Hi there Mr. Fox,
Going back 06:20 31.01.2001. when you uttered the following thoughts:
Probably allow POP3 on an internal LAN, but don't want people checking
personal mail at work, or bringing in viruses/worms in school or
something like that. The firewall admin probably forgot to block
Hi there Marck,
Going back 23:44 30.01.2001. when you uttered the following thoughts:
... and MD5 CRAM. Both of these encoded login methods are supported. I
use MD5-APOP myself.
I know that POP3 can be made secure. I personally really enjoy using
it over an SSH tunnel or secured via SSL.
Hi there Marck,
Going back 02:32 30.01.2001. when you uttered the following thoughts:
Personally, I have no need for IMAP. If you have real and complex IMAP
needs, i.e. as more than a glorified POP protocol, then TB v1 is not
going to suit you.
I would love to hear from someone
On 29 Jan 2001, at 20:35, Brian Clark wrote:
Hello Andrew,
(AH == "Andrew Hodgson") [EMAIL PROTECTED] conveyed:
AH Other than the bats other rfc deficiencies, can we confirm/deny
that AH tb supports imap in the following way:
I don't use IMAP, but AFAIK TB! supports it (to what
On 30 Jan 2001, at 18:05, Johannes Posel wrote:
Hi there Marck,
Going back 02:32 30.01.2001. when you uttered the following thoughts:
Personally, I have no need for IMAP. If you have real and complex
IMAP needs, i.e. as more than a glorified POP protocol, then TB v1
is not going to
Dear Andrew,
Going back 18:29 30.01.2001. when you uttered the following thoughts:
This wasn't the design of imap, however, and so it didn't forfil my
requirements.
So basically TB uses it just like POP3. Well, to be honest, for me
this is great, because this way I can circumvent the
On 30 Jan 2001, at 17:33, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Andrew,
On 30 January 2001 at 11:34:44 - (which was 11:34 where I live)
Andrew Hodgson wrote and made these points:
AH Mulberry is the comparison :-)
AH I hate the ui,
Hello Marck,
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, at 17:33:20 (your local time), you wrote:
MDP I all fairness, the very ethos of full IMAP, with on-line folder
MDP structures, goes against the TB strengths in local mail-base. I can't
MDP see how TB can offer full IMAP support and still be the TB
Hello Johannes,
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, at 19:46:59 (your local time), you wrote:
JP So basically TB uses it just like POP3. Well, to be honest, for me
JP this is great, because this way I can circumvent the postmasters
JP stupid idea of banning POP3 and enforcing IMAP. He gives no mbox max
This
Hi there Lija,
Going back 20:35 30.01.2001. when you uttered the following thoughts:
This is very off-topic now, but I'm curios: Why should someone enforce users to
use IMAP and ban POP3?
POP3 logins are transmitted clear text, while IMAP are somewhat
secured. Personally I prefer POP3-SSL or
Hello Andrew,
AH On 30 Jan 2001, at 18:05, Johannes Posel wrote:
skip
Personally, I have no need for IMAP. If you have real and
complex IMAP needs, i.e. as more than a glorified POP
protocol, then TB v1 is not going to suit you.
I would love to hear from someone knowledgeable what TB
On 30 Jan 2001, at 21:02, Johannes Posel wrote:
Hi there Lija,
Going back 20:35 30.01.2001. when you uttered the following thoughts:
This is very off-topic now, but I'm curios: Why should someone
enforce users to use IMAP and ban POP3?
POP3 logins are transmitted clear text, while
Hello Johannes,
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, at 21:02:20 (your local time), you wrote:
JP POP3 logins are transmitted clear text, while IMAP are somewhat
JP secured. Personally I prefer POP3-SSL or POP3 over SSH...
You have also APOP in TB... it's up to your ISP if supports it...
--
Best Regards,
Hello Lija,
Tuesday, January 30, 2001, 11:35:57 AM, you wrote:
L Hello Johannes,
L On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, at 19:46:59 (your local time), you wrote:
JP So basically TB uses it just like POP3. Well, to be honest, for me
JP this is great, because this way I can circumvent the postmasters
JP stupid
Hi all.
Other than the bats other rfc deficiencies, can we confirm/deny that
tb supports imap in the following way:
1. Allow the viewing of read/unread messages?
2. Lookup other folders other than inbox?
3. Manipulation?
I would love to know.
P.S. For a real imap client, try Mulberry,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Andrew,
On 29 January 2001 at 23:43:32 - (which was 23:43 where I live)
Andrew Hodgson wrote and made these points:
AH Other than the bats other rfc deficiencies,
What RFC deficiencies are you alleging? None have been reported for a
Hello Andrew,
(AH == "Andrew Hodgson") [EMAIL PROTECTED] conveyed:
AH Other than the bats other rfc deficiencies, can we confirm/deny that
AH tb supports imap in the following way:
I don't use IMAP, but AFAIK TB! supports it (to what degree, I don't
know). In account properties, one of the
17 matches
Mail list logo
