Hello Nick,
It was foretold that on Sunday, December 30, 2001 at 9:45 PM, Nick
Andriash [NA] would type:
NA In my estimation, we could resolve a lot of this simply by providing
NA User definable Toolbars,
I know it would be nice, but could you imagine the support horror if
that were
Hi Januk,
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001 01:06:49 -0800GMT (31/12/01, 17:06 +0800GMT),
Januk Aggarwal wrote:
NA In my estimation, we could resolve a lot of this simply by providing
NA User definable Toolbars,
JA I know it would be nice, but could you imagine the support horror if
JA that were
Hello Thomas,
Historians believe that Monday, December 31, 2001 at 17:17 GMT +0800
was when, Thomas F [TF] typed the following:
TF Hmmm. It seems you are not using any software with configurable
TF toolbars. There exist a lot.
Not quite. I just don't change too much in software that is
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001 11:51:35 +0800, Thomas F [TF] graced us with these
comments:
...
TF IMHO this is quite a reasonable suggestion. However, I wouldn't
TF change the whole interface to hide advances functions, but rather
TF move advanced funtions under an Advanced... menu item in each
TF menu.
Hello Januk Aggarwal,
On Monday, December 31 2001 at 01:06 AM PDT, you wrote:
I know it would be nice, but could you imagine the support horror if
that were implemented? Every person could have different menus, so
there would be no way of telling them how to find the feature they
Hello Allie,
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001 06:53:05 -0500 GMT (31/12/2001, 19:53 +0800 GMT),
Allie C Martin wrote:
TF move advanced funtions under an Advanced... menu item in each
TF menu.
ACM This sounds nice to me. Although come to think of it, flow of the
ACM menus depend on the options being
Hi Don,
On Sat, 29 Dec 2001 11:47:37 -0800GMT (30/12/2001, 03:47 +0800GMT),
Don Taylor wrote:
DT I've never used an e-mail client that comes anywhere close to TB! in
DT terms of power and flexibility -- especially in the area of multiple
DT e-mail accounts. I recommend it heartily to anyone who
Hello Thomas F,
On Sunday, December 30 2001 at 07:51 PM PDT, you wrote:
IMHO this is quite a reasonable suggestion. However, I wouldn't change
the whole interface to hide advances functions, but rather move
advanced funtions under an Advanced... menu item in each menu.
In my estimation, we
Hi Bat-fellows,
need to brag about something: back in July I ventured to write a few
succinct lines of appreciation of The Bat! at CNET's www.download.com.
Tonight while casually browsing that server, I've noticed that the
review has been picked by CNET as representative for introducing The
On 29 December 2001 at 6:02 pm Avenarius wrote:
Hi Bat-fellows,
need to brag about something: back in July I ventured to write a few
succinct lines of appreciation of The Bat! at CNET's www.download.com.
Tonight while casually browsing that server, I've noticed that the
review has been
I see we're in the midst of a topic shift here (Bat review -
Wishlist), but I'm going to jump in, anyway :)
I've never used an e-mail client that comes anywhere close to TB! in
terms of power and flexibility -- especially in the area of multiple
e-mail accounts. I recommend it heartily to anyone
A Bat-fellow, Alastair Scott,
wrote on 29 December 2001 at 19:07:09 GMT,
which was 20:07 in Bratislava --
AS Further down the thread there's a few interesting comments [...]:
The editor for composing messages is SO bad, that it ruins an
otherwise very nice program.
AS [...] because of the
On 29 Dec 2001, 1:48:52 PM, Avenarius wrote:
Is it then true that TB!'s editor is primarily suited for the needs
of power users rather than ordinary users? Perhaps it only comes
across as such to the first-time user, which wouldn't then be a
fault in the editor but in its presentation as
On 12/29/2001, Avenarius wrote:
s it then true that TB!'s editor is primarily suited for the needs of
power users rather than ordinary users? Perhaps it only comes across
as such to the first-time user, which wouldn't then be a fault in the
editor but in its presentation as Alastair says.
14 matches
Mail list logo
