Re[2]: [OT) Discussion list netiquette [was Re: (No Subject)]

1999-11-21 Thread tracer
Monday, November 22, 1999 Hello Paula, Sunday, Sunday, November 21, 1999, you wrote: Paula> I thought Marck declared a Dead Horse here. Maybe a different horse??? We can start a farm... Best regards, tracer Using theBAT 1.38 Beta/2 mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTE: 1 MAILRUN PER DAY ON

Re: [OT) Discussion list netiquette [was Re: (No Subject)]

1999-11-21 Thread Steve Lamb
Sunday, November 21, 1999, 5:17:37 AM, Ali wrote: > There is an optimal balance that can be attained Steve and I don't > think it's as difficult as you make it out to be. Of course not, I've attained it. I'm waiting for everyone else to figure that out. -- Steve C. Lamb |

Re: [OT) Discussion list netiquette [was Re: (No Subject)]

1999-11-21 Thread Paula Ford
I thought Marck declared a Dead Horse here. -- Paula Ford The Bat! 1.35 (reg) Windows 95 4.0 Build 950 -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:

[OT) Discussion list netiquette [was Re: (No Subject)]

1999-11-21 Thread Ali Martin
Hi all, Steve Lamb wrote: > Society has gotten a little *too* polite and it is time for it to change. It would appear that you missed the whole point of the example. I used MS as an example to illustrate that human interaction is of prime importance and that it can't simply be cast aside

Re: [OT) Discussion list netiquette [was Re: (No Subject)]

1999-11-21 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Ali, On Sunday, November 21, 1999, 8:34:02 PM (GMT+0800), Ali Martin wrote: Ali>>> c) If someone makes a suggestion that is their own selfish desire I Ali>>> really don't think the developers at Ritlabs will suddenly implement Ali>>> it, especially on this very basis, unless it's a compell

[OT) Discussion list netiquette [was Re: (No Subject)]

1999-11-21 Thread Ali Martin
Hi all, tracer wrote: Ali>> You really didn't need to use my profession to get your point across. > I already made this comparison ( locally) many times. > In a way it has a lot in common, except that the computer cannot tell > why he doesnt feel good. And you have the interpreter (the owner)