Re[2]: Firewalls that don't interfere with TB. Was: Question

2002-07-29 Thread Michael Thompson
Hello Lynn, Monday, July 29, 2002, 9:01:43 PM, you wrote: LT Monday, July 29, 2002, 12:01:25 PM, you wrote: LT On the subject of firewalls, I'm using the Wingate (v4.x) LT firewall (which doesn't interfere with TB), but I have no LT clue how reliable it is. LT Anybody know? I don't know any

Re: Xray and ADR

2002-07-27 Thread Michael Thompson
Hello People. Quick question Why does the Bat! insist on downloading every message that you alreaady have when you change the Keep Messages on server option? Does the Bat not keep a list of all downloaded messages? Would it not make more sense just to delete them if they dont fit the Keep On

Re[2]: External Exception 80000003

2002-07-27 Thread Michael Thompson
Hello Sergey, Saturday, July 27, 2002, 12:40:40 PM, you wrote: SU Dear Holger, SU Saturday, July 27, 2002, 1:24:03 PM, you wrote: HL Bat 1.60q on Windows XP Prof HL I have no problem when pasting an adress or when entering an adress HL i've used before. I have also no problem when mailing

Re[2]: Xray and ADR

2002-07-27 Thread Michael Thompson
Hello Clive, Saturday, July 27, 2002, 4:19:43 PM, you wrote: CT 27 July 2002, 14:58, you wrote: MT Why does the Bat! insist on downloading every message that you MT alreaady have when you change the Keep Messages on server option? CT Why have you replied to my message when it's obvious even

Re[2]: Need help with a Klez filter!

2002-07-27 Thread Michael Thompson
Hello Angel, Saturday, July 27, 2002, 8:04:54 PM, you wrote: A On Saturday, July 27, 2002 at 9:40:05 AM , Kim scibbled: S Only after the message is stored in a folder {INBOX} will S a filter be used. NAV catches it and quarantines it as it is supposed to. KGH What I _would_ like is that they

Access Violations

2002-07-22 Thread Michael Thompson
Hello People, When I click on the Small down arrow in a message composition window I get a Access Violation Error twice.. (in Comctl32.dll) I have only just reinstalled the BAT! and have never had this before. The Options state that this list is populated by Input History but I have tried

Re[2]: Access Violations

2002-07-22 Thread Michael Thompson
Hello Jonathan, Tuesday, July 23, 2002, 5:37:11 AM, you wrote: JA Is it just a particular version? I'm using TB! 1.60(c I believe), and JA have not had a problem like this. In fact, not had that many problems JA at all. The only one that springs to mind is sometimes if you run a JA purge

Re[2]: AVG didn't catch

2002-07-17 Thread Michael Thompson
Hello Marck, Wednesday, July 17, 2002, 4:56:02 AM, you wrote : MDP We just said that in a long thread discussing the plug-in thesis. The MDP middle man approach slows down *all* mail while plug-ins are only MDP called when there is an attachment worth looking at. MDP Please read the recent

Re[2]: OT: Sharing after marriage

2002-07-17 Thread Michael Thompson
Hello Sudip, Wednesday, July 17, 2002, 5:11:54 AM, you wrote : SP Will it convert NTFS to FAT32 without losing data? I think XP SP converts FAT32 to NTFS without having to format the drive , thereby SP maintaining data integrity. Yes, it is completly safe, (Version 5) And will not lose any

Re[2]: OT: Sharing after marriage

2002-07-17 Thread Michael Thompson
Hello Roelof, Wednesday, July 17, 2002, 8:36:21 AM, you wrote : RO No, but that's because NTFS stores things like ownership of RO directories and files and those are not implemented in FAT32, for the RO rest the answer is Yes. Yes, but if you dont considure this to be data then it aint

Re[4]: OT: Sharing after marriage (PGP Issues)

2002-07-17 Thread Michael Thompson
Hello Jonathan, Wednesday, July 17, 2002, 4:40:39 AM, you wrote : JA In what way? I uninstalled, and reinstalled two times versions (one was a JA different version, the other was because I missed a package) on WinXP only 3 JA weeks ago... not had any issues. PGP 7.5 was to add Windows XP

Re[2]: I hate HTML mail

2002-07-17 Thread Michael Thompson
Hello Markus, Wednesday, July 17, 2002, 10:16:34 AM, you wrote : MG This doesn't always work. I think it depends on the attachment storage MG option and on the Content Disposition MIME tag. I know that there are MG HTML messages that display fine (with images) within the bat but the MG images

Automatic backups?

2002-07-17 Thread Michael Thompson
Hello tbudl, Is there any way to automate the Backup procedure?? -- Best regards, Michael http://web.ukonline.co.uk/thompsonmike/ 'To see a world in a grain of sand And heaven in a wild flower To hold infinity in the palm of your hand And eternity in an hour'

Well off topics

2002-07-17 Thread Michael Thompson
Hello tbudl, I know this may not be the place for this, but I am really starting to get bugged by this. I am using WinXP Professional and every once in a while I am unable to delete some directorys, rename them etc. I get the Message that it may be in use by another process or user.

Re[2]: OT: Sharing after marriage

2002-07-16 Thread Michael Thompson
Hello Sudip, Wednesday, July 17, 2002, 2:05:03 AM, you wrote: SP Hi Thomas, SP On Wed, 17 Jul 2002 00:56:35 +0700 GMT (Jul 16, 23:41 my local time), SP you [TF] wrote: TF I have no idea whether it is possible to recover these when you go TF back to FAT32. SP AFAIK, you can convert FAT32 to

Re: AVG didn't catch

2002-07-16 Thread Michael Thompson
Hello Rick, Wednesday, July 17, 2002, 2:54:20 AM, you wrote: RR Has anyone else ever received the W32.Frethem.E@mm worm virus? I RR didn't run the exe but it slipped passed AVG with the RR decrypt-password.exe. I thought AVG was supposed to be pretty good. RR I'm surprised this high-profile

Re[2]: OT: Sharing after marriage

2002-07-16 Thread Michael Thompson
Hello Sudip, Wednesday, July 17, 2002, 2:11:50 AM, you wrote: SP Hi Thomas, SP On Wed, 17 Jul 2002 00:39:45 +0700 GMT (Jul 16, 23:24 my local time), SP you [TF] wrote: TF I think he is sharing TB with his wife. SP I wish Thomas but no, She uses Incredimail sigh TF How do you

Re[2]: AVG didn't catch

2002-07-16 Thread Michael Thompson
Hello Marck, Wednesday, July 17, 2002, 4:20:26 AM, you wrote: MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MDP Hash: SHA1 MDP Hi Rick, MDP @17 July 2002, 21:54 -0400 (02:54 UK time) Rick Reumann [RR] in MDP [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Bat List: RR Has anyone else ever

<    1   2