Re[5]: RTF

2002-10-30 Thread Franois PASCAL
Bonjour Barry2, B HTML has been proven over and over to be inherently insecure so who's to say that an B exploit couldn't be found to attack TB! through HTML ?? There is a big misunderstanding about HTML and security. HTML can *NOT* be insecure. HTML is a set of hierarchicaly ordered tags. These

Re[7]: RTF

2002-10-30 Thread Franois PASCAL
Bonjour Barry2, Le mercredi 30 octobre 2002 à 20:17:47, vous écriviez : B Hello François, B I understand your point, but it's the HTML code that activates the B javascript / ActiveX etc etc ... and that's where the insecurity lies. No, it is not the HTML code that activates the javascrip /

Re[2]: Outlook import

2002-10-29 Thread Franois PASCAL
Bonjour Paul, PC I can confirm that importing messages from OL IS a problem. Have you tried the freeware called Dawn (currently in version 5.0) ? It is designed to translate e-mails from a format to another. Tried it myself in another context (Netscape to Pegassus as far as I remember) and was

Re[2]: RTF

2002-10-29 Thread Franois PASCAL
Bonjour Jonathan, May I enter this thread just to mention that : * HTML is not primarily a cosmetic format, but a semantic format : it is a subset of XML and thus carry inherent qualities that goes far above rtf. * rtf itself is a thing of the past, since M$ itself is switching to XML * to

Re[2]: RTF

2002-10-29 Thread Franois PASCAL
Bonjour Roelof, Le mardi 29 octobre 2002 à 22:58:47, vous écriviez : RO Hallo François, RO On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 22:14:19 +0100GMT (29-10-02, 22:14 +0100GMT, where RO I live), you wrote: FP * rtf itself is a thing of the past, since M$ itself is switching FP to XML RO Why are you both bashing

Re[2]: RTF

2002-10-29 Thread Franois PASCAL
Bonjour Roelof, Le mardi 29 octobre 2002 à 22:58:47, vous écriviez : RO Hallo François, RO On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 22:14:19 +0100GMT (29-10-02, 22:14 +0100GMT, where RO I live), you wrote: FP * rtf itself is a thing of the past, since M$ itself is switching FP to XML RO Why are you both bashing