Re[2]: IMAP and GMX and the Bat

2003-01-24 Thread Laura
geez, it's really cheap to get a fastmail.fm account.. i can't believe that access to an account would be a holdup. Not to mention, the free account has imap access according to their frontpage. I love using fastmail.fm for all kinds of things. Laura --

Re: IMAP and GMX and the Bat

2003-01-24 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Markus MG Anybody willing to chip in to get for the RIT Labs people a MG fastmail.fm account so that they see how good and useful IMAP MG could be? Let them get a free account from fastmail otherwise the upgrade price will go up! I'm mighty impressed with my full fastmail account-- it's

Re: IMAP and GMX and the Bat

2002-12-12 Thread Markus Gloede
Hi, I wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : GMX has proudly announced that subscribers with professional accounts may now also access their email via IMAP. Yet, they currently have it only optimized for Outlook and Outlook Express (newer Netscape versions may also work but they are not

Re: IMAP and GMX and the Bat

2002-12-12 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, December 12, 2002, Markus Gloede wrote... GMX has proudly announced that subscribers with professional accounts may now also access their email via IMAP. Well, for the people following this thread, I have new information. Upon my

Re: IMAP and GMX and the Bat

2002-12-12 Thread Markus Gloede
Hi, Jonathan Angliss wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Although I couldn't work out why they were writing their own system as their are plenty of IMAP servers about, unless they're using complete custom software for all parts of their systems including the dial-up db, account information,

Re: IMAP and GMX and the Bat

2002-12-10 Thread Markus Gloede
Hi, Jonathan Angliss wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : As has been said before, TB!s IMAP support is very... restricted in the fact that it treats IMAP as a multi-folder POP3 server, instead of true IMAP. I accept that and are willing to work with it until the world is saved and TB!2 comes

Re: IMAP and GMX and the Bat

2002-12-10 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, Markus Gloede wrote... There is a possibility that if GMX sorts the servers out, you could read the mail. GMX is not very talkative. This is their banner greeting: OK GMX IMAP4 StreamProxy ready. I did a google

Re: IMAP and GMX and the Bat

2002-12-10 Thread Markus Gloede
Hi, thank you Jonathan for sticking with this thread. Jonathan Angliss wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : I did a google search for just imap streamproxy and all the references I found were pointing to GMX's POP3 and IMAP servers miss-behaving in some awful way, like breaking RFCs in ways

Re: IMAP and GMX and the Bat

2002-12-10 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, Markus Gloede wrote... I did a google search for just imap streamproxy and all the references I found were pointing to GMX's POP3 and IMAP servers miss-behaving in some awful way, like breaking RFCs in ways you'd

Re[2]: IMAP and GMX and the Bat

2002-12-10 Thread Mark Wieder
Jonathan- If I remember correctly (and I'm not entirely sure I do, not being able to find the proper RFC at the moment) the authentication mechanism will fall back from MD5-CRAM to plaintext if both sides don't explicitly say they support it and try to enforce its use. -Mark Wieder Using The

IMAP and GMX and the Bat

2002-12-09 Thread Markus Gloede
not get it to work with the latest Bat. I can see all folders in my accounts (with broken umlauts) but they all appear empty in the Bat's IMAP 'Dispatcher'. Now I'm waiting for either of the following to happen: - better IMAP support in the Bat - GMX supporting the Bat's way of IMAP - somebody else

Re: IMAP and GMX and the Bat

2002-12-09 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Markus, On Mon, 9 Dec 2002 10:15:22 +0100 GMT (09/12/02, 16:15 +0700 GMT), Markus Gloede wrote: P.S.: This messages has been posted before on the the Bat off-topic list but apparently there aren't any GMX pro account users there. I posting to this list to find out if anyone here is

Re: IMAP and GMX and the Bat

2002-12-09 Thread Markus Gloede
Hi, Thomas Fernandez wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : They also say that support for other mail clients will follow shortly. I also read their announcement with interest. Yet, I'm not inclined to sit back and wait. I don't know why IMAP support depends so much on the client used, but

Re: IMAP and GMX and the Bat

2002-12-09 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, December 09, 2002, Markus Gloede wrote... I don't know why IMAP support depends so much on the client used, but according to their mailing, there is no reason to assume that this first version should work with TB at all. I recall

Re: IMAP and GMX and the Bat

2002-12-09 Thread Markus Gloede
Hi, Jonathan Angliss wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Wait until TB!2 comes out first... The 1.6 series of TB has bad IMAP support ;) Very funny. This could become a running joke. Wait for TB!2 Q: When will we have world peace? A: Wait for TB!2. Q: Why did the dinosaurs become extinct? A:

Re: IMAP and GMX and the Bat

2002-12-09 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, December 09, 2002, Markus Gloede wrote... Wait until TB!2 comes out first... The 1.6 series of TB has bad IMAP support ;) Very funny. This could become a running joke. Wait for TB!2 [snip] lol... very good ;) Anybody here that

Re: IMAP and GMX and the Bat

2002-12-09 Thread Markus Gloede
Hi, Jonathan Angliss wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : As has been said before, TB!s IMAP support is very... restricted in the fact that it treats IMAP as a multi-folder POP3 server, instead of true IMAP. There is a possibility that if GMX sorts the servers out, you could read the mail.

Re[2]: IMAP and GMX and the Bat

2002-12-09 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Markus! On Monday, December 9, 2002 at 11:07:22 AM you wrote: MG Jonathan Angliss wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Wait until TB!2 comes out first... The 1.6 series of TB has bad IMAP support ;) MG Very funny. This could become a running joke. Wait for TB!2 lol, Markus. Have no need