Hi
Since using V4 I've been allowing myself to receive some HTML mail in full
using the URL manager to allow only known senders.
However, I've noticed that retrieving the graphics quite often slows to a
crawl, the connection manager regularly reports download speeds for the URL
'links' as low
Hi Barry,
B However, I've noticed that retrieving the graphics quite often slows to a
B crawl, the connection manager regularly reports download speeds for the URL
B 'links' as low as 15-30 cps, with TB! 'not responding' until the graphics or
B whatever have been downloaded in full.
B I
Hi Barry,
B However, I've noticed that retrieving the graphics quite often slows to a
B crawl, the connection manager regularly reports download speeds for the URL
B 'links' as low as 15-30 cps, with TB! 'not responding' until the graphics or
B whatever have been downloaded in full.
B I
, except don't use AntispamSniper, which I am considering.
Hmmm I LIKE antispamsniper. I used antispam servant until it turned
into adware even when you paid for it
Well, I've disabled/removed ASS and it hasn't made any improvement at all,
downloading links in HTML mail slows to a crawl
Hello Barry,
On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 19:38:43 +0100 GMT (04/07/2008, 01:38 +0700 GMT),
Barry wrote:
B Well, I've disabled/removed ASS and it hasn't made any improvement at all,
B downloading links in HTML mail slows to a crawl, almost to the point of
B freezing TB!, clicking on any part of TB's
Hallo Lawrence,
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 22:54:21 -0500GMT (15-9-2005, 5:54 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
LJ Has anyone seen this before and is there something about the senders
LJ email that causes this?
It's a new option in TB and is caused by you replying to HTML mail.
Options - Preferences
LJ Has anyone seen this before and is there something about the senders
LJ email that causes this?
It's a new option in TB and is caused by you replying to HTML mail.
Options - Preferences - Viewer/Editor - Reply to HTML in plain text
You can check or uncheck this option and TB
Thursday, September 15, 2005, 4:16:25 AM, you wrote:
It's a new option in TB and is caused by you replying to HTML mail.
Options - Preferences - Viewer/Editor - Reply to HTML in plain text
This option does not solved the problem. I have already talk about this
problem
in the past. I have
I noticed that when I reply to some received mail, it displays in the
editor awkwardly as one huge unedittable block. I can't select the parts of
the mail I want to retain in my reply. The block is either present or
not. My signature appended to the end appears in some strange, almost
colorless
Hello Greg Strong everyone else,
on 06-Feb-2005 at 00:19 you (Greg Strong) wrote:
Giving away the IP address of the recipient when reading an HTML mail
with embedded images, providing feedback to spammers that the message
arrived.
H... I cannot see why that is a security risk.
If you
Hello Mary,
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MB And very well said. My .02 worth is to agree with all your points one
MB hundred per cent!
and I'll just add a very strong me to here but it would have to be an
option.
MB I think that the Smiley capability (also optional of
On Saturday, February 05, 2005 at 10:22:59 PM [GMT -0500], Thomas
Fernandez wrote:
GL That said, you can retrieve the entire message, external images and
GL all, even in 1.62. All you have to do is double-click the icon for the
GL HTML page to open it in your default browser. So, if you want to
On Saturday, February 05, 2005 at 10:29:57 PM [GMT -0500], Mary Bull
wrote:
I like to get my ads from Amazon. However, if they sent me an
attachment, I would become quite wary.
Me too. The spammers know about Amazon sending ads and will send
fraudulent material. I get fraudulent stuff a lot
Hello Allie,
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 06:38:24 -0500 GMT (06/02/2005, 18:38 +0700 GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
AM The interesting thing too is that if you open the message in your
AM browser, the risks are still there in terms of security and privacy.
Persactly. So I must know what I am doing, otherwise
Hello Thomas,
A reminder of what Thomas Fernandez on TBOT typed on:
Sunday, February 06, 2005 at 04:29:44 GMT +0100
TF TB's user demography will probably have a higher percentage of
TF computer savvy users than most other mailers, yet it nannies the users
TF more. Why is that?
I can't
Hello Greg,
A reminder of what Greg Strong on TBOT typed on:
Sunday, February 06, 2005 at 04:45:40 GMT +0100
GS I've seen this argument on TB lists for years. It seems to be an
GS ideological issue / opinion. Why can't you provide options and keep
GS everybody happy?
Exactly. Not having
Hello Allie!
On Sunday, February 06, 2005, 5:48 AM, you wrote:
I like to get my ads from Amazon. However, if they sent me an
attachment, I would become quite wary.
Me too. The spammers know about Amazon sending ads and will send
fraudulent material. I get fraudulent stuff a lot concerning
Hello Richard!
On Sunday, February 06, 2005, 2:34 AM, you wrote:
Off topic It's a lovely day here, a bit chilly at the momnent, but I'm
off to rake up the last two of the ten beds in the garden. I tend to
take about two hours for each one as there are a lot of stones and I
want to do it
Hello Tony,
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 12:23:02 + GMT (06/02/2005, 19:23 +0700 GMT),
Tony Boom wrote:
TB Like Thomas said, the users on this list are the elite of email users,
TB maybe a version of TB! just for us with a secret, non documented option
TB for true full blown html ability... Just
Hello Mary!
On Sunday, February 06, 2005, 6:47 AM, you wrote:
Off topic It's a lovely day here, a bit chilly at the momnent, but I'm
off to rake up the last two of the ten beds in the garden. I tend to
take about two hours for each one as there are a lot of stones and I
want to do it well.
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 at 06:38:24 -0500, Allie Martin wrote:
AM Fernandez wrote:
GL That said, you can retrieve the entire message, external images and
GL all, even in 1.62. All you have to do is double-click the icon for the
GL HTML page to open it in your default browser. So, if you want to
GL
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 at 21:29:57 -0600, Mary Bull wrote:
M How thoroughly do you filter, so that emails apparently from
M Amazon _cannot_ be spoofed?
There is that... but we have to put a level of trust in someplace...
MB I like to get my ads from Amazon. However, if they sent me an
MB
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 at 21:29:57 -0600, Mary Bull wrote:
M How thoroughly do you filter, so that emails apparently from
M Amazon _cannot_ be spoofed?
There is that... but we have to put a level of trust in someplace...
MB I like to get my ads from Amazon. However, if they sent me an
MB
Hello David!
On Sunday, February 06, 2005, 10:48 AM, you wrote:
M How thoroughly do you filter, so that emails apparently from
M Amazon _cannot_ be spoofed?
There is that... but we have to put a level of trust in someplace...
MB I like to get my ads from Amazon. However, if they sent me an
MB
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 at 11:22:51 -0600, Mary Bull wrote:
M How thoroughly do you filter, so that emails apparently from
M Amazon _cannot_ be spoofed?
There is that... but we have to put a level of trust in someplace...
MB I like to get my ads from Amazon. However, if they sent me an
MB
Thomas Fernandez @ 2005-Feb-5 10:18:57 PM
Remote Images in HTML mail? mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
And if I whitelist the LH newsletter and then someone sends me a
webbug from that address (not difficult to fake a From header), it
is *my* risk. People who don't want to take that risk will leave
Hæ!
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 08:09, Jurgen Haug wrote:
This and HTML mail as standard when you start a new mail.
No, sorry, this would let many people go away.
HTML should not be used for emails.
--
Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/
| The Bat! v3.0.2.10 Professional K9
Hello Thorvald,
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 9:16:42 AM, you wrote:
Hæ!
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 08:09, Jurgen Haug wrote:
This and HTML mail as standard when you start a new mail.
No, sorry, this would let many people go away.
HTML should not be used for emails.
HTML *is* used
At 09:16 [GMT+0100] on Saturday February 5 (actual time - 4:16pm on Saturday in
Perth, Western Australia), you wrote:
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 08:09, Jurgen Haug wrote:
This and HTML mail as standard when you start a new mail.
No, sorry, this would let many people go away.
HTML should
Hæ!
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 09:31, Jurgen Haug wrote:
HTML *is* used for eMails.
But this should not be a general habit.
--
Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/
| The Bat! v3.0.2.10 Professional K9 v1.28
| Windows 2000 SP4 (v5.0.2195)
Hæ!
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 10:25, Mic Cullen wrote:
Sometimes it's extremely useful. Rarely, but when you need it, you
really need it.
No, sorry. I do not see any sense in using HTML for emails at all.
--
Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/
| The Bat! v3.0.2.10 Professional
Hello Thorvald,
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 10:33:53 AM, you wrote:
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 10:25, Mic Cullen wrote:
Sometimes it's extremely useful. Rarely, but when you need it, you
really need it.
No, sorry. I do not see any sense in using HTML for emails at all.
we will see what
At 10:33 [GMT+0100] on Saturday February 5 (actual time - 5:33pm on Saturday in
Perth, Western Australia), you wrote:
Thorvald Saturday, February 5, 2005, 10:25, Mic Cullen wrote:
Sometimes it's extremely useful. Rarely, but when you need it, you
really need it.
Thorvald No, sorry. I do not
Hello Thorvald Neumann everyone else,
on 05-Feb-2005 at 09:16 you (Thorvald Neumann) wrote:
This and HTML mail as standard when you start a new mail.
No, sorry, this would let many people go away.
Should be made configurable. Whats the problem with a switch that defines
the default editor
Hello Jurgen,
A reminder of what Jurgen Haug on TBOT typed on:
Saturday, February 05, 2005 at 10:46:19 GMT +0100
JH we will see what Ritlabs will do in future.
Can you imagine what TBOT AKA The Cartoon Network would be like if TB!
had full blown html capability?
--
Tony.
The Bat!
Hello Thorvald Neumann everyone else,
on 05-Feb-2005 at 10:33 you (Thorvald Neumann) wrote:
Sometimes it's extremely useful. Rarely, but when you need it, you
really need it.
No, sorry. I do not see any sense in using HTML for emails at all.
Decide whats best for you, and let other people
backgrounds animated cartoons and blinking
text everywhere. But a) for me *personally* it would be so much better if I'd
have TB! with full HTML capability b) professionally, in the industry I'm
working, like it or not, HTML mail is a must. I've switching employers a lot in
the last years
Hello Jurgen Haug everyone else,
on 05-Feb-2005 at 11:19 you (Jurgen Haug) wrote:
ASCII-evangelists
LOL!!
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
The errors to avoid are those that eliminate opportunities to try
again. -- Lazar Goldberg
Hæ!
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 11:14, Jurgen Haug wrote:
exactly. but for some this is a religious matter, I guess.
No, it is not.
I am fully aware of the security risks of HTML emails. Others are not.
I am quite glad TB does not allow those features to be used.
The people who created
Hæ!
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 10:47, Mic Cullen wrote:
If I send out a weekly schedule to the people I work for/with, being able
to
colour-code the different sports/teams I'm covering that week is
incredibly
useful, so that what I'm doing and for whom and when can be very
Hæ!
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 11:13, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Decide whats best for you, and let other people decide whats best for
them...
Yes, sure.
But I hate to see TB having the HTML mode on as a default.
Because I am educating my clients to use plain text emails,
preferably with TB
Hæ!
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 11:19, Jurgen Haug wrote:
b) professionally, in the industry I'm working, like it or not, HTML
mail is a must.
Sorry, I disagree.
I am using emails professionally since 1994.
And I have never seen an industry/company where HTML is a *must*.
--
Kveðja
Hello Jurgen,
A reminder of what Jurgen Haug on TBOT typed on:
Saturday, February 05, 2005 at 11:20:36 GMT +0100
JH And if even so, so what?
To be honest, I'm easy either way. I have no problem with displaying html
images direct from the web in email, it can't hurt can it?
It's just so
Hello Thorvald,
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 11:37:16 AM, you wrote:
Hæ!
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 11:19, Jurgen Haug wrote:
b) professionally, in the industry I'm working, like it or not, HTML
mail is a must.
Sorry, I disagree.
I am using emails professionally since 1994.
And I
Hæ!
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 11:45, Jurgen Haug wrote:
so you tell me you know better than me what is going on in the kind
of industry *I* am working?
Read my sentence again. I did not say that. It's your interpretation.
--
Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/
| The Bat!
some people
JH to TB! This and HTML mail as standard when you start a new mail.
Preferences..Viewer/Editor..Default message/text editor.
Enjoy. (Or shudder, as I do).
--
Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator and fellow end user
TB! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2
Hello Tony,
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 11:46:23 AM, you wrote:
To be honest, I'm easy either way. I have no problem with displaying html
images direct from the web in email, it can't hurt can it?
It's just so many people are against it.
so many people *on here* are against it. But I
At 11:33 [GMT+0100] on Saturday February 5 (actual time - 6:33pm on Saturday in
Perth, Western Australia), you wrote:
If I send out a weekly schedule to the people I work for/with, being
able to
colour-code the different sports/teams I'm covering that week is
incredibly
useful, so
At 12:52 [GMT+0100] on Saturday February 5 (actual time - 7:52pm on Saturday in
Perth, Western Australia), you wrote:
Jurgen And better support for HTML mail. But I think they're working on that.
Indeed - being able to save a template as HTML would be a real time-saver for
me. (Even
Hæ!
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 12:50, Mic Cullen wrote:
No, I don't want the world to see it.
A website does not imply it's accessible to the whole world.
--
Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/
| The Bat! v3.0.2.10 Professional K9 v1.28
| Windows 2000 SP4 (v5.0.2195)
Hello Marck,
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 12:24:38 PM, you wrote:
JH yeah that would be nice, it would have made me convert some people
JH to TB! This and HTML mail as standard when you start a new mail.
Preferences..Viewer/Editor..Default message/text editor.
Enjoy. (Or shudder, as I do
At 13:05 [GMT+0100] on Saturday February 5 (actual time - 8:05pm on Saturday in
Perth, Western Australia), you wrote:
No, I don't want the world to see it.
Thorvald A website does not imply it's accessible to the whole world.
This is getting ridiculous, but if I want people (of
Hello Thorvald,
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 10:33:53 +0100 GMT (05/02/2005, 16:33 +0700 GMT),
Thorvald Neumann wrote:
Sometimes it's extremely useful. Rarely, but when you need it, you
really need it.
TN No, sorry. I do not see any sense in using HTML for emails at all.
Thanks for your opinion. I
Hallo Jurgen,
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 12:46:44 +0100GMT (5-2-2005, 12:46 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
JH But I didn't buy TB! to communicate with TB!-users.
Neither did I and I still haven't decided whether it's an advantage or
a disadvantage that it enables me to do so. ;-)
--
Groetjes,
Hello Thorvald Neumann everyone else,
on 05-Feb-2005 at 11:32 you (Thorvald Neumann) wrote:
I am fully aware of the security risks of HTML emails.
Could you name one, please. Talking about security, not privacy. Talking
about pure HTML (not javascript, and not ActiveX, either).
--
Best
On 05 February 2005, 10:46, Tony Boom wrote:
To be honest, I'm easy either way. I have no problem with displaying html
images direct from the web in email, it can't hurt can it?
~~~
I, for one, am very glad that TB won't display external images, and
it's the main reason why I was prepared to
Hello Geoff Lane everyone else,
on 05-Feb-2005 at 13:48 you (Geoff Lane) wrote:
External images can be used for malevolent purposes. For example, as
web beacons to track your usage, or for spammers to verify your e-mail
address. So, yes, displaying html images direct from the web in e-mail
Hello Alexander,
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 1:52:05 PM, you wrote:
This is a privacy, not a security issue. For that very reason the wish to
add a sender to a list of trusted senders from whom remote images are
allowed exists. Or a simple menu entry download images now.
:good: that's one
Hello Jurgen,
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005, at 08:09:50 [GMT +0100] (which was 7:09 where I
live) you wrote:
yeah that would be nice, it would have made me convert some
people to TB! This and HTML mail as standard when you start a new
mail. Each time I show collegues TB! (am the only one using
Hello Alexander,
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 13:52:05 +0100 GMT (05/02/2005, 19:52 +0700 GMT),
Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
External images can be used for malevolent purposes. For example, as
web beacons to track your usage, or for spammers to verify your e-mail
address. So, yes, displaying html images
Hello Marck D Pearlstone everyone else,
on 05-Feb-2005 at 12:24 you (Marck D Pearlstone) wrote:
Preferences..Viewer/Editor..Default message/text editor.
D'oh - its already there... :-)
What we need now is some solution for the remote images, as described in
Tony Boom @ 2005-Feb-5 5:46:23 AM
Remote Images in HTML mail? mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To be honest, I'm easy either way. I have no problem with displaying html
images direct from the web in email, it can't hurt can it?
It can though.
1) Your kid gets porn spam. Would you rather have
to open the images right in
the menu pane like Thunderbird or Pocomail does.
JH yeah that would be nice, it would have made me convert some
JH people to TB! This and HTML mail as standard when you start a new
JH mail. Each time I show collegues TB! (am the only one using that
JH at work) that's one
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 at 10:33:53 +0100, Thorvald Neumann wrote:
TN Hæ!
TN Saturday, February 5, 2005, 10:25, Mic Cullen wrote:
Sometimes it's extremely useful. Rarely, but when you need it, you
really need it.
TN No, sorry. I do not see any sense in using HTML for emails at all.
I see more use
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 at 10:33:53 +0100, Thorvald Neumann wrote:
TN Hæ!
TN Saturday, February 5, 2005, 10:25, Mic Cullen wrote:
Sometimes it's extremely useful. Rarely, but when you need it, you
really need it.
TN No, sorry. I do not see any sense in using HTML for emails at all.
I see more use
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 at 09:16:42 +0100, Thorvald Neumann wrote:
TN Hæ!
TN Saturday, February 5, 2005, 08:09, Jurgen Haug wrote:
This and HTML mail as standard when you start a new mail.
TN No, sorry, this would let many people go away.
TN HTML should not be used for emails.
I think he means
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 at 11:08:06 +0100, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
ASK on 05-Feb-2005 at 09:16 you (Thorvald Neumann) wrote:
This and HTML mail as standard when you start a new mail.
No, sorry, this would let many people go away.
ASK Should be made configurable. Whats the problem with a switch
Hello Chris,
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 08:48:19 -0500 GMT (05/02/2005, 20:48 +0700 GMT),
Chris wrote:
C 1) Your kid gets porn spam. Would you rather have the images show up
C right away or only after asked so he or she can delete it without
C seeing the images.
I'm impressed about your kids. Depending
Hello Geoff,
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 13:15:35 + GMT (05/02/2005, 20:15 +0700 GMT),
Geoff Lane wrote:
GL FWIW, I didn't claim it to be either a security or a privacy issue -
GL just something that I don't want.
Others may want it. It is requested as an option only.
GL However, there are known
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 at 22:02:41 +1100, Ian A. White wrote:
IAW Thorvald,
IAW On Saturday, February 5, 2005, 9:34:50 PM, you (Thorvald Neumann) wrote:
TN Hæ!
TN Saturday, February 5, 2005, 11:13, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Decide whats best for you, and let other people decide whats best for
.
This is one feature in ThunderBird that makes it more pleasant to read
mail with. By default, it doesn't retrieve graphics or other data in
HTML mail. However, at the click of a button, you can do this right
there in the viewer.
--
Cheers,
-= Allie =-
. As I said before, I never repeat myself
Hello David,
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 3:20:50 PM, you wrote:
If I recall Netscape/Mozilla mail used to have the option in the
address book for tagging contacts as 'This person prefers plain text
email' or 'this person prefers HTML email' or 'Send Both'. Something
along those lines would
Hi Alexander,
On Saturday, February 05, 2005, at 2:08:06 AM PST, you wrote:
This and HTML mail as standard when you start a new mail.
No, sorry, this would let many people go away.
Should be made configurable. Whats the problem with a switch that
defines the default editor?
There already
Hello Chris everyone else,
on 05-Feb-2005 at 14:48 you (Chris) wrote:
2) Web bugs allow e-mailers to track who read what message when. This
is normally done be embedding an image with a source like this:
http://www.flybynight.com/scripts/[EMAIL PROTECTED]msgid=AD57
Thats the stuff I don't
Hello Geoff Lane everyone else,
on 05-Feb-2005 at 14:15 you (Geoff Lane) wrote:
FWIW, I didn't claim it to be either a security or a privacy issue -
just something that I don't want.
Neither do I, but it doesn't disqualify HTML email as a whole.
However, there are known security issues
On Saturday, February 5, 2005, 19:01:54, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Thats the stuff I don't like either. Maybe a future TB function to download
remote images should include a check that the URL does not contain an email
address, or some other measure to prevent web bugs.
It doesn't have to be
On 05 February 2005, 14:07, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
GL FWIW, I didn't claim it to be either a security or a privacy issue -
GL just something that I don't want.
Others may want it. It is requested as an option only.
GL However, there are known security issues with html images that can
GL cause
Hello Geoff,
A reminder of what Geoff Lane on TBOT typed on:
Saturday, February 05, 2005 at 13:46:24 GMT +0100
GL So, yes, displaying html images direct from the web in e-mail can hurt.
You maybe, not me though.
--
Tony.
The Bat! 3.0.2.10
Registered Linux user #316959
On 05 February 2005, 18:08, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
But it doesn't disqualify HTML email either just because one or the other
programmer screwed up and built code vulnerable to attacks. I have trust in
RITlabs to make their code as best as possible.
~~~
FWIW, I strongly suspect that
Hello Chris,
A reminder of what Chris on TBOT typed on:
Saturday, February 05, 2005 at 14:53:36 GMT +0100
C It can though.
OK, I'll play along.
C 1) Your kid gets porn spam. Would you rather have the images show up
C right away or only after asked so he or she can delete it without
C
Hello Thomas,
A reminder of what Thomas Fernandez on TBOT typed on:
Saturday, February 05, 2005 at 15:17:35 GMT +0100
TF But then, I still fail to see why sexually implicit movies are so
TF heavily regulated (how can they hurt anyone?), like PG18, while
TF violent movies are often rated only
(not javascript, and not ActiveX, either).
Giving away the IP address of the recipient when reading an HTML mail
with embedded images, providing feedback to spammers that the message
arrived.
That's one. There are others. Downloading *anything* at the behest of
an *email* is fundamentally a security breach
an HTML mail
with embedded images, providing feedback to spammers that the message
arrived.
H... I cannot see why that is a security risk.
That's one. There are others. Downloading *anything* at the behest of
an *email* is fundamentally a security breach - it's not the way email
Hello Greg!
On Saturday, February 05, 2005, 5:19 PM, you wrote, in part:
Now having said that I will also state I'm a text based email advocate
because I do understand that HTML email increases risk. I read all email
in plain text. I don't know of any statistics on TB users, but would
tend
Hi
On Saturday 5 February 2005 at 2:29:09 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], David Calvarese wrote:
Even being able to take certain addresses as 'safe' to
automaticly display the images for them. Like Amazon, I'm pretty
sure their emails are safe.
How thoroughly do you filter, so that emails
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 at 02:22:58 +, MFPA wrote:
M Hi
M On Saturday 5 February 2005 at 2:29:09 PM, in
M mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], David Calvarese wrote:
Even being able to take certain addresses as 'safe' to
automaticly display the images for them. Like Amazon, I'm pretty
sure their emails are
Hello Jernej,
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 19:40:35 +0100 GMT (06/02/2005, 01:40 +0700 GMT),
Jernej Simoncic wrote:
Thats the stuff I don't like either. Maybe a future TB function to download
remote images should include a check that the URL does not contain an email
address, or some other measure to
Hello Geoff,
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 18:46:28 + GMT (06/02/2005, 01:46 +0700 GMT),
Geoff Lane wrote:
GL I'm not saying for one moment that these things should not be
GL available for those who want it - just that you should have the option
GL to turn them off if you don't.
Thanks, and I think
Hello Thomas,
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 10:18:57 +0700 GMT(2/5/2005, 9:18 PM -0600 GMT),
per mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TB's user demography will probably have a higher percentage of
computer savvy users than most other mailers, yet it nannies the users
more. Why is that?
This
Hello Thomas,
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 10:37:57 +0700 GMT(2/5/2005, 9:37 PM -0600 GMT),
per mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thomas Fernandez wrote:
MDP That's one. There are others. Downloading *anything* at the behest of
MDP an *email* is fundamentally a security breach - it's not the way email
MDP is
Hello Greg!
On Saturday, February 05, 2005, 9:45 PM, you wrote:
MDP That's one. There are others. Downloading *anything* at the behest of
MDP an *email* is fundamentally a security breach - it's not the way email
MDP is supposed to work.
...was supposed to work, I'd say. Welcome to the 21st
Hey All,
Is there a way to make TB! display remote images in an HTML mail for
email that we know is safe? Say from like Amazon.com or Newegg.com?
I'm trying to convince a friend of mine to switch over to TB!
--
Best regards,
David
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Hi David,
On Friday, February 04, 2005, at 8:20:02 PM PST, you wrote:
Is there a way to make TB! display remote images in an HTML mail for
email that we know is safe? Say from like Amazon.com or Newegg.com?
I'm trying to convince a friend of mine to switch over to TB!
I don't think you can
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 at 20:27:26 -0800, Melissa Reese wrote:
Is there a way to make TB! display remote images in an HTML mail for
email that we know is safe? Say from like Amazon.com or Newegg.com?
I'm trying to convince a friend of mine to switch over to TB!
MR I don't think you can download
to be able to open the images right in
the menu pane like Thunderbird or Pocomail does.
yeah that would be nice, it would have made me convert some people to TB! This
and HTML mail as standard when you start a new mail. Each time I show collegues
TB! (am the only one using that at work) that's one
Hi
On Thursday, 28 October, 2004, at 12:42:22 PM, Roelof Otten wrote:
JS Proper extension for e-mail messages is actually .MSG - .EML is Microsoft's
JS invention.
Z So why is TB! using it?
Dunno.
Z TB! is not know for its adherence to MS standards and were can I change this
Z in TB! from
ON Wednesday, October 27, 2004, 1:17:33 PM, you wrote:
RO Specials - Alternative forward
RO or ShiftAltF5
Hi Roelof,
Look what a customer of mine received in their mail when I attached the EML
extension:
This text was added by an EDS mail relay -
On Thursday, October 28, 2004, 8:57:24, Gerard wrote:
So is there an EML equivalent extension not on the ban list that you know of?
Proper extension for e-mail messages is actually .MSG - .EML is Microsoft's
invention.
--
Jernej Simoncic http://deepthought.ena.si/
Anticipated events never
ON Thursday, October 28, 2004, 9:15:36 AM, you wrote:
JS Proper extension for e-mail messages is actually .MSG - .EML is Microsoft's
JS invention.
Hi Jernej,
So why is TB! using it?
TB! is not know for its adherence to MS standards and were can I change this
in TB! from EML to MSG?
--
Best
Hello Gerard!
On Thursday, October 28, 2004, 6:36 AM, you wrote, in part:
G were can I change this in TB! from EML to MSG?
Main Window of TB!, Options/Preferences/Protection.
I am so skittish of messing with TB!'s default here, however, that
before I made a change I did a CP to SmartBat, so
1 - 100 of 323 matches
Mail list logo
