Re: Clocks, oh look at those clocks (was: Re: Replies arrive before originals)

Hello Januk, Sunday, August 13, 2000, 8:57:00 pm, you wrote: JA> I don't know exactly how my PC clock works, but mine stinks. It adds JA> and subtracts hours at a time. There doesn't seem to be a pattern. JA> I think some of the time issues are OS and running apps related. JA> This is surp

Re: Clocks, oh look at those clocks (was: Re: Replies arrive before originals)

Hello Marc, On Tue, 15 Aug 2000 11:29:34 -0400 GMT your local time, which was Tuesday, August 15, 2000, 10:29:34 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Marc wrote: > Hello Januk, > Tuesday, August 15, 2000, 1:38:31 am, you wrote: >>> It might just be that he needs a new battery. JA>> If it were that

Re[2]: Clocks, oh look at those clocks (was: Re: Replies arrive before originals)

Hello Januk, Tuesday, August 15, 2000, 1:38:31 am, you wrote: >> It might just be that he needs a new battery. JA> If it were that, wouldn't shutting off my computer reset the clock JA> every time? (This doesn't happen.) I don't see any pattern, so I JA> think it might be some obscure ap

Re: Tardis is A-OK(was(Re: Re: Clocks, oh look at those clocks (was: Re: Replies arrive before originals))

Hi Patrick, Monday, August 14, 2000, 11:50:35 PM, you wrote: >> With this discusson about time keeping I use Tardis >> to keep my clocks up to date. >> Patrick> Truly a useful application. Have been using various versions for several years. I will give it a try

Re: Clocks, oh look at those clocks (was: Re: Replies arrive before originals)

Hello Tony, On Monday, August 14, 2000 at 12:01:31 GMT +0100 (which was 4:01 AM where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: > It might just be that he needs a new battery. If it were that, wouldn't shutting off my computer reset the clock every time? (This doesn't happen.) I don't see any

Re: Tardis is A-OK(was(Re: Re: Clocks, oh look at those clocks (was: Re: Replies arrive before originals))

Hi Patrick, On Monday 14/08/2000 at 22:50, you wrote: >> With this discusson about time keeping I use Tardis >> to keep my clocks up to date. >> > Truly a useful application. Have been using various versions for several years. =) Similarly, I have a good program

Tardis is A-OK(was(Re: Re: Clocks, oh look at those clocks (was: Re: Replies arrive before originals))

Hi, Cricket, At 08/13/2000 21:28:00 you wrote: > > With this discusson about time keeping I use Tardis > to keep my clocks up to date. > Truly a useful application. Have been using various versions for several years. Regards, Patrick L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ---

Re: Clocks, oh look at those clocks (was: Re: Replies arrive before originals)

This message: 14/08/2000 12:00 GMT. Hello Thomas, On 14 August 2000 at 12:02:22 GMT +0800 (which was 05:02 where I live) Thomas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed: TF> I would think there is either something wrong with your oscillator TF> (built on a Monday?), or with the software that translates the inf

Re: Clocks, oh look at those clocks (was: Re: Replies arrive before originals)

Hi Januk, On Sun, 13 Aug 2000 17:57:00 -0700GMT (14/08/2000, 08:57 +0800GMT), Januk Aggarwal wrote: >> Geez, if a PC clock is so far off real time, I think someone needs to >> invent a new oszillator! ;-) JA> I don't know exactly how my PC clock works, but mine stinks. It adds JA> and subtra

Re: Clocks, oh look at those clocks (was: Re: Replies arrive before originals)

Howdy folks: With this discusson about time keeping I use Tardis to keep my clocks up to date. -- Cheers, Cricketmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] They laugh that win. -- -- Vie

Clocks, oh look at those clocks (was: Re: Replies arrive before originals)

Hello Thomas, On Sunday, August 13, 2000 at 20:24:27 GMT +0800 (which was 5:24 AM where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: > Geez, if a PC clock is so far off real time, I think someone needs to > invent a new oszillator! ;-) I don't know exactly how my PC clock works, but mine stinks. It a