Hi Jim,
Friday, November 16, 2007, 5:15:58 PM, you wrote:
> It lists the contents of the selected TBK file, but that's apparently all
> that it does. I don't see any way for it to extract anything from a
> backup...
Unfortunately when I ran it the program took a long time to produce any results
On Friday, November 16, 2007, at 5:22:45 AM, Paul Meathrel wrote:
> Does anyone have any experience with this program?
It lists the contents of the selected TBK file, but that's apparently all
that it does. I don't see any way for it to extract anything from a
backup...
--
Jim Kyle
Using The B
Hi,
Friday, November 16, 2007, 11:12:56 AM, you wrote:
> Is there perhaps some chance that missing attachments could be recovered from
> backups?
It appears from looking on the TB forum that a tool called TBKDigger could be
used for restoring individual files
(http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forum/r
Hi Thomas,
Wednesday, November 14, 2007, 2:04:53 PM, you wrote:
> I tend to agree with you.
I am at a bit of a loss to know what to do about this situation. Clearly the
missing attachments don't exist in the email despite the attachment 'headers'
being there. Therefore the hope of recovering th
Hello Paul,
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 13:20:03 + GMT (13/11/2007, 20:20 +0700 GMT),
Paul Meathrel wrote:
>> Is there some gibberish under this line? There should be the whole
>> Word file, base64 encoded.
PM> No, the email is exactly as pasted with the exception of a few
PM> changes to the headers
Hello Maurice,
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 10:45:06 +0100 GMT (13/11/2007, 16:45 +0700 GMT),
Maurice McAdam wrote:
MM>>> --B_3257177834_183071
MM>>> Content-type: application/octet-stream; name="Mc Adam n° 1271.pdf"
MM>>> Content-disposition: attachment;
MM>>> filename*=ISO-8859-1''Mc%20Adam%20n%
Hi Thomas,
Tuesday, November 13, 2007, 2:01:46 AM, you wrote:
> Is there some gibberish under this line? There should be the whole
> Word file, base64 encoded.
No, the email is exactly as pasted with the exception of a few changes to the
headers. I've never altered any options regarding attachme
Hello Thomas,
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 09:04:44 +0700 GMT
(13.11.2007, 03:04 +0200 GMT, where I live),
you wrote:
MM>> --B_3257177834_183071
MM>> Content-type: application/octet-stream; name="Mc Adam n° 1271.pdf"
MM>> Content-disposition: attachment;
MM>> filename*=ISO-8859-1''Mc%20Adam%20n%B0
Hello Maurice,
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:44:19 +0100 GMT (13/11/2007, 02:44 +0700 GMT),
Maurice McAdam wrote:
TF>> Why don't you c&p the headers of a mail with "lost" attachments here?
TF>> You can neutralise the emails addresses and file names by replacing
TF>> them with [EMAIL PROTECTED] and whate
Hello Paul,
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 16:54:05 + GMT (12/11/2007, 23:54 +0700 GMT),
Paul Meathrel wrote:
>> Why don't you c&p the headers of a mail with "lost" attachments here?
PM> Here is an example of an email which is missing attachments from mine
[...]
PM> 5BB31A9214BAE96
PM>
Hello Thomas,
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:05:02 +0700 GMT
(12.11.2007, 14:05 +0200 GMT, where I live),
you wrote:
TF> Why don't you c&p the headers of a mail with "lost" attachments here?
TF> You can neutralise the emails addresses and file names by replacing
TF> them with [EMAIL PROTECTED] and whatev
Hi Thomas,
Monday, November 12, 2007, 1:05:02 PM, you wrote:
> Why don't you c&p the headers of a mail with "lost" attachments here?
Here is an example of an email which is missing attachments from mine
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:22:24 +
From: Paul Meathrel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: T
Hello Maurice,
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 20:20:58 +0100 GMT (12/11/2007, 02:20 +0700 GMT),
Maurice McAdam wrote:
MM> Perhaps the X-header tells TB! where the file is, but for me it is all
MM> gibberish.
Why don't you c&p the headers of a mail with "lost" attachments here?
You can neutralise the emails
Hello Thomas,
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 21:44:44 +0700 GMT
(11.11.2007, 15:44 +0200 GMT, where I live),
you wrote:
PM>>> I've come across an issue with my message base in TB. It appears
PM>>> that some attachments are no longer accessible from the original
PM>>> message. When I open such a message the
Hello Maurice,
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 10:08:22 +0100 GMT (11/11/2007, 16:08 +0700 GMT),
Maurice McAdam wrote:
MM> Hello Paul,
MM> On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 16:40:48 + GMT
MM> (09.11.2007, 17:40 +0200 GMT, where I live),
MM> you wrote:
PM>> I've come across an issue with my message base in TB. It appe
Hello Paul,
On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 16:40:48 + GMT
(09.11.2007, 17:40 +0200 GMT, where I live),
you wrote:
PM> I've come across an issue with my message base in TB. It appears
PM> that some attachments are no longer accessible from the original
PM> message. When I open such a message the attachmen
Hi Tom,
Saturday, November 10, 2007, 12:02:04 AM, you wrote:
> how are you normally treating your attachments? I recently changed
> some of my accounts from "keeping in message bodies" to "in separate
> directories". If I move the attachment later or delete as supposedly
> no longer needed in the
Saturday, November 10, 2007, 3:40:48 AM, you wrote:
> Hi all,
> I've come across an issue with my message base in TB. It appears
> that some attachments are no longer accessible from the original
> message. When I open such a message the attachment and its name is
> visible as normal, however on
Hi all,
I've come across an issue with my message base in TB. It appears that some
attachments are no longer accessible from the original message. When I open
such a message the attachment and its name is visible as normal, however on
attempting to open the file I get an message:
Contents of t
19 matches
Mail list logo
