On Saturday, August 31, 2002, 10:17:31 PM, ETM wrote:
E My current AV is notifying me when it receives Klez, etc., usually
E cleaning and restoring mail. Do I understand correctly that AVG
E does not have that capability?
AVG will notify you. The only thing it won't do is *certify* messages
Hello Thomas,
On Sat, 31 Aug 2002 at 15:48:22 [GMT +0700], you wrote:
TF Security through obscurity? I don't know what an embedded message
TF is. I have never come across this term in the RFC's. I can only
TF assume that it means the same as above - a plaintext message is
TF not scanned. This
Hello ETM,
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, at 13:49:09 [GMT -0400] (which was 1:49:09
PM in NY, USA) ETM wrote:
Limitations
Plugin doesn't certify messages due to a nature of the
anti-virus plugin interface of The Bat!. The plugin is called
only on message attachments. Outgoing messages are scanned
Hello James
On Saturday, August 31, 2002, you wrote
As Leif mentions, these are nested messages. And I believe
nested messages are actually scanned (after all they are
attachments themselves). But what do not get scanned are the
the attachments of those nested messages. So, better stated
Hello ETM,
On Sat, 31 Aug 2002, at 17:17:31 [GMT -0400] (which was 5:17:31
PM in NY, USA) ETM wrote:
My current AV is notifying me when it receives Klez, etc., usually
cleaning and restoring mail. Do I understand correctly that AVG
does not have that capability?
It will catch them. It's
Hello ETM,
On Saturday, 31. August 2002 at 17:17:31 [GMT -0400] you wrote:
My current AV is notifying me when it receives Klez, etc., usually
cleaning and restoring mail. Do I understand correctly that AVG
does not have that capability? I am not quick to open unknown
items but I also
I am considering changing my AV program. I noticed these
limitations on the AVG website. Can someone expand on the
ramifications of these statements? Many thanks in advance.
Elaine
Limitations
Plugin doesn't certify messages due to a nature of the anti-virus plugin interface of
The Bat!.
Sh'mae The,
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, at 13:49:09 [GMT -0400] (or 18:49 in Wales)
regarding 'AVG/TB limitations and issues' you wrote:
E I am considering changing my AV program. I noticed these
E limitations on the AVG website. Can someone expand on the
E ramifications of these statements? Many
Hi Elaine,
on Fri, 30 Aug 2002 13:49:09 -0400GMT (30.08.02, 19:49 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
E Embedded messages are not currently scanned. According to producers of
E The Bat!, this problem should be fixed in the version 1.62 of The Bat!
I'm sorry
On Friday, August 30, 2002, you wrote
As long as you're using 1.61 then not a problem.
E Embedded messages are not currently scanned. According to producers of The
E Bat!, this problem should be fixed in the version 1.62 of The Bat!
Only for mime digests etc, or groups of messages in
On Friday, August 30, 2002, you wrote
I'm sorry not to be able to answer your actual question, but how about
updating The Bat!? Your X-mailer header states yours is 1.60c. ;-)
As I just mentioned to Adam, my TB is working so well, I haven't
been inclined to fix it when it wasn't broke. Are
Hi ETM,
on Fri, 30 Aug 2002 14:33:01 -0400GMT (30.08.02, 20:33 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
E As I just mentioned to Adam, my TB is working so well, I haven't been
E inclined to fix it when it wasn't broke. Are there exceptional
E reasons for
Sh'mae The,
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, at 14:31:28 [GMT -0400] (or 19:31 in Wales)
regarding 'AVG/TB limitations and issues' you wrote:
E Thanks, Adam. I am not interested in the
E advertisement-certification feature grin so that was not a
E problem. I am using 1.60c -- that does concern me
13 matches
Mail list logo
