On Mon, 31 Dec 2001 11:51:35 +0800, Thomas F [TF] graced us with these
comments:
...
TF> IMHO this is quite a reasonable suggestion. However, I wouldn't
TF> change the whole interface to hide advances functions, but rather
TF> move advanced funtions under an Advanced... menu item in each
TF> menu.
TF> Many programs have an "Advanced" tab for the more complex
TF> features, so this should not be too far-fetched.
This sounds nice to me. Although come to think of it, flow of the
menus depend on the options being sensibly categorised and listed in a
prioritized fashion in that the more frequently used options are
listed first for each category. Using your system, we may very well
end up separating two related functions.
Case in point:
Shouldn't the 'alternate forward' option be placed under the 'forward'
option. Users will more readily know that this useful function exists.
In fact, those other three reply options that are with 'alternate
forward' really shouldn't be there, IMHO. It only makes the options
harder to get at and hidden from the user.
--
____________________________________
�Allie C Martin (_ List Moderator and fellow end user
______________________) TB! v1.54 Beta/20 & WinXP Home Ed.
PGPKey: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=PGPPubKey1
��
--
________________________________________________________
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
