Re[2]: Filters for Spam

2003-02-21 Thread Spike
Hello Paul Smithson, On or about Friday, February 21, 2003 at 18:00:16GMT + (which was 1:00 PM in the tropics where I live) Paul Smithson postulated, ruminated and made these points on the subject of Filters for Spam: PS Hello John, PS Friday, February 21, 2003, 5:23:51 PM, you wrote

Re: Filters for Spam

2003-02-21 Thread Robert C Wittig
Hello Paul, Friday, February 21, 2003, 12:00:16 PM, you wrote: PS As a Brit I feel pretty insulted that my genuine PS e-mails could be filtered out as spam just because I PS used the symbol of my countries currency (one of the PS World's major currencies). If you are going to go

Re: Filters for Spam

2003-02-21 Thread ~John
Paul Smithson wrote: P Why you would include a £ symbol Why would you use that symbol in a subject line ? -- Regards, ~John Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Filters for Spam

2003-02-21 Thread ~John
something. Also you don't have to worry about your email being filtered, because all mail to this list goes to my theBat folder. I sort mail to all folders and then I have the known filter after these and then my spam filters. -- Regards, ~John Current

Re: Filters for Spam

2003-02-21 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Spike, on Fri, 21 Feb 2003 13:21:46 -0500GMT (21.02.03, 19:21 +0100GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : S Example from a recent Asian spam: S Subject: ¡m¤@­Ó§Y£±N¾î±½½u¤W¹£CÀ¸ªº¤j«¬¹qª±½Ï¥Í¡A¡i¨M¾Ô¡j¹CÀ¸±N©ó12¤ë S

Re: Filters for Spam

2003-02-21 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Robert, on Fri, 21 Feb 2003 12:25:52 -0600GMT (21.02.03, 19:25 +0100GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : RCW Roughly 1/3 of the spam I see looks like this: RCW ¼ö½Å°ÅºÎÇÒ ¸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò¸¦ , with no standard ASCII chars anywhere south of RCW the header. It only means

Re: Filters for Spam

2003-02-21 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello ~John, Here is a filter that gets rid of alot of spam for me: [strings] £ You would drop many messages from me if you and I exchanged business e-mail :) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.61

Re: Filters for Spam

2003-02-21 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Friday, February 21, 2003, 1:21 PM, you wrote: S I wish there was an easy way to copy filters between accounts or make a master S set of filters that work on all accounts... I get the same spam coming to S multiple email address and have to delete them over and over in 1 session... right

Re[2]: Filters for Spam

2003-02-21 Thread Spike
Hello Miguel A. Urech, On or about Friday, February 21, 2003 at 19:45:04GMT +0100 (which was 1:45 PM in the tropics where I live) Miguel A. Urech posted: [strings] £ MAU You would drop many messages from me if you and I exchanged business MAU e-mail :) If you send me mail with $, £ or any

Re: Filters for Spam

2003-02-21 Thread ~John
Miguel A. Urech wrote: M You would drop many messages from me if you and I exchanged business M e-mail :) No, I would not. If I was going to do business with you, I would add you to my address book, then my Known filter would catch your E-Mail before my Spam filters would. -- Regards, ~John

Re: Filters for Spam

2003-02-21 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello ~John, No, I would not. If I was going to do business with you, I would add you to my address book, then my Known filter would catch your E-Mail before my Spam filters would. You are right. Anyway, I would never do business with someone whose name I can't pronounce. How the h*** you

Re: Filters for Spam

2003-02-21 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello Spike, If you send me mail with $, £ or any other currency symbol in the Subject line, you would certainly be sent to my TRASH folder, as you are trying to sell me something I did not request. I said: If we were doing business... :) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial -

Not 20 , not 20 but 20 (was: filters for Spam)

2003-02-21 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Bats, Now John did not see I was planning to donate him 20 ¤! :-)) alas, now it is too late... -- Best Whishes, Mark using The Bat! 1.63 Beta/7 Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:

Re: Not 20 , not 20 but 20 (was: filters for Spam)

2003-02-21 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Mark, Friday, February 21, 2003, 8:23:03 PM, you wrote: MP Hello Bats, MP Now John did not see I was planning to donate him 20 ¤! :-)) MP alas, now it is too late... Strange, in the original message, the subject was: Not 20 ¥, not 20 £ but 20 ¤ Anyone any idea why this was changed,

Re: Filters for Spam

2003-02-21 Thread ~John
Miguel A. Urech wrote: M You are right. Anyway, I would never do business with someone whose M name I can't pronounce. How the h*** you pronounce ~John starting with M the ~? ;-) Very carefully! LOL -- Regards, ~John Current version is 1.62 |

Re: Not 20 , not 20 but 20 (was: filters for Spam)

2003-02-21 Thread ~John
Mark Partous wrote: M Now John did not see I was planning to donate him 20 ¤! :-)) M alas, now it is too late... As Homer Simpson would say, DOH !!! -- Regards, ~John Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:

Re[2]: Filters for Spam

2003-02-21 Thread Mike Alexander
Hi Paul, Friday, February 21, 2003, 6:00:16 PM, you wrote: PS Hello John, PS Friday, February 21, 2003, 5:23:51 PM, you wrote: ~ Here is a filter that gets rid of alot of spam for me: ~ [strings] ~ £|¥|¤|§|«|»|À|Á|Å|µ|¿ PS Why you would include a £ symbol. PS As a Brit I feel pretty

Re[2]: Filters for Spam

2003-02-21 Thread Mike Alexander
from people you're happy to have mail from be filtered at the top of your filter list, with the spam filters following underneath. ;-) -- Best regards, Mike Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http

Re: Filters for Spam

2003-02-21 Thread St - Musaic.Net
You would drop many messages from me if you and I exchanged business e-mail :) Can't see why since this is what a whitelist would and should fix. / St Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:

Re[2]: Filters for Spam

2003-02-21 Thread Mike Alexander
Hi St, Saturday, February 22, 2003, 1:59:18 AM, you wrote: You would drop many messages from me if you and I exchanged business e-mail :) SMN Can't see why since this is what a whitelist would and should fix. Try replying to the right person. You just piggybacked my reply ;-) -- Best

Re: Filters for Spam

2003-02-21 Thread St - Musaic.Net
Try replying to the right person. You just piggybacked my reply ;-) I see that now...just forget I replied, people...and once again I did not add anything clever to the discussion... / St Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-10 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Thomas, @10-Feb-2003, 14:50 +0700 (07:50 UK time) Thomas Fernandez [TF] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: TF Usually escaping it with another % works. So if you need %40, TF you type %%40. (I didn't try it.) Precisely - this will

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-10 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Thomas, on Mon, 10 Feb 2003 14:50:24 +0700GMT (10.02.03, 08:50 +0100GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : TF Usually escaping it with another % works. So if you need %40, you type TF %%40. (I didn't try it.) Thanks, but it doesn't work here. Another % leads to

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-10 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Peter, @10-Feb-2003, 14:37 +0100 (13:37 UK time) Peter Meyns [PM] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: TF Usually escaping it with another % works. So if you need %40, TF you type %%40. (I didn't try it.) PM Thanks, but it doesn't

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-10 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello ~John, And the person mentioned that he had tried SpamPal, SpamCop, etc.. etc.. and come to realize taht theBats filters was just as efficient. That is for a different story. They were talking about _detecting_ spam while Marck's filters the thread is about is for _reporting_ spam

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-10 Thread ~John
- - - Miguel A. Urech wrote - - - M That is for a different story. They were talking about _detecting_ M spam while Marck's filters the thread is about is for _reporting_ spam M to Spamcop. - - - End of Miguel A. Urech's message - - - Miguel, I still don't see where SpamCop has done anything

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-10 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello ~John, I still don't see where SpamCop has done anything to stop Spam. With all affection and respect to you: There is no one blinder than that who doesn't want to see :) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.61

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-10 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Miguel, @10-Feb-2003, 17:33 +0100 (16:33 UK time) Miguel A. Urech [MAU] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I still don't see where SpamCop has done anything to stop Spam. MAU With all affection and respect to you: There is no

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-10 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Marck, on Mon, 10 Feb 2003 14:39:42 +GMT (10.02.03, 15:39 +0100GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : PM ...name%%40domain.com... turns to name0domain.com... PM Strange... MDP Not necessarily. Could this be to do with batch files? %4 is the MDP fourth

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-10 Thread ~John
- - - Peter Meyns wrote - - - P on Mon, 10 Feb 2003 14:39:42 +GMT (10.02.03, 15:39 +0100GMT here), P you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : PM ...name%%40domain.com... turns to name0domain.com... Could someone give me some good instructions on how to setup the SpamCop

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-10 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello Marck, ... or to put it another way, the work SpamCop does... snipped quite a bit Thanks Marck, I couldn't have explained it better :-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.61 Current version is 1.62

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-10 Thread Peter Meyns
ge. As for your question about the SpamCop filters, it's not difficult. Once you have set up your account with www.spamcop.net you can use the service easily with the filters from the FAQ. :-) (The automatic log-in was a bit tricky, but we got it! :)) ) -- Cheers Peter abbr. is the abbr. f

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-10 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Sunday, February 9, 2003, 3:49 PM, you wrote: PM ...I'd like to submit my login name and password automatically PM along with the URL. Any ideas if/how I could do that? MDP Yes - I just got this working: MDP

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-10 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Paul, On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 14:42:28 -0500 GMT (11/02/03, 02:42 +0700 GMT), Paul Cartwright wrote: MDP \22c:\5CProgram\20Files\5CInternet\20Explorer\5CIEXPLORE.EXE\22\20%-\0D\0Ahttp://[...] [...] You may need to change the launcher (which refers to IE) if IE is not your default browser.

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-10 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Monday, February 10, 2003, 5:28 PM, you wrote: MDP \22c:\5CProgram\20Files\5CInternet\20Explorer\5CIEXPLORE.EXE\22\20%-\0D\0Ahttp://[...] [...] You may need to change the launcher (which refers to IE) if IE is not your default browser. my default browser is now Mozilla... it saysyou MAY

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-10 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Paul, On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 17:45:41 -0500 GMT (11/02/03, 05:45 +0700 GMT), Paul Cartwright wrote: TF Yes it would. What he meant is You may want to change the launcher, TF depending on your preferences. Assuming that the default browser is TF your preferred browser. ;-) my default browser

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-10 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello ~John, I still don't see where SpamCop has done anything to stop Spam. This is part of the full report I got for one of the last spam I submitted to Spamcop: ,- [ ] | ISP has already cancelled the account used to send this spam. ISP | resolved this issue sometime after martes, 11

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-10 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Monday, February 10, 2003, 5:54 PM, you wrote: my default browser is Mozilla, but I have IE and opera installed. Opera is fastest, but flakiest. I'd rather use Mozilla than IE, but I think you need to have IE installed to do the wonderful windows updates. I seem to recall it wouldn't work

SpamCop filters

2003-02-09 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi all, on Sun, 9 Feb 2003 10:19:58 +GMT (09.02.03, 11:19 +0100GMT here), Marck wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] about the two filters to automatize the SpamCop report. MDP They have two different purposes and are for the two stages of MDP SpamCop submission. T

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-09 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Meyns [PM] wrote:' PM The first one works fine here, manually and automatically. The PM second one takes me to the SpamCop log in dialog. Albeit not too PM much of an effort to do it manually - I

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-09 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Allie, on Sun, 9 Feb 2003 08:39:09 -0500GMT (09.02.03, 14:39 +0100GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : PM I'd like to submit my login name and password automatically along PM with the URL. Any ideas if/how I could do that? AM No facility there on the web

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-09 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Peter, on Sun, 9 Feb 2003 15:14:26 +0100GMT (09.02.03, 15:14 +0100GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : PM I'd like to submit my login name and password automatically along PM with the URL. Any ideas if/how I could do that? AM No facility there on the web

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-09 Thread ~John
I hit the keyboard shortcuts Ctrl+Alt+S and it put the message in the outbox, then I sent them, however I got this error message back from Spamcop: SpamCop encountered errors while saving spam for processing: SpamCop could not find your spam message in this email: -- Best Regards, ~John - - -

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-09 Thread ~John
Is this how the reply template supposed to be setup? =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= From:%OFromName %OFromAddr To: %OToName %OToAddr Date:%ODateEn, %OTimeLongEn Subject: %OSubj Files: %Attachments

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-09 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi ~John, @9-Feb-2003, 14:17 -0600 (20:17 UK time) ~John [j] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I have reformatted this message without the top posting because it is harder to work out what's going on in a vacuum. Please see below for

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-09 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Peter, @9-Feb-2003, 14:24 +0100 (13:24 UK time) Peter Meyns [PM] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: PM ...I'd like to submit my login name and password automatically PM along with the URL. Any ideas if/how I could do that? Yes - I

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-09 Thread ~John
I don't know what in the world your talking about, type a little more down-to-earth for me, just tell me do this or don't do this As for the SpamCop filter forget it, I was looking back through some past email's and agree with the argument that I would just be wasting my time reporting spam to

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-09 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Sunday, February 9, 2003, 3:49 PM, you wrote: PM ...I'd like to submit my login name and password automatically PM along with the URL. Any ideas if/how I could do that? MDP Yes - I just got this working: MDP BeginFilter MDP Name: SpamCop AutoResponder MDP Active: 1 MDP Source: \\Marck\Inbox

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-09 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi ~John, @9-Feb-2003, 14:51 -0600 (20:51 UK time) ~John [j] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: j I don't know what in the world your talking about, type a little j more down-to-earth for me, Okay. Sorry if it wasn't clear enough for

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-09 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Paul, @9-Feb-2003, 17:18 -0500 (22:18 UK time) Paul Cartwright said: how does this get my password?? You have to edit *your* login and password in place of mine where it says marck:password (of course password is not my real password g). - --

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-09 Thread ~John
are.) And the person mentioned that he had tried SpamPal, SpamCop, etc.. etc.. and come to realize taht theBats filters was just as efficient. - - - End of Marck D Pearlstone's message, and ~John's Reply - - - Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-09 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Sunday, February 9, 2003, 7:08 PM, you wrote: how does this get my password?? MDP You have to edit *your* login and password in place of mine where it MDP says marck:password (of course password is not my real password MDP g). DUH ! -- Paul Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/5 on Windows XP

Re[2]: SpamCop filters

2003-02-09 Thread Mike Alexander
Hi Marck, Monday, February 10, 2003, 12:08:44 AM, you wrote: MDP You have to edit *your* login and password in place of mine where it MDP says marck:password (of course password is not my real password MDP g). Oh wow, and there was I thinking I could crack your system ;-) -- Best

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-09 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Marck, on Sun, 9 Feb 2003 20:49:02 +GMT (09.02.03, 21:49 +0100GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MDP Hash: SHA1 MDP Hi Peter, MDP @9-Feb-2003, 14:24 +0100 (13:24 UK time) Peter Meyns [PM] in MDP [EMAIL

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-09 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Peter, On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 07:27:28 +0100 GMT (10/02/03, 13:27 +0700 GMT), Peter Meyns wrote: Thanks a lot Marck! I'm just afraid it won't work completely for me as my username is an e-mail address to be submitted with %40 instead of @ (myname%40domain.com:password). If I enter it like

Old newbie back, wondering about copying filters

2003-02-02 Thread Krister Ekstrom
Hi Bat! people, I've just changed email addresses and had to start a new account in TB. What i wonder now is, can i copy one or more filters from one account to another? How do you do so that it gets everything right? TIA -- -- /Krister mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This mail brought to you

Re: Old newbie back, wondering about copying filters

2003-02-02 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Krister, welcome back. On Sun, 2 Feb 2003 18:37:04 +0100 GMT (03/02/03, 00:37 +0700 GMT), Krister Ekstrom wrote: I've just changed email addresses and had to start a new account in TB. What i wonder now is, can i copy one or more filters from one account to another? Open the sorting

Re:Old newbie back, wondering about copying filters

2003-02-02 Thread Jurgen Haug
Hello Krister, Sunday, February 2, 2003, 6:37:04 PM, you wrote: Hi Bat! people, I've just changed email addresses and had to start a new account in TB. What i wonder now is, can i copy one or more filters from one account to another? How do you do so that it gets everything right? TIA

Re: Old newbie back, wondering about copying filters

2003-02-02 Thread Allie Martin
account into which you want to copy the TF filter. Open the sorting office, go to the first filter in the TF Incoming (or whatever) filter list, hit crtl-V. The filter is copied TF and appears as the last filter in the filter list. May I respectfully add that if you wish to copy multiple

Re: Old newbie back, wondering about copying filters

2003-02-02 Thread Deborah W
On Sunday, February 2, 2003, 5:37:04 PM, Krister Ekstrom wrote: KE I've just changed email addresses and had to start a new account in KE TB. What i wonder now is, can i copy one or more filters from one KE account to another? How do you do so that it gets everything right? Is it just

me and my filters again!

2003-01-29 Thread Jurgen Haug
Hello everyone, it's me again, sorry for bugging with my problems with the filters, but it just seems to not get into my head: why does this not work (without the quotes): unsubscribe\sfrom.*mailing\slist I have put that into the STRING field and it does not filter out an email that contains

Re: me and my filters again!

2003-01-29 Thread Gerd Ewald
Hello Jurgen Haug ! On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 13:42:04 +0100 GMT your local time, which was 29.01.2003, 13:42 (GMT+0100) where I live, you (Jurgen Haug) wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: I understand, that \s means looking for a white space, and I think .* means just any

Re: me and my filters again!

2003-01-29 Thread Jurgen Haug
Hello Gerd, Wednesday, January 29, 2003, 2:17:27 PM, you wrote: I understand, that \s means looking for a white space, and I think .* means just any characters between 'from' and 'mailing' (because I noticed that a lot use that phrase with little differentiations. You told your filter to

Re: me and my filters again!

2003-01-29 Thread Gerd Ewald
Hello Jurgen Haug ! On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 14:27:57 +0100 GMT your local time, which was 29.01.2003, 14:27 (GMT+0100) where I live, you (Jurgen Haug) wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: You told your filter to use regular expressions? In your filter, tab options let me

Re: me and my filters again!

2003-01-29 Thread Jurgen Haug
Hello Gerd, Wednesday, January 29, 2003, 2:55:40 PM, you wrote: *grmpfl* The regex matches your text, that is tested with the regex tester. And you have set the filter with the following conditions? StringsLocation Presence

Re: me and my filters again!

2003-01-29 Thread Gerd Ewald
Hello Jurgen Haug ! On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 15:14:23 +0100 GMT your local time, which was 29.01.2003, 15:14 (GMT+0100) where I live, you (Jurgen Haug) wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: well, here we go: BeginFilter [...] EndFilter Hmm, I will read this one later I

Re: me and my filters again!

2003-01-29 Thread Gerd Ewald
Hello Jurgen Haug ! On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 15:14:23 +0100 GMT your local time, which was 29.01.2003, 15:14 (GMT+0100) where I live, you (Jurgen Haug) wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: well, here we go: BeginFilter Ooops, there is not another filter that could match your

Re: me and my filters again!

2003-01-29 Thread Jurgen Haug
Hello Gerd, Wednesday, January 29, 2003, 3:31:50 PM, you wrote: I bet the error waves with both hands at you, but it doesn't at me O:-) btw how do I make the regex not mind about a new line break? (?s)apologies.*if\s+you\s+have\s+been\s+sent.*this\s+email\s+in\s+error.*removal.*request

Re: me and my filters again!

2003-01-29 Thread Jurgen Haug
re we go: BeginFilter Ooops, there is not another filter that could match your unsubscribe-mail before this spam filter gets it? To be honest, I can't see why your filter shouldn't work. I created a mail with the text you wrote and it was filtered as ecpected... well, I've got only filters t

Re: me and my filters again!

2003-01-29 Thread Gerd Ewald
Hello Jurgen Haug ! On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 15:43:04 +0100 GMT your local time, which was 29.01.2003, 15:43 (GMT+0100) where I live, you (Jurgen Haug) wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: For further explanation I would like to redirect you to: ,-- [

filters

2003-01-29 Thread greekdivers
Hello tbudl, Is there a way with a filter to check the message subject and if the subject meets the requirements (of the filter) then it will deleted from the server without first going into my inbox? -- Best regards, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Called a blind

Re: filters

2003-01-29 Thread Roelof Otten
into my inbox? Yes. Use the 'Selective download' filters and check your mail first with the mail dispatcher (Account - Dispatch mail on server). -- Groetjes, Roelof Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com

Re: filters

2003-01-29 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello greekdivers, Is there a way with a filter to check the message subject and if the subject meets the requirements (of the filter) then it will deleted from the server without first going into my inbox? Yes, try Selective Download filters. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El

Re[2]: filters

2003-01-29 Thread greekdivers
Hello Miguel, Wednesday, January 29, 2003, 11:08:36 PM, you wrote: MAU Yes, try Selective Download filters. It worked,thanks -- Best regards, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL

Re[2]: Multiple AB entries from filters

2003-01-21 Thread Daniel Hirning
In reply to Allie's message 'Multiple AB entries from filters' on Mon, 20 Jan 2003 06:42:14 -0500 from [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Allie, AM For your filter that you use to add the address, you can go to the AM advanced tab and select, address must not be in address book // AM Items - sender

Re: Multiple AB entries from filters

2003-01-21 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Daniel, On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 22:13:19 +1100GMT (21-1-03, 12:13 +0100GMT, where I live), you wrote: DH I have been putting off asking this on this list for ages DH because i thought it was a waste of time and space, I should DH have just asked in the beginning. In that case you're

Re: Multiple AB entries from filters

2003-01-20 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Allie, On Sun, 19 Jan 2003 11:28:20 -0500GMT (19-1-03, 17:28 +0100GMT, where I live), you wrote: AM Perhaps something should be done about the filtering to address AM this issue (a switch to not add addresses when entries already AM contain the address to be added). This can be done. Set

Re: Multiple AB entries from filters

2003-01-20 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Roelof, On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 11:50:21 +0100GMT (20-1-03, 11:50 +0100GMT, where I live), you wrote: RO Set in your filter 'Addresses must not be listed in Address Book' RO (located on the options tab) That would be the 'advanced' tab and not options, of course. ;-0 -- Groetjes, Roelof

Re: Multiple AB entries from filters

2003-01-20 Thread Allie Martin
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Roelof Otten [RO] wrote:' RO This can be done. Set in your filter 'Addresses must not be listed RO in Address Book' (located on the options tab). That option checks RO whether the address is listed, it doesn't compare the names or RO whatever, only the

Transferring filters

2003-01-19 Thread John Phillips
Hi Bat! Fans, I am in the process of setting up a third isp (actually Hamster). Is there any way of simply transferring all my existing filters to this third isp from my other two accounts? Thanks! -- John Phillips, Sydney, Australia Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5.1

Re: Transferring filters

2003-01-19 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo John, On Sun, 19 Jan 2003 20:45:25 +1100GMT (19-1-03, 10:45 +0100GMT, where I live), you wrote: JP Is there any way of simply transferring all my existing filters to JP this third isp from my other two accounts? First you select the account with the most filters. ;-) Close TB Copy

Re: Multiple AB entries from filters

2003-01-19 Thread Thomas Fernandez
. ;-) The way I see it, AB and group templates don't work if the same email address is contained more than once in the AB. So, if you use different email addresses, no harm will be caused. However, new AB entries are are automatically created by filters based on the display name (according

Re: Multiple AB entries from filters

2003-01-19 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Thomas Fernandez [TF] wrote:' TF However, new AB entries are are automatically created by filters TF based on the display name (according to Daniel, I haven't tested TF it) instead of the email add

Re: Transferring filters

2003-01-19 Thread John Phillips
Hi Roelof, On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, at 15:04:55 [GMT +0100] (which was 01:04 where I live) you wrote: First you select the account with the most filters. ;-) Close TB etc. Thanks for the help! -- John Phillips, Sydney, Australia Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5.1 Build

Re: Multiple AB entries from filters

2003-01-19 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Allie, On Sun, 19 Jan 2003 11:28:20 -0500 GMT (19/01/03, 23:28 +0700 GMT), Allie Martin wrote: However, I do admit that the problems it creates may very well outweigh the advantage. I wonder if the solution is to do away with it. Perhaps something should be done about the filtering to

Multiple AB entries from filters

2003-01-18 Thread Daniel Hirning
Hello all out there in TBUDL world, Quite a few of my filters add the From address to specific groups within my Address Book. However, I am now noticing quite a lot of doubling - and indeed tripling - up of addresses. It seems that the 'Add address(es) to Address Book' action bases it's

Re: Issue with In-Box Filters

2003-01-15 Thread Richard H. Stoddard
Thanks for the info. I used the actions tab, and set both a flag and the color group. On a test message, it did set the flag properly, but not the color. Perhaps just a problem unique to me? Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 8:07:53 AM, TF wrote: TF OK, here is the confusion. Action and Advanced

Re: Issue with In-Box Filters

2003-01-15 Thread Gerard
ON Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 3:45:48 PM, you wrote: RHS Thanks for the info. I used the actions tab, and set both a flag and RHS the color group. On a test message, it did set the flag properly, but RHS not the color. Perhaps just a problem unique to me? Hi Richard, There is a know

Re: Issue with In-Box Filters

2003-01-15 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Richard, On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 09:45:48 -0500 GMT (15/01/03, 21:45 +0700 GMT), Richard H. Stoddard wrote: Thanks for the info. I used the actions tab, and set both a flag and the color group. On a test message, it did set the flag properly, but not the color. Perhaps just a problem

Issue with In-Box Filters

2003-01-14 Thread Richard H. Stoddard
I am having problems with filters for my in-boxes. I am using the inbox-known for many of my contacts, but would also like to add a filter identifying a few with a color group. The transfer to the inbox-known works fine, but the color group filters do not. On the rule tab, the source folder

Re: Issue with In-Box Filters

2003-01-14 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Richard, On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 21:43:03 -0500 GMT (15/01/03, 09:43 +0700 GMT), Richard H. Stoddard wrote: I am having problems with filters for my in-boxes. I am using the inbox-known for many of my contacts, but would also like to add a filter identifying a few with a color group

Re: Issue with In-Box Filters

2003-01-14 Thread Greg Strong
Hello Richard, On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, at 21:43:03 GMT -0500 (1/14/2003, 8:43 PM -0500 GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: I am having problems with filters for my in-boxes. I am using the inbox-known for many of my contacts, but would also like to add a

Read filters

2003-01-02 Thread Ricardo M. Reyes
I'm starting to use the read-filters and noticed that the ctrl-M shortcut doesn't trigger them (I have to open the msg in a new window to execute the filter). I think I'll add it to the bugtrack site, but before I'd like to know if I'm the only one seeing this. Maybe it's fixed the last builds

Sorting Office/Filters

2002-12-30 Thread Raf Hofmans
Hello, I've just switched to 'The Bat!', and am still exploring all the functions and features of this program. I have a simple question about the 'Sorting Office' (Account Sorting Office/Filters): Is it possible to apply a newly created 'Sorting Rule' to the messages that are *currently

Re: Sorting Office/Filters

2002-12-30 Thread marek jedlinski
. (It will run all defined filters, or classes of filters, though. I'm not sure if it's possible to run just one filter selectively.) .marek jedlinski -- No ads, no nags freeware: http://keynote.prv.pl (KeyNote, PhoneDeck, KookieJar, Oubliette) I've noticed that the press tends to be quite accurate

Re: Sorting Office/Filters

2002-12-30 Thread St - Musaic.Net
Is it possible to apply a newly created 'Sorting Rule' to the messages that are *currently* in the Inbox? This is possible in Outlook Expr, but I can't find a similar function in 'The Bat!'. Can someone help me out? Folder - Re-filter - Click for Incoming Mail. / St

Re: Sorting Office/Filters

2002-12-30 Thread Wolffe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, December 30, 2002 Raf Hofmans stated: RH Hello, RH I've just switched to 'The Bat!', and am still exploring all the RH functions and features of this program. Welcome aboard RH Is it possible to apply a newly created 'Sorting Rule' to

How to browse in 200 filters?

2002-12-25 Thread Henk van Ess
Dear all, I have over 200 filters in The Bat. I'm trying to find a quick way to navigate through all the filters. Any suggestions? -- Henkmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information

Re: How to browse in 200 filters?

2002-12-25 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Henk, On Wed, 25 Dec 2002 16:59:26 +0100GMT (25-12-02, 16:59 +0100GMT, where I live), you wrote: HvE I have over 200 filters in The Bat. I'm trying to find a quick way to HvE navigate through all the filters. Any suggestions? Best way is to give them meaningful names. Also it's best

Re[2]: Filters for both in and out boxes

2002-12-16 Thread Daniel Hirning
In reply to Thomas's message 'Filters for both in and out boxes' on Mon, 16 Dec 2002 11:53:38 +0700 from [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Thomas, TF I therefore suggested repeatedly that these filter functions TF (incoming, outgoing, read, replied) should not be seperated into TF different

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >